Literature DB >> 21739104

Combination of texture analysis and bone mineral density improves the prediction of fracture load in human femurs.

T Le Corroller1, J Halgrin, M Pithioux, D Guenoun, P Chabrand, P Champsaur.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Twenty-one excised femurs were studied using (1) a high-resolution digital X-ray device to estimate three textural parameters, (2) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure bone mineral density (BMD), and (3) mechanical tests to failure. Textural parameters significantly correlated with BMD (p < 0.05) and bone strength (p < 0.05). Combining texture parameters and BMD significantly improved the fracture load prediction from adjusted r(2) = 0.74 to adjusted r(2) =0.82 (p < 0.05).
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination of bone texture parameters using a new high-resolution X-ray device and BMD measurement by DXA provided a better prediction of femoral failure load than BMD evaluation alone.
METHODS: The proximal ends of 21 excised femurs were studied using (1) a high-resolution digital X-ray device (BMA, D3A Medical Systems) to estimate three textural parameters: fractal parameter Hmean, co-occurrence, and run-length matrices, (2) DXA to measure BMD, and (3) mechanical tests to failure in a side-impact configuration. Regions of interest in the femoral neck, intertrochanteric region, and greater trochanter were selected for DXA and bone texture analysis. Every specimen was scanned twice with repositioning before mechanical testing to assess reproducibility using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval. The prediction of femoral failure load was evaluated using multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: Thirteen femoral neck and 8 intertrochanteric fractures were observed with a mean failure load of 2,612 N (SD, 1,382 N). Fractal parameter Hmean, co-occurrence, and run-length matrices each significantly correlated with site-matched BMD (p < 0.05) and bone strength (p < 0.05). The ICC of the textural parameters varied between 0.65 and 0.90. Combining bone texture parameters and BMD significantly improved the fracture load prediction from adjusted r(2) =0.74 to adjusted r(2) = 0.82 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In these excised femurs, the combination of bone texture parameters with BMD demonstrated a better performance in the failure load prediction than that of BMD alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21739104     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1703-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs of iliac bone is correlated with bone micro-CT.

Authors:  P Guggenbuhl; F Bodic; L Hamel; M F Baslé; D Chappard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Imaging techniques for evaluating bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Eric Lespessailles; Christine Chappard; Nicolas Bonnet; Claude Laurent Benhamou
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; D M L Cooper; S Kontulainen; P Guy; B B Forster; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Hip fracture.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.

Authors:  Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva M Lochmüller; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Clinical interest of bone texture analysis in osteoporosis: a case control multicenter study.

Authors:  E Lespessailles; C Gadois; I Kousignian; J P Neveu; P Fardellone; S Kolta; C Roux; J P Do-Huu; C L Benhamou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images: relationship to clinical characteristics and to bone fragility.

Authors:  Tamara Vokes; Diane Lauderdale; Siu-Ling Ma; Mike Chinander; Keona Childs; Maryellen Giger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  12 in total

1.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  The predictive value of trabecular bone score (TBS) on whole lumbar vertebrae mechanics: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  J P Roux; J Wegrzyn; S Boutroy; M L Bouxsein; D Hans; R Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Yinxiao Liu; Cheng Chen; Kevin K Chu; Chamith S Rajapakse; Kenneth Egol; Ding Xia; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  External bone size identifies different strength-decline trajectories for the male human femora.

Authors:  Morgan W Bolger; Genevieve E Romanowicz; Erin M R Bigelow; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Karl J Jepsen; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.867

6.  Random field assessment of inhomogeneous bone mineral density from DXA scans can enhance the differentiation between postmenopausal women with and without hip fractures.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Rajeshwar Pinninti; Timothy Lowe; Patricia Cussen; Joyce E Ballard; David Di Paolo; Mukul Shirvaikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Segmentation and texture analysis of structural biomarkers using neighborhood-clustering-based level set in MRI of the schizophrenic brain.

Authors:  Manohar Latha; Ganesan Kavitha
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Assessment of bone fragility with clinical imaging modalities.

Authors:  Xn Dong; X Wang
Journal:  Hard Tissue       Date:  2013-02-15

9.  Bone texture analysis is correlated with three-dimensional microarchitecture and mechanical properties of trabecular bone in osteoporotic femurs.

Authors:  Thomas Le Corroller; Martine Pithioux; Fahmi Chaari; Benoît Rosa; Sébastien Parratte; Boris Maurel; Jean-Noël Argenson; Pierre Champsaur; Patrick Chabrand
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Biomechanical properties and microarchitecture parameters of trabecular bone are correlated with stochastic measures of 2D projection images.

Authors:  Xuanliang N Dong; Mukul Shirvaikar; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.