Literature DB >> 18547441

Sensitive and rapid detection of cholera toxin-producing Vibrio cholerae using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Wataru Yamazaki1, Kazuko Seto, Masumi Taguchi, Masanori Ishibashi, Kiyoshi Inoue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vibrio cholerae is widely acknowledged as one of the most important waterborne pathogen causing gastrointestinal disorders. Cholera toxin (CT) is a major virulence determinant of V. cholerae. Detection of CT-producing V. cholerae using conventional culture-, biochemical- and immunological-based assays is time-consuming and laborious, requiring more than three days. Thus, we developed a novel and highly specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the sensitive and rapid detection of cholera toxin (CT)-producing Vibrio cholerae.
RESULTS: The assay provided markedly more sensitive and rapid detection of CT-producing V. cholerae strains than conventional biochemical and PCR assays. The assay correctly identified 34 CT-producing V. cholerae strains, but did not detect 13 CT non-producing V. cholerae and 53 non-V. cholerae strains. Sensitivity of the LAMP assay for direct detection of CT-producing V. cholerae in spiked human feces was 7.8 x 102 CFU per g (1.4 CFU per reaction). The sensitivity of the LAMP assay was 10-fold more sensitive than that of the conventional PCR assay. The LAMP assay for detection of CT-producing V. cholerae required less than 35 min with a single colony on thiosulfate citrate bile salt sucrose (TCBS) agar and 70 min with human feces from the beginning of DNA extraction to final determination.
CONCLUSION: The LAMP assay is a sensitive, rapid and simple tool for the detection of CT-producing V. cholerae and will be useful in facilitating the early diagnosis of human V. cholerae infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18547441      PMCID: PMC2446398          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


Background

Vibrio cholerae is widely acknowledged as one of the most important waterborne pathogen causing gastrointestinal disorders. Cholera toxin (CT) is a major virulence determinant of V. cholerae. This bacterium is indigenous to fresh and blackish water environments in tropical, subtropical and temperate areas worldwide, the threat of epidemic cholera is restricted primarily to developing countries with warm climates [1-3]. V. cholerae causes seafood borne infection, water-borne outbreaks and epidemics in terrestrial environments [1,3]. Therefore, ingestion of raw or undercooked seafood such as shrimp and drinking water contaminated with V. cholera are risk factors in humans [1-3]. Most V. cholerae isolates from the environment do not produce CT, nor do they possess the genetic potential to produce CT. V. cholerae O1 and O139 are the major seroytpes associated with illness, and some V. cholerae non-O1 and non-O139 isolates produce CT. These findings necessitate regular examination of V. cholerae isolates for their ability to produce CT in order to assess their clinical significance [3,4]. Detection of CT-producing V. cholerae using conventional culture-, biochemical- and immunological-based assays is time-consuming and laborious, requiring more than three days. Commercially available kits can not distinguish between the heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) of Escherichia coli and CT. A rapid, reliable and practical assay for the detection of CT-producing V. cholerae has thus been sought. Several PCR assays offer a more sophisticated approach to the identification of Vibrio cholerae [4,5]. Although PCR assays provide more rapid identification of Vibrio cholerae than conventional assays, they require the use of electrophoresis to detect amplified products, which is time-consuming and tedious. Real time PCR assays recently developed for the rapid identification of Vibrio cholerae [2,6] are not routinely used due to their requirement for an expensive thermal cycler with a fluorescence detector. Among other techniques, however, one promising candidate is a novel nucleic acid amplification method termed loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [7]. LAMP is based on the principle of autocycling strand displacement DNA synthesis performed by the Bst DNA polymerase large fragment for the detection of a specific DNA sequence with specific characteristics [8]. This offers a number of advantages: first, all reactions can be carried out under isothermal conditions ranging from 60 to 65°C; second, its use of six primers recognizing eight distinct regions on the target nucleotides means that specificity is extremely high [9]; and third, detection is simplified by visual assessment using the unaided eye, without the need for electrophoresis [10,11]. Thus, LAMP assay is faster and easier to perform than conventional PCR assays, as well as being more specific [12,13]. Furthermore, because the LAMP assay synthesizes a large amount of DNA, the products can be detected by simple turbidity. Thus, compared to PCR assays, expensive equipment is not necessary to give a high level of precision [10,12,13]. These features allow simple, rapid and cost-effective detection [13,14]. Also, the increase in the turbidity of the reaction mixture according to the production of precipitate correlates with the amount of DNA synthesized [10,11]. Various LAMP assays for the identification of pathogenic organisms have been developed [10-13,15,16], however, no assay for the detection of CT-producing V. cholerae has been described. Here, we describe a sensitive, rapid and simple LAMP assay for the detection of CT-producing Vibrio cholerae. Sensitivity was determined in pure cultures and spiked human feces.

