Literature DB >> 18648572

Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Charles L Sanders1, Bobby R Scott.   

Abstract

Confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis are passive and active cigarette smoke exposures and radiation hormesis. Significantly increased lung cancer risk from ionizing radiation at lung doses < 1 Gy is not observed in never smokers exposed to ionizing radiations. Residential radon is not a cause of lung cancer in never smokers and may protect against lung cancer in smokers. The risk of lung cancer found in many epidemiological studies was less than the expected risk (hormetic effect) for nuclear weapons and power plant workers, shipyard workers, fluoroscopy patients, and inhabitants of high-dose background radiation. The protective effect was noted for low- and mixed high- and low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiations in both genders. Many studies showed a protection factor (PROFAC) > 0.40 (40% avoided) against the occurrence of lung cancer. The ubiquitous nature of the radiation hormesis response in cellular, animal, and epidemio-logical studies negates the healthy worker effect as an explanation for radiation hormesis. Low-dose radiation may stimulate DNA repair/apoptosis and immunity to suppress and eliminate cigarette-smoke-induced transformed cells in the lung, reducing lung cancer occurrence in smokers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hormesis; Lung Cancer; Smoking

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648572      PMCID: PMC2477723          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-003.Sanders

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  137 in total

1.  Residential radon and lung cancer risk in a high-exposure area of Gansu Province, China.

Authors:  Zuoyuan Wang; Jay H Lubin; Longde Wang; Shouzhi Zhang; John D Boice; Hongxing Cui; Shurong Zhang; Susan Conrath; Ying Xia; Bing Shang; Alina Brenner; Suwen Lei; Catherine Metayer; Jisheng Cao; Katherine W Chen; Shujie Lei; Ruth A Kleinerman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Characteristics of the healthy worker effect.

Authors:  J Baillargeon
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Hormesis: the dose-response revolution.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Linda A Baldwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Chernobyl: an overlooked aspect?

Authors:  Keith Baverstock; Dillwyn Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Residential radon exposure and lung cancer: an overview of ongoing studies.

Authors:  J S Neuberger
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Lung cancer and internal lung doses among plutonium workers at the Rocky Flats Plant: a case-control study.

Authors:  Shannon C Brown; Margaret F Schonbeck; David McClure; Anna E Barón; William C Navidi; Tim Byers; A James Ruttenber
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: a combined analysis of 7 North American case-control studies.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Jay H Lubin; Jan M Zielinski; Michael Alavanja; Vanessa S Catalan; R William Field; Judith B Klotz; Ernest G Létourneau; Charles F Lynch; Joseph I Lyon; Dale P Sandler; Janet B Schoenberg; Daniel J Steck; Jan A Stolwijk; Clarice Weinberg; Homer B Wilcox
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Cancer mortality risk among workers at the Mayak nuclear complex.

Authors:  N S Shilnikova; D L Preston; E Ron; E S Gilbert; E K Vassilenko; S A Romanov; I S Kuznetsova; M E Sokolnikov; P V Okatenko; V V Kreslov; N A Koshurnikova
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Cohort study of Air Canada pilots: mortality, cancer incidence, and leukemia risk.

Authors:  P R Band; N D Le; R Fang; M Deschamps; A J Coldman; R P Gallagher; J Moody
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Cancer mortality in relation to monitoring for radionuclide exposure in three UK nuclear industry workforces.

Authors:  L M Carpenter; C D Higgins; A J Douglas; N E Maconochie; R Z Omar; P Fraser; V Beral; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: biophysical aspects.

Authors:  Sergei V Jargin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Residential radon appears to prevent lung cancer.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Low-dose-radiation stimulated natural chemical and biological protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low-dose gamma-radiation inhibits benzo[a]pyrene-induced lung adenoma development in a/j mice.

Authors:  Veronica R Bruce; Steven A Belinsky; Katherine Gott; Yushi Liu; Thomas March; Bobby Scott; Julie Wilder
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Small γ-Ray Doses Prevent Rather than Increase Lung Tumors in Mice.

Authors:  B R Scott; V R Bruce; K M Gott; J Wilder; T March
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Radiation-stimulated epigenetic reprogramming of adaptive-response genes in the lung: an evolutionary gift for mounting adaptive protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Steven A Belinsky; Shuguang Leng; Yong Lin; Julie A Wilder; Leah A Damiani
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.