Literature DB >> 15649605

Pitch detection of dynamic iterated rippled noise by humans and a modified auditory model.

Susan Denham1.   

Abstract

Iterated ripple noise (IRN) is a broadband noise with temporal regularities, which can give rise to a perceptible pitch. Since the perceptual pitch to noise ratio of these stimuli can be altered without substantially altering their spectral content, they have been useful in exploring the role of temporal processing in pitch perception [Yost, W.A., 1996. Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (5), 3329-3335; Patterson, R.D., Handel, S.,Yost, W.A., Datta, A.J., 1996. The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (5), 3286-3294]. A generalised IRN algorithm is presented, in which multiple time varying temporal correlations can be defined. The resulting time varying pitches are perceptually very salient. It is also possible to segregate and track multiple simultaneous time varying pitches in these stimuli. Temporal auditory models have previously been shown to account for the perception of IRNs with static delays [Patterson, R.D., Handel, S.,Yost, W.A., Datta, A.J., 1996. The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (5), 3286-3294]. Here we show that some simple modifications to one such model [Meddis R., Hewitt, M.J., 1991. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery I. Pitch identification, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2866-2882] allow it to track moving correlations, and also improve its performance in response to static correlations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15649605     DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Experience-dependent neural plasticity is sensitive to shape of pitch contours.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Inhibition in the auditory brainstem enhances signal representation and regulates gain in complex acoustic environments.

Authors:  Christian Keine; Rudolf Rübsamen; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Depth electrode recordings show double dissociation between pitch processing in lateral Heschl's gyrus and sound onset processing in medial Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 9.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Understanding pitch perception as a hierarchical process with top-down modulation.

Authors:  Emili Balaguer-Ballester; Nicholas R Clark; Martin Coath; Katrin Krumbholz; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.