Literature DB >> 18562137

Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Gabriella Musacchia1, Dana Strait, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Musicians have a variety of perceptual and cortical specializations compared to non-musicians. Recent studies have shown that potentials evoked from primarily brainstem structures are enhanced in musicians, compared to non-musicians. Specifically, musicians have more robust representations of pitch periodicity and faster neural timing to sound onset when listening to sounds or both listening to and viewing a speaker. However, it is not known whether musician-related enhancements at the subcortical level are correlated with specializations in the cortex. Does musical training shape the auditory system in a coordinated manner or in disparate ways at cortical and subcortical levels? To answer this question, we recorded simultaneous brainstem and cortical evoked responses in musician and non-musician subjects. Brainstem response periodicity was related to early cortical response timing across all subjects, and this relationship was stronger in musicians. Peaks of the brainstem response evoked by sound onset and timbre cues were also related to cortical timing. Neurophysiological measures at both levels correlated with musical skill scores across all subjects. In addition, brainstem and cortical measures correlated with the age musicians began their training and the years of musical practice. Taken together, these data imply that neural representations of pitch, timing and timbre cues and cortical response timing are shaped in a coordinated manner, and indicate corticofugal modulation of subcortical afferent circuitry.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18562137      PMCID: PMC2701624          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  49 in total

1.  Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time.

Authors:  G C Galbraith; B C Chae; J R Cooper; M M Gindi; T N Ho; B S Kim; D A Mankowski; S E Lunde
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians.

Authors:  C Pantev; L E Roberts; M Schulz; A Engelien; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Functional anatomy of musical perception in musicians.

Authors:  T Ohnishi; H Matsuda; T Asada; M Aruga; M Hirakata; M Nishikawa; A Katoh; E Imabayashi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Perceptual training: a tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it.

Authors:  M Ahissar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga; Xiaofeng Ma
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians.

Authors:  Peter Schneider; Michael Scherg; H Günter Dosch; Hans J Specht; Alexander Gutschalk; André Rupp
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Assessment of fine motor skill in musicians and nonmusicians: differences in timing versus sequence accuracy in a bimanual fingering task.

Authors:  Anthony E Kincaid; Scott Duncan; Samuel A Scott
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2002-08

8.  Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Christian Gaser; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.

Authors:  Yisheng Xu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response.

Authors:  Gary C Galbraith; Darlene M Olfman; Todd M Huffman
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  80 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

7.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.