Literature DB >> 21487881

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic colon resection for cancer after implementation of a full-time preceptorship.

Yasir Akmal1, Carissa Bailey, Jeong-Heum Baek, Michelle Metchikian, Alessio Pigazzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is considered long and difficult. The presence of a preceptor may shorten the learning curve of LC and ensure adequate oncologic and short-term results. City of Hope implemented a full-time LC preceptorship between September 2004 and March 2006 with one experienced surgeon assisting other surgeons. We review our outcomes with laparoscopic colon resection for colon adenocarcinoma after implementation of this preceptorship.
METHODS: All cases of laparoscopic colon resection for adenocarcinoma performed from September 2004 to April 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the patients in two groups: group 1 had surgery performed during the preceptorship period from September 2004 to March 2006 (n = 39) and group 2 had procedures done between April 2006 and April 2009 (n = 74). Clinical characteristics evaluated included sex, age, body mass index (BMI), ASA level, and history of previous abdominal surgery. Postoperative variables evaluated included type of operation, conversion to open surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time, stage, number of harvested lymph nodes, time to liquid diet, postoperative stay, complications, and 30-day mortality rate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed based on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients underwent LC for adenocarcinoma during the study period. Mean age and BMI were similar between the groups. There was also no significant difference in conversion rates (10.3% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.77) or total complications (25.6% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.088) between groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a significantly greater number of lymph nodes removed in the post-preceptor period (20.3 vs. 15.8, p = 0.007). The 3-year DFS rate was 96.5%, with a mean follow-up of 22.8 months, and the 3-year OS rate was 88.9%, with mean follow-up of 22.1 months, for the entire cohort.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of a program with a full-time preceptorship can help institutions overcome the challenges of laparoscopic colectomy and achieve acceptable postoperative and oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487881     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1654-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Work loads and practice patterns of general surgeons in the United States, 1995-1997: a report from the American Board of Surgery.

Authors:  W P Ritchie; R S Rhodes; T W Biester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Integrating simulation into a busy residency program.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 3.  Advanced laparoscopic skills acquisition: the case of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Eric C Poulin; Jean Pierre Gagné; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Measuring laparoscopic operative skill in a video trainer.

Authors:  M Black; J C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

9.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sigmoid resection for diverticulitis is more difficult than for malignancies.

Authors:  Maw Stam; W A Draaisma; Pcm Pasker; Ecj Consten; Iamj Broeders
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Medial versus lateral approach in laparoscopic colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Guo-qing Liao; Yu Xia; Zhong-min Zhang; Yang Pan; Sheng Liu; Yi Zhang; Zhong-shu Yan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Single incision laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Nathalie Wong-Chong; Justin J Kelly; George J Nassif; Matthew R Albert; John R T Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Tso Liao; Jin-Tung Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.