Literature DB >> 24442677

Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy.

Shaun C Daly1, Matthew M Klairmont, Amanda B Francescatti, Jonathan A Myers, Daniel J Deziel, Minh B Luu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgeon case volume has been utilized in the credentialing process as a surrogate for surgeon skill. The purpose of this study was to compare objective outcome measures of laparoscopic partial colectomies performed by laparoscopically skilled surgeons with varying annual case census.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort review of all patients (n = 255) undergoing elective laparoscopic partial colectomy. Patients were grouped according to surgeon's annual case volume as low annual case volume (LV; n = 48) and high annual case volume (HV; n = 207). HV is defined as performing >20 total cases and >25 cases per year. All demographic and clinical variables were evaluated with univariate logistic regression followed by a multivariate logistic regression model for variables approaching significance.
RESULTS: Demographic variables were found to be similar between groups. Only median estimated blood loss (100 vs. 150 mL for HV; p = 0.040) was found to be significantly different between groups. However, this was clinically insignificant, as it did not lead to an increased rate of blood transfusions (0.0 vs. 3.9 % for HV surgeons; p = 0.184). All other variables were similar in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
CONCLUSIONS: Among surgeons with advanced laparoscopic training, the data suggest that LV surgeons are able to achieve similar outcomes as those who perform the operation routinely. Annual case volume should not be given undue emphasis when deciding whether to award privileges for laparoscopic partial colectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442677     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3365-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

Review 1.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Selwyn O Rogers; Robert E Wolf; Alan M Zaslavsky; William E Wright; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Credentialing for laparoscopic bowel operation: there is no substitute for knowing the outcomes.

Authors:  Neil Hyman; Edward Borrazzo; Gino Trevisani; Turner Osler; Steven Shackford
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Choi; Woon Kyung Jeong; Sang-Woo Lim; Tae Sung Chung; Jung-In Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Byung-Ho Nam; Hee Jin Chang; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

6.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic colon resection early in the learning curve: what is the appropriate setting?

Authors:  Daniel J Reichenbach; A Darrel Tackett; James Harris; Diego Camacho; Edward A Graviss; Brendan Dewan; Ashley Vavra; Anquonette Stiles; William E Fisher; F Charles Brunicardi; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer.

Authors:  David W Larson; Peter W Marcello; Sergio W Larach; Steven D Wexner; Adrian Park; John Marks; Anthony J Senagore; Alan G Thorson; Tonia M Young-Fadok; Erin Green; Daniel J Sargent; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  José H M Keurentjes; Justine M Briët; Geertruida H de Bock; Marian J E Mourits
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.