| Literature DB >> 18611278 |
Agathe Bourgogne1, Danielle A Garsin, Xiang Qin, Kavindra V Singh, Jouko Sillanpaa, Shailaja Yerrapragada, Yan Ding, Shannon Dugan-Rocha, Christian Buhay, Hua Shen, Guan Chen, Gabrielle Williams, Donna Muzny, Arash Maadani, Kristina A Fox, Jason Gioia, Lei Chen, Yue Shang, Cesar A Arias, Sreedhar R Nallapareddy, Meng Zhao, Vittal P Prakash, Shahreen Chowdhury, Huaiyang Jiang, Richard A Gibbs, Barbara E Murray, Sarah K Highlander, George M Weinstock.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis has emerged as a major hospital pathogen. To explore its diversity, we sequenced E. faecalis strain OG1RF, which is commonly used for molecular manipulation and virulence studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18611278 PMCID: PMC2530867 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Figure 1Map of the OG1RF chromosome. The following features are displayed (from the inside out): restriction maps using SfiI, AscI, and NotI (black) from Murray et al. [10] overlaid with the digestion profile predicted from the sequence (red); G+C content in percentage in green; the total OG1RF-unique genes are shown in purple with those in (+) orientation labeled in blue, and those in (-) orientation labeled in red.
General features of OG1RF compared to V583
| V583 | OG1RF | ||
| General features | |||
| Size (base pairs) | 3,218,031 | 2,739,633 | |
| G+C content (%) | 37.5 | 37.8 | |
| rRNA genes | 12 | 12 | |
| tRNA genes | 68 | 58 | |
| Genes common to both strains | 2,474* | ||
| Genes unique to OG1RF | |||
| Similar to known proteins | 114† | ||
| Conserved hypotheticals | 50 | ||
| No database match | 63 | ||
| Total | 227 | ||
| Total number of ORFs | 3,113 | 2,701‡ |
*The assessment of the genes common to both strains is based on the homology at the DNA level with the ORFs described for V583 (source TIGR [70]). The BLASTN cutoff e-value was 1e-5. †This number includes the proteins with domain polymorphism (see text for details). ‡Estimated number of ORFs calculated by adding the OG1RF-unique ORFs to the number of ORFs shared with V583.
Figure 2Dot plot of OG1RF versus V583 generated by BLASTN. The dot plot was generated by aligning the OR1RF genome against the V583 genome using BLASTN (e-value 1e-10). The alignment pairs were plotted according to their genome coordinates. The visible areas of divergences are labeled using 'Δ ' to indicate a sequence absent in OG1RF and '∇ ' to indicate a sequence unique to OG1RF (locus tag OG1_xxxx) when compared with V583 (locus tag EFxxxx). Phages 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of V583 (φ1 to 7; see [31]) and the PAI locations, all of which are missing from OG1RF, are also indicated.
Figure 3The two CRISPR loci of OG1RF. (a) The CRISPR1 locus. The CRISPR1 element is represented with a hatched box while the CRISPR1 associated genes are represented in orange; the white arrows indicate ORFs present in both OG1RF and V583. The black diamonds represent the 37 bp repeat sequences, while the open boxes with a number indicate the 29 bp unique sequences. (b) The CRISPR2 locus containing only a CRISPR element. (c) CRISPR consensus and unique sequences. The underlined bases indicate mismatches at these locations. The sequences numbered 1 to 14 represent the unique sequences located in the CRISPR1 and CRISPR2 elements.
Frequency of the CRISPR locus among E. faecalis
| Name | Other | Origin | Source/reference | MLST | ErmR* | VanR† | cas‡ | EF0672-3§ |
| TX4002 | OG1RF | Human | [ | 1 | - | - | + | - |
| TX2708 | V583 | Clinical isolate | [ | 6¶ | + | + | - | + |
| TX2144 | E1840 | Clinical isolate | Ruiz-Garbajosa P.# | 40 | + | - | + | - |
| TX2135 | E1795 | Hospital survey | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 44 | - | - | - | + |
| TX2137 | E1798 | Hospital survey | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 16 | + | - | + | - |
| TX2141 | E1825 | Clinical isolate | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 25 | - | - | - | + |
| TX2140 | E1803 | Hospital survey | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 38 | - | - | - | + |
| TX2138 | E1801 | Hospital survey | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 48 | - | - | - | + |
| TX2146 | E1844 | Clinical isolate | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 61 | - | - | - | + |
| TX2139 | E1802 | Hospital survey | Ruiz-Garbajosa P. | 35 | + | - | + | - |
| TX4240 | A0826 | Pig | Jensen L. | 98 | + | - | + | - |
| TX4247 | E1876 | Pig | Gaastra W. | 20 | + | - | + | - |
| TX4245 | E1872 | Dog | Gaastra W. | 16 | + | - | + | - |
| TX4243 | E0252 | Calf | Mevius D. | 23 | + | + | - | + |
| TX4255 | A0808 | Clinical isolate | Kawalec M. | 88 | - | - | - | + |
| TX4259 | A1006 | Clinical isolate | Kawalec M. | 135 | - | - | - | + |
*Erythromycin resistance was tested at 5 μg/ml. †Vancomycin resistance was tested at 10 μg/ml. ‡Two sets of primers were used to detect the cas genes (cas1 and csn1). §This set of primers amplifies the junction between EF0672 and EF0673 where the CRISPR1 locus is inserted in OG1RF. ¶CC2. # Ruiz-Garbajosa P. (Spain), Jensen L. (Denmark), Gaastra W. and Mevius D. (Netherland), and Kawalec M. (Poland).
