Literature DB >> 18846261

Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Kanokporn Noy Rithidech1, Bobby R Scott.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that adding a very small gamma-ray dose to a small alpha radiation dose can completely suppress lung cancer induction by alpha radiation (a gamma-ray hormetic effect). Here we investigated the possibility of gamma-ray hormesis during low-dose neutron irradiation, since a small contribution to the total radiation dose from neutrons involves gamma rays. Using binucleated cells with micronuclei (micronucleated cells) among in vitro monoenergetic-neutron-irradiated human lymphocytes as a measure of residual damage, we investigated the influence of the small gamma-ray contribution to the dose on suppressing residual damage. We used residual damage data from previous experiments that involved neutrons with five different energies (0.22-, 0.44-, 1.5-, 5.9-, and 13.7-million electron volts [MeV]). Corresponding gamma-ray contributions to the dose were approximately 1%, 1%, 2%, 6%, and 6%, respectively. Total absorbed radiation doses were 0, 10, 50, and 100 mGy for each neutron source. We demonstrate for the first time a protective effect (reduced residual damage) of the small gamma-ray contribution to the neutron dose. Using similar data for exposure to gamma rays only, we also demonstrate a protective effect of 10 mGy (but not 50 or 100 mGy) related to reducing the frequency of micronucleated cells to below the spontaneous level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma rays; Hormesis; Human Lymphocytes; Micronucleus; Neutrons; X rays

Year:  2008        PMID: 18846261      PMCID: PMC2564764          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.07-024.Rithidech

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  54 in total

1.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Use of the frequencies of micronuclei as quantitative indicators of X-ray-induced chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: comparison of two methods.

Authors:  A Ramalho; I Sunjevaric; A T Natarajan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Micronuclei in X-irradiated human lymphocytes.

Authors:  C Kormos; G J Köteles
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Radiation induction of micronuclei in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  J S Prosser; J E Moquet; D C Lloyd; A A Edwards
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Comparisons of dose-response parameters for radiation-induced acentric fragments and micronuclei observed in cytokinesis-arrested lymphocytes.

Authors:  L G Littlefield; A M Sayer; E L Frome
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  The DNA content of micronuclei induced in mouse bone marrow by gamma-irradiation: evidence that micronuclei arise from acentric chromosomal fragments.

Authors:  J A Heddle; A V Carrano
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Fenech; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Radiation safety in commercial air traffic: a need for further study.

Authors:  J W Wilson; L W Townsend
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  A different perception of the linear, nonthreshold hypothesis for low-dose irradiation.

Authors:  V P Bond; V Benary; C A Sondhaus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures.

Authors:  M Fenech; W P Chang; M Kirsch-Volders; N Holland; S Bonassi; E Zeiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effects of acute low doses of gamma-radiation on erythrocytes membrane.

Authors:  Sherif S Mahmoud; Eman El-Sakhawy; Eman S Abdel-Fatah; Adel M Kelany; Rizk M Rizk
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Augmentation of Neurotoxicity of Anticancer Drugs by X-Ray Irradiation.

Authors:  Giichirou Nakaya; Hiroshi Sakagami; Yukari Koga-Ogawa; Akiyoshi Shiroto; Tadamasa Nobesawa; Daisuke Ueda; Sachie Nakatani; Kenji Kobata; Yosuke Iijima; Shigenobu Tone; Angel David-Gonzalez; Rene Garcia-Contreras; Mineko Tomomura; Shinji Kito; Nobuaki Tamura; Hiroshi Takeshima
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Modification in the expression of Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex in low dose irradiated human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Sompal Singh; Madhu Bala; Raj Kumar; Anil Kumar; S C Dhiman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  No Evidence for the In Vivo Induction of Genomic Instability by Low Doses of CS Gamma Rays in Bone Marrow Cells of BALB/CJ and C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise M Honikel; Elbert B Whorton
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Identification of proteins secreted into the medium by human lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with or without adaptive environments.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Xianyin Lai; Louise Honikel; Paiboon Reungpatthanaphong; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Mean cancer mortality rates in low versus high elevation counties in Texas.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Correcting systemic deficiencies in our scientific infrastructure.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Small γ-Ray Doses Prevent Rather than Increase Lung Tumors in Mice.

Authors:  B R Scott; V R Bruce; K M Gott; J Wilder; T March
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Radiation-stimulated epigenetic reprogramming of adaptive-response genes in the lung: an evolutionary gift for mounting adaptive protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Steven A Belinsky; Shuguang Leng; Yong Lin; Julie A Wilder; Leah A Damiani
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.