Literature DB >> 21909285

Reasons why current speech-enhancement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions.

Philipos C Loizou1, Gibak Kim.   

Abstract

Existing speech enhancement algorithms can improve speech quality but not speech intelligibility, and the reasons for that are unclear. In the present paper, we present a theoretical framework that can be used to analyze potential factors that can influence the intelligibility of processed speech. More specifically, this framework focuses on the fine-grain analysis of the distortions introduced by speech enhancement algorithms. It is hypothesized that if these distortions are properly controlled, then large gains in intelligibility can be achieved. To test this hypothesis, intelligibility tests are conducted with human listeners in which we present processed speech with controlled speech distortions. The aim of these tests is to assess the perceptual effect of the various distortions that can be introduced by speech enhancement algorithms on speech intelligibility. Results with three different enhancement algorithms indicated that certain distortions are more detrimental to speech intelligibility degradation than others. When these distortions were properly controlled, however, large gains in intelligibility were obtained by human listeners, even by spectral-subtractive algorithms which are known to degrade speech quality and intelligibility.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909285      PMCID: PMC3169296          DOI: 10.1109/TASL.2010.2045180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process        ISSN: 1558-7916


  12 in total

1.  Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.

Authors:  Jianfen Ma; Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Jerrica Kettel; Richard Hurtig
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Yang Lu; Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions.

Authors:  C V Pavlovic
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  C V Pavlovic; G A Studebaker; R L Sherbecoe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation updates: the Dallas Cochlear Implant Program.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Lana Britt; Ann Geers; Philip Loizou; Betty Loy; Peter Roland; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Charles G Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Zhuo Chen; Jose Herrero; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Jianfen Ma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evaluation of the importance of time-frequency contributions to speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Chengzhu Yu; Kamil K Wójcicki; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen; Michael T Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech enhancement for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Dongmei Wang; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Quantifying the Range of Signal Modification in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Varsha Rallapalli; Melinda Anderson; James Kates; Lauren Balmert; Lynn Sirow; Kathryn Arehart; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Impact of SNR and Gain-Function Over- and Under-estimation on Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Transient and sustained cortical activity elicited by connected speech of varying intelligibility.

Authors:  Hannu Tiitinen; Ismo Miettinen; Paavo Alku; Patrick J C May
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.