Literature DB >> 21125361

Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Karl J Jepsen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in diagnostic and treatment regimens that aim to reduce fracture incidence will benefit from a better understanding of how bone morphology and tissue quality define whole-bone mechanical properties. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The goal of this article was to review what is known about the interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits and how these interactions contribute to bone quality (ie, whole-bone mechanical function). Several questions were addressed. First, how do interactions among morphology and tissue quality traits relate to functional adaptation? Second, what are the emergent patterns of functionally adapted trait sets in long bones? Third, how effective is phenotypic integration at establishing function across a population? Fourth, what are the emergent patterns of functionally adapted trait sets in corticocancellous structures? Fifth, how do functional interactions change with aging?
METHODS: A literature review was conducted with papers identified primarily through citations listed in reference sections as well as general searches using Google Scholar and PubMed.
RESULTS: The interactions among adult traits or phenotypic integration are an emergent property of the compensatory mechanisms complex systems used to establish function or homeostasis. Traits are not regulated independently but vary simultaneously (ie, covary) in specific ways to establish function. This covariation results in individuals acquiring unique sets of traits to establish bone quality. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Biologic constraints imposed on the skeletal system result in a population showing a pattern of trait sets that is predictable based on external bone size and that can be used to identify individuals with reduced bone quality relative to their bone size and body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21125361      PMCID: PMC3126971          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1706-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  73 in total

Review 1.  The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  From genotype to phenotype: buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information.

Authors:  S L Rutherford
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything.

Authors:  M C van der Meulen; K J Jepsen; B Mikić
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Increase in bone volume fraction precedes architectural adaptation in growing bone.

Authors:  E Tanck; J Homminga; G H van Lenthe; R Huiskes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Genome screen for quantitative trait loci underlying normal variation in femoral structure.

Authors:  D L Koller; G Liu; M J Econs; S L Hui; P A Morin; G Joslyn; L A Rodriguez; P M Conneally; J C Christian; C C Johnston; T Foroud; M Peacock
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans.

Authors:  C B Ruff
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures.

Authors:  Y Duan; A m Parfitt; E Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Ground reaction forces, bone characteristics, and tibial stress fracture in male runners.

Authors:  K Crossley; K L Bennell; T Wrigley; B W Oakes
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  The contribution of reduced peak accrual of bone and age-related bone loss to osteoporosis at the spine and hip: insights from the daughters of women with vertebral or hip fractures.

Authors:  A Tabensky; Y Duan; J Edmonds; E Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; R A Shaffer; K Betsinger; D W Trone; S K Brodine
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  13 in total

1.  Do regional modifications in tissue mineral content and microscopic mineralization heterogeneity adapt trabecular bone tracts for habitual bending? Analysis in the context of trabecular architecture of deer calcanei.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Alex N Knight; Ryan W Farnsworth; Roy D Bloebaum
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Bone composition: relationship to bone fragility and antiosteoporotic drug effects.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-12-04

3.  Osteocalcin and osteopontin influence bone morphology and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; Gerard Karsenty; Caren Gundberg; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Using GWAS to identify novel therapeutic targets for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Olivia L Sabik; Charles R Farber
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 7.012

5.  Genetic perturbations that impair functional trait interactions lead to reduced bone strength and increased fragility in mice.

Authors:  Lauren M Smith; Erin M R Bigelow; Bonnie T Nolan; Meghan E Faillace; Joseph H Nadeau; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Research perspectives: The 2013 AAOS/ORS research symposium on Bone Quality and Fracture Prevention.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly; Joseph M Lane; Adele L Boskey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Parathyroid Hormone (1-34) Transiently Protects Against Radiation-Induced Bone Fragility.

Authors:  Megan E Oest; Kenneth A Mann; Nicholas D Zimmerman; Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Links Between the Microbiome and Bone.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Jason D Guss; Marysol Luna; Steven R Goldring
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Characterization of complex, co-adapted skeletal biomechanics phenotypes: a needed paradigm shift in the genetics of bone structure and function.

Authors:  L M Havill; H B Coan; M C Mahaney; D P Nicolella
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Congenic Strains Confirm the Pleiotropic Effect of Chromosome 4 QTL on Mouse Femoral Geometry and Biomechanical Performance.

Authors:  Jasmin Kristianto; Suzanne J Litscher; Michael G Johnson; Forum Patel; Mital Patel; Jacqueline Fisher; Ryley K Zastrow; Abigail B Radcliff; Robert D Blank
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.