Literature DB >> 24477638

Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection--better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients.

P Kambakamba1, D Dindo, A Nocito, P A Clavien, B Seifert, M Schäfer, D Hahnloser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intraoperative adverse events significantly influence morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Over an 11-year period, the changes of occurrence of such intraoperative adverse events were assessed in this study.
METHODS: Analysis of 3,928 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection based on the prospective database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery was performed.
RESULTS: Overall, 377 intraoperative adverse events occurred in 329 patients (overall incidence of 8.4 %). Of 377 events, 163 (43 %) were surgical complications and 214 (57 %) were nonsurgical adverse events. Surgical complications were iatrogenic injury to solid organs (n = 63; incidence of 1.6 %), bleeding (n = 62; 1.6 %), lesion by puncture (n = 25; 0.6 %), and intraoperative anastomotic leakage (n = 13; 0.3 %). Of note, 11 % of intraoperative organ/puncture lesions requiring re-intervention were missed intraoperatively. Nonsurgical adverse events were problems with equipment (n = 127; 3.2 %), anesthetic problems (n = 30; 0.8 %), and various (n = 57; 1.5 %). Over time, the rate of intraoperative adverse events decreased, but not significantly. Bleeding complications significantly decreased (p = 0.015), and equipment problems increased (p = 0.036). However, the rate of adverse events requiring conversion significantly decreased with time (p < 0.001). Patients with an intraoperative adverse event had a significantly higher rate of postoperative local and general morbidity (41.2 and 32.9 % vs. 18.0 and 17.2 %, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative surgical complications and adverse events in laparoscopic colorectal resections did not change significantly over time and are associated with an increased postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477638     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1156-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  30 in total

1.  Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Roberto Rimonda; Marco Ettore Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

Review 4.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery.

Authors:  Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Sanket Srinivasa; Ian P Bissett; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer in Germany 2000-2009.

Authors:  P Mroczkowski; S Hac; B Smith; U Schmidt; H Lippert; R Kube
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Complications and conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicenter Brazilian trial.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Selim Dincler; Peter Buchmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Neudecker; F Klein; R Bittner; T Carus; A Stroux; W Schwenk
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  A prospective study of the safety and usefulness of a new miniature wide-angle camera: the "BirdView camera system".

Authors:  Yusuke Sumi; Hiroyuki Egi; Minoru Hattori; Takahisa Suzuki; Masakazu Tokunaga; Tomohiro Adachi; Hiroyuki Sawada; Shoichiro Mukai; Yuichi Kurita; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Readmissions after colorectal surgery: not all are equal.

Authors:  Laura Z Hyde; Ahmed M Al-Mazrou; Ben A Kuritzkes; Kunal Suradkar; Neda Valizadeh; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel C Steinemann; Sebastian H Lamm; Andreas Zerz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.