Literature DB >> 8914314

Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise.

W A Yost1.   

Abstract

Two versions of a cascade add, attenuate, and delay circuit were used to generate iterated rippled noise (IRN) stimuli. IRN stimuli produce a repetition pitch whose pitch strength relative to the noise percept can be varied by changing the type of circuit, the attenuation, or the number of iterations in the circuit. Listeners were asked to use pitch strength to discriminate between various pairs of IRN stimuli which differed in the type of network used to generate the sounds, the number of iterations, and the attenuation in the network. A description based on an exponential function of the first peak of the autocorrelation function of IRN stimuli is consistent with the results. The discrimination data were well fit by a function based on the difference in the exponential functions of the first peak of the autocorrelation functions. A magnitude estimation experiment indicated that pitch strength was an exponential function of the height of the first peak in the autocorrelation function. These results suggest that the strength of the pitch of IRN stimuli is based on temporal processing as might be revealed by autocorrelation.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8914314     DOI: 10.1121/1.416973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins; Supraja Anand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

Review 4.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

5.  Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals.

Authors:  William A Yost; Dan Mapes-Riordan; William Shofner; Raymond Dye; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  Experience-dependent neural plasticity is sensitive to shape of pitch contours.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Iterated rippled noise discrimination at long durations.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.