OG1RF-unique regulators
| OG1RF | Description | Best hit | Size* | Comments |
| OG1RF_0070 | Transcriptional regulator | 116512576 | 102 | - |
| OG1RF_0073 | LytR family response regulator | 81428169 | 151 | - |
| OG1RF_0120 | BglG family transcriptional antiterminator | 47095712 | 494 | Probable regulator of the downstream PTS system |
| OG1RF_0138 | Transcriptional regulator | 116493423 | 219 | Probable transcriptional regulator of the downstream ABC superfamily transporter |
| OG1RF_0143 | GntR family transcriptional regulator | 82745913 | 236 | Probable regulator of the downstream PTS system |
| OG1RF_0175 | DNA binding protein | 15890504 | 293 | Probable regulator of the |
| OG1RF_0192 | Sensor histidine kinase VanSG | 119635646 | 371 | Best homology with VanG and |
| OG1RF_0193 | Response regulator VanRG | 119635645 | 235 | VanG2 two-component systems. |
| OG1RF_0192 and OG1RF_0193 appear cotranscribed with a gene encoding a M15 family muramoylpentapeptide carboxypeptidase | ||||
| OG1RF_0198 | Response regulator | 47567135 | 240 | Best homology with AgrA from |
| OG1RF_0199 | Sensor histidine kinase | 47567134 | 443 | Best homology with AgrC from |
| OG1RF_0220 | Probable endoribonuclease MazF | 69244828 | 114 | Toxin-antitoxin described in |
| OG1EF_0221 | Probable antitoxin MazE | 69244829 | 77 |
*Amino acids
Figure 4Two-component systems unique to OG1RF. (a) Two-component system with homology to the VanG system. (b) Two-component system with homology to the comCD genes of S. pneumoniae. The two-component system (OG1RF_0198 and OG1RF_0199) is indicated in light blue; the two ORFs encoding potential transporter proteins (OG1RF_0200 and OG1RF_0201) are represented in pink. In green are indicated two small ORFs encoding polypeptides of less than 51 amino acids. The white arrows indicate ORFs also present in V583.
Figure 5The iol operon. The iol genes are labeled based on the homology/conserved motif of their encoded proteins with known enzymes necessary for myo-inositol degradation. For all strains, the described or probable regulator is represented in blue. E. faecalis OG1RF: the iol operon is represented in yellow, OG1RF_0166 (green arrow) located downstream of the iol operon encodes a probable PTS IIC component, while the white arrows indicate ORFs also present in V583. For B. subtilis 168, C. perfringens strain 13, and L. casei BL23, the iol genes are represented in green, orange and purple, respectively. C. perfringens iol mRNA transcript includes five other genes encoding proteins whose functions do not appear to be related to myo-inositol degradation; these genes are represented in gray.
Figure 6The OG1RF competence operon and its similarity with the competence operon of S. mutans. The ORFs essential for natural competence in S. mutans are shown in green as well as their homologues in OG1RF and V583. The ORF corresponding to the homologue of ComYD was not described in V583 [4], due to the presence of a probable prophage (EF1986-EF2043). The premature stop codon in EF1984 in V583 is indicated with an asterisk. ackA/EF1983 is represented in orange. The proteins encoded by the ORFs represented in white do not share any features of the known competence proteins or homology between S. mutans and E. faecalis; in S. mutans, ackA and ytxK are co-transcribed with the comY genes [47].
Figure 7Comparison of OG1RF and V583 in a mouse urinary tract infection model. (a) Mixed infection by wild-type E. faecalis strains OG1RF and V583 in the kidneys and urinary bladders of mice (n = 21; competition assay). Data are expressed as the log10(CFU)/gm for OG1RF or V583; the log10(CFU)/gm for both kidneys were combined and averaged from two independent experiments. Black solid diamonds and triangles represent E. faecalis strains OG1RF and V583, respectively, for kidney homogenates, and empty diamonds and triangles represent OG1RF and V583, respectively, for urinary bladder homogenates. Horizontal bars represent geometric means. Log10(CFU) were compared for statistical significance by the paired t-test. The minimum detection limit in these experiments was 101 and 102 CFU/gm of kidney and urinary bladder homogenates, respectively. (b) Mono-infection using E. faecalis strains OG1RF or V583 in the kidneys of mice (103 CFU per mice, n = 9). Data are expressed as log10(CFU)/gm for OG1RF recovered from kidney homogenates 48 h after infection; the log10(CFU)/gm for a kidney pair were combined and averaged. Black and white triangles represent OG1RF and V583, respectively. Horizontal bars represent geometric means. The CFU of V583 recovered from kidneys was significantly reduced compared to the CFU of OG1RF, as determined by the unpaired t-test.