Literature DB >> 18649096

Does experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery influence intraoperative outcomes?

Alexandre Bouchard1, Guillaume Martel, Elham Sabri, Christopher M Schlachta, Eric C Poulin, Joseph Mamazza, Robin P Boushey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to define the management and risk factors for intraoperative complications (IOC) and conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and to assess whether surgeon experience influences intraoperative outcomes.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal procedures from 1991 to 2005 were analyzed from a longitudinal prospectively collected database. All patients referred to the four surgeons involved in this study were offered a minimally invasive approach. Patient characteristics, perioperative variables, and surgeon experience data were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: A total of 991 consecutive laparoscopic colorectal procedures were studied. The majority of operations were performed for malignant disease (n=526, 53%), and most frequently consisted of segmental colonic resections (n=718, 72%). A total of 85 patients (8.6%) had an IOC. Patients experiencing an IOC had a significantly higher median body weight (75 versus 68 kg, p=0.0047) and had a higher proportion of previous abdominal surgery (31% versus 20%, p=0.029). Only 39% of patients suffering an IOC required conversion to open surgery. A total of 126 (13%) cases were converted to open surgery. On multivariable analysis, previous abdominal surgery [odds ratio (OR) 3.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-8.35, p=0.0076] was independently associated with having an IOC and a conversion to open within the same procedure. With increasing experience, individual surgeons were found to operate on heavier patients (p=0.025), and on patients who had a higher rate of previous intra-abdominal surgery (p<0.0001). Despite these risk factors, the early and late experience demonstrated no significant difference in terms of IOCs (p=0.54) and conversion to open surgery (p=0.40).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of IOCs can be managed laparoscopically. With increasing experience surgeons can perform laparoscopic colorectal surgery on a patient population with a greater proportion of previous abdominal surgery and a higher mean body weight without adversely affecting their rates of intraoperative complications or conversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18649096     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

Review 1.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

3.  Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  A J Pikarsky; Y Saida; T Yamaguchi; S Martinez; W Chen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe in the high-risk patient: a NSQIP risk-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Carol A McCloskey; Mark A Wilson; Steven J Hughes; George M Eid
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Khaled Madboulay; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio; C Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Complications and conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicenter Brazilian trial.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.719

10.  The influence of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Jan Franko; Brendan G O'Connell; John R Mehall; Steven G Harper; Joseph H Nejman; D Mark Zebley; Steven A Fassler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  9 in total

1.  A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain.

Authors:  John T Jenkins; Andrew Currie; Stefano Sala; Robin H Kennedy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a national survey of general surgeons.

Authors:  Husein Moloo; Fatima Haggar; Guillaume Martel; Jeremy Grimshaw; Doug Coyle; Ian D Graham; Elham Sabri; Eric C Poulin; Joseph Mamazza; Fady K Balaa; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic colon resection for cancer after implementation of a full-time preceptorship.

Authors:  Yasir Akmal; Carissa Bailey; Jeong-Heum Baek; Michelle Metchikian; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic colectomy for complex diverticular disease: a justifiable choice?

Authors:  Guillaume Martel; Alexandre Bouchard; Claudia M Soto; Eric C Poulin; Joseph Mamazza; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  [Intraoperative complications of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Prevention, recognition and therapy].

Authors:  J-P Ritz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy.

Authors:  Shaun C Daly; Matthew M Klairmont; Amanda B Francescatti; Jonathan A Myers; Daniel J Deziel; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection--better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients.

Authors:  P Kambakamba; D Dindo; A Nocito; P A Clavien; B Seifert; M Schäfer; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.

Authors:  A K Warps; D Saraste; M Westerterp; R Detering; A Sjövall; A Martling; J W T Dekker; R A E M Tollenaar; P Matthiessen; P J Tanis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.453

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.