Results

LAMP products were detected from all 34 CT-producing V. cholerae strains. No LAMP products were detected from any of the 13 CT non-producing V. cholerae and 53 non-V. cholerae strains (Table 1). The PCR assay required more than 4 h, while the LAMP assay was markedly faster, requiring for amplification 12–18 min with a single colony on TCBS agar from each of 34 CT-producing V. cholerae strains and less than 45 min with spiked human feces (Fig. 1). The assay required less than 35 min and 70 min for detection of CT-producing V. cholerae with a colony on TCBS agar and with spiked human feces from the beginning of DNA extraction to final determination.
Table 1

Results of the LAMP assay

SpeciesStrainsNo. of strainsLAMP resultsProduction of CT/LTSource
Vibrio cholerae O126
61H151++Human feces, Japan?, 1986
4H77++Human feces, Thailand, 1992
5H176++Human feces, Indonesia, 1993
5H332++Human feces, Indonesia, 1993
6H58++Human feces, Thailand, 1994
6H62++Human feces, Unknown, 1994
6H346++Human feces, Indonesia, 1994
7H164++Human feces, Indonesia, 1995
7H285++Human feces, Japan, 1995
8H215++Human feces, Japan, 1996
9H3++Human feces, Thailand, 1997
10H1++Human feces, China, 1998
10H169++Human feces, Philippines, 1998
10H664++Human feces, Philippines, 1999
11H215++Human feces, India, 1999
11H558++Human feces, Madagascar, 2000
13H59++Human feces, Indonesia, 2001
13H82++Human feces, Japan, 2001
13H173++Human feces, Japan, 2001
13H257++Human feces, Indonesia, 2001
15H245++Human feces, Thailand, 2004
17H16++Human feces, Indonesia, 2005
18H24++Human feces, India, 2006
62H92--Human feces, Japan?, 1987
2H283--Human feces, Indonesia, 1991
11H259--Human feces, Egypt/Greece, 1999
Vibrio cholerae O13913
236-93++Human, India, 1993
1034-93++Human, Pakistan, 1993
183-93++Human, Bangladesh, 1993
21-93++Human, Chennai, India, 1993
65-93++Human, Kolkata, India, 1993
481-93++Human, Thailand, 1993
495-96++Human, Nepal, 1996
99-93++Human, Vellore, India, 1993
147-93++Human, Madurai, India, 1993
VC-23++Unknown, 1995
333-93++Pond, India, 1993
1033-93--Human, Sri Lanka, 1993
Arg-3--Human, Argentine
Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O1398
61H37--Human feces, Thailand, 1986
3H264--Human feces, Indonesia, 1992
5H231--Human feces, Indonesia, 1993
9H237--Human feces, China, 1997
9H300--Human feces, India, 1997
12H207--Human feces, 2000
19H149--Human feces, 2007
3H222--Clam, Japan, 1991
LT-producing E. coli7- (0/7)+ (7/7)Human feces, Japan
V. parahaemolyticus6-NDHuman feces, Japan
V. vulnificus3-NDIFO15645T and human feces, Japan
V. alginolyticus2-NDIFO15630T and unknown source
V. fluvialis1-NDHuman feces
V. furnissii1-NDHuman feces
V. harveyi1-NDIFO15634T
V. metschnikovii1-NDHuman feces
V. mimicus1-NDHuman feces
Other bacteria30-NDDescribed in Methods