Literature DB >> 9539019

The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

S Wolff1.   

Abstract

The first of the regularly reproducible experiments to show that very low doses of ionizing radiation, like very low doses of chemical agents, could induce mechanisms whereby cells become better fit to cope with subsequent exposures to high doses were carried out on the induction of chromosome aberrations in cultures of human lymphocytes. If cells that had been exposed to a very low dose (1 cGy) of X rays were subsequently exposed to a relatively high dose (1 Gy), approximately half as many chromosome breaks were induced. Subsequent experiments showed that this adaptive response to low doses requires a certain minimal dose before it becomes active; occurs only within a relatively small window of dose; is dose-rate dependent; and depends on the genetic constitution of the people or animals exposed, with some being unresponsive. It was further shown that the response to the low-dose preexposure was not instantaneous but took approximately 4 to 6 hr to become fully active, and could be prevented if during this period protein synthesis was inhibited, i.e., a necessary protein (enzyme) was being induced. In fact, subsequent experiments with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis showed new proteins in cells irradiated with 1 to 2 cGy. The adaptation induced by low doses of radiation was therefore attributed to the induction of a novel efficient chromosome break repair mechanism that if active at the time of challenge with high doses would lead to less residual damage. This hypothesis was strengthened by a series of experiments in which it was found that inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase, an enzyme implicated in DNA strand break rejoining, could prevent the adaptive response. Although the phenomenon is well established in cellular systems, it is still problematical as to whether or not it will have any utility in establishing risks of ionizing radiation to humans. Newer experiments have now been carried out on the mechanisms underlying the effect and whether or not the effect can manifest itself as a decrease in the number of induced cancers and radiation-induced mortality. Experiments with restriction enzymes now indicate that double-strand breaks in DNA can be triggering events in adaptation. In addition, preliminary experiments on the survival of whole-body irradiated mice have shown that multiple exposures to low adapting doses can have profound effects on survival, and other experiments have shown that adaptation can affect the induction of thymic lymphoma in irradiated mice. It therefore appears that the initial experiments behind the adaptive response have led to a vigorous worldwide effort to understand the basic mechanisms behind it. This effort is stimulated both by a desire to understand the basic cell biology behind the response and a desire to see if indeed this phenomenon affects the estimation of risks of low-level radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539019      PMCID: PMC1533272          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s1277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  23 in total

1.  Two types of X-ray-induced radioresistance in mice: presence of 4 dose ranges with distinct biological effects.

Authors:  M Yonezawa; J Misonoh; Y Hosokawa
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of X rays to human lymphocytes.

Authors:  J D Shadley; V Afzal; S Wolff
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  The repair of x-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in stimulated and unstimulated human lymphocytes.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Distribution and cloning of eukaryotic mRNAs by means of differential display: refinements and optimization.

Authors:  P Liang; L Averboukh; A B Pardee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine.

Authors:  G Olivieri; J Bodycote; S Wolff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of chromosomal aberrations. II. Utilization of Neurospora endonuclease for the study of aberration production by X-rays in G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycle.

Authors:  A T Natarajan; G Obe; A A van Zeeland; F Palitti; M Meijers; E A Verdegaal-Immerzeel
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Exposure of human lymphocytes to ionizing radiation reduces mutagenesis by subsequent ionizing radiation.

Authors:  B J Sanderson; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Chromosomal responses to ionizing radiation reminiscent of an adaptive response in cultured Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  T Ikushima
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Isolation of x-ray-inducible transcripts from radioresistant human melanoma cells.

Authors:  D A Boothman; M Meyers; N Fukunaga; S W Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Evidence for an adaptive DNA repair pathway in CHO and human skin fibroblast cell lines.

Authors:  L Samson; J L Schwartz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  74 in total

1.  Inverse radiation dose-rate effects on somatic and germ-line mutations and DNA damage rates.

Authors:  M M Vilenchik; A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptive response and split-dose effect of radiation on the survival of mice.

Authors:  Ashu Bhan Tiku; R K Kale
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  J Leslie Redpath
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  DOE program--developing a scientific basis for responses to low-dose exposures: impact on dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; Lezlie Couch
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Very large amounts of radiation are required to produce cancer.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; T Edmond Hui; Lezlie A Couch
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation?

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

10.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.