Literature DB >> 16980489

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of Enterococcus faecalis: identification of genes absent from food strains.

E Lepage1, S Brinster, C Caron, Céline Ducroix-Crepy, L Rigottier-Gois, G Dunny, C Hennequet-Antier, P Serror.   

Abstract

Enterococcus faecalis, a member of the natural microbiota of animal and human intestinal tracts, is also present as a natural contaminant in a variety of fermented foods. Over the last decade, E. faecalis has emerged as a major cause of nosocomial infections. We investigated the genetic diversity in 30 clinical and food isolates, including strains V583 and MMH594, in order to determine whether clinical and food isolates could be distinguished. Data were obtained using comparative genomic hybridization and specific PCR with a total of 202 probes of E. faecalis, selected using the available V583 genome sequence and part of the MMH594 pathogenicity island. The cognate genes encoded mainly exported proteins. Hybridization data were analyzed by a two-component mixture model that estimates the probability of any given gene to be either present or absent in the strains. A total of 78 genes were found to be variable, as they were absent in at least one isolate. Most of the variable genes were clustered in regions that, in the published V583 sequence, related to prophages or mobile genetic elements. The variable genes were distributed in three main groups: (i) genes equally distributed between clinical and dairy food isolates, (ii) genes absent from dairy food-related isolates, and (iii) genes present in MMH594 and V583 strains only. Further analysis of the distribution of the last gene group in 70 other isolates confirmed that six of the probed genes were always absent in dairy food-related isolates, whereas they were detected in clinical and/or commensal isolates. Two of them corresponded to prophages that were not detected in the cognate isolates, thus possibly extending the number of genes absent from dairy food isolates. Genes specifically detected in clinical isolates may prove valuable for the development of new risk assessment markers for food safety studies and for identification of new factors that may contribute to host colonization or infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16980489      PMCID: PMC1595521          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00421-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  52 in total

1.  A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data.

Authors:  G J McLachlan; R W Bean; D Peel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Modulation of virulence within a pathogenicity island in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Nathan Shankar; Arto S Baghdayan; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The ICESt1 element of Streptococcus thermophilus belongs to a large family of integrative and conjugative elements that exchange modules and change their specificity of integration.

Authors:  Vincent Burrus; Guillaume Pavlovic; Bernard Decaris; Gérard Guédon
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Improved analytical methods for microarray-based genome-composition analysis.

Authors:  Charles C Kim; Elizabeth A Joyce; Kaman Chan; Stanley Falkow
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Intravenous mouse infection model for studying the pathology of Enterococcus faecalis infections.

Authors:  Claudia Gentry-Weeks; Monica Estay; Cindy Loui; Dale Baker
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Molecular characterization of a widespread, pathogenic, and antibiotic resistance-receptive Enterococcus faecalis lineage and dissemination of its putative pathogenicity island.

Authors:  Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Huang Wenxiang; George M Weinstock; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Molecular diagnosis of infective endocarditis by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of DNA from valve tissue.

Authors:  Valérie Gauduchon; Lara Chalabreysse; Jerome Etienne; Marie Célard; Yvonne Benito; Hubert Lepidi; Françoise Thivolet-Béjui; François Vandenesch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Bacteremia caused by hemolytic, high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  M M Huycke; C A Spiegel; M S Gilmore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Genomic comparison of Salmonella enterica serovars and Salmonella bongori by use of an S. enterica serovar typhimurium DNA microarray.

Authors:  Kaman Chan; Stephen Baker; Charles C Kim; Corrella S Detweiler; Gordon Dougan; Stanley Falkow
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  BioArray Software Environment (BASE): a platform for comprehensive management and analysis of microarray data.

Authors:  Lao H Saal; Carl Troein; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Sofia Gruvberger; Ake Borg; Carsten Peterson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  25 in total

1.  Survey of genomic diversity among Enterococcus faecalis strains by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Agot Aakra; O Ludvig Nyquist; Lars Snipen; Turid S Reiersen; Ingolf F Nes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Characterization of three lactic acid bacteria and their isogenic ldh deletion mutants shows optimization for YATP (cell mass produced per mole of ATP) at their physiological pHs.

Authors:  Tomas Fiedler; Martijn Bekker; Maria Jonsson; Ibrahim Mehmeti; Anja Pritzschke; Nikolai Siemens; Ingolf Nes; Jeroen Hugenholtz; Bernd Kreikemeyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  C-terminal WxL domain mediates cell wall binding in Enterococcus faecalis and other gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Sophie Brinster; Sylviane Furlan; Pascale Serror
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Horizontal gene transfer and the genomics of enterococcal antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Kelli L Palmer; Veronica N Kos; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 7.934

5.  Influx of enterococci and associated antibiotic resistance and virulence genes from ready-to-eat food to the human digestive tract.

Authors:  Lilia Macovei; Ludek Zurek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Five genes encoding surface-exposed LPXTG proteins are enriched in hospital-adapted Enterococcus faecium clonal complex 17 isolates.

Authors:  Antoni P A Hendrickx; Willem J B van Wamel; George Posthuma; Marc J M Bonten; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Comparative genomics and transduction potential of Enterococcus faecalis temperate bacteriophages.

Authors:  Azra Yasmin; John G Kenny; Jayendra Shankar; Alistair C Darby; Neil Hall; Clive Edwards; Malcolm J Horsburgh
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  CRISPRs of Enterococcus faecalis and E. hirae isolates from pig feces have species-specific repeats but share some common spacer sequences.

Authors:  Isha Katyal; Bonnie Chaban; Beata Ng; Janet E Hill
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Crucial role for insertion sequence elements in Lactobacillus helveticus evolution as revealed by interstrain genomic comparison.

Authors:  Pawel Kaleta; John O'Callaghan; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Thomas P Beresford; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Genetic variation and evolution of the pathogenicity island of Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Shonna M McBride; Phillip S Coburn; Arto S Baghdayan; Rob J L Willems; Maria J Grande; Nathan Shankar; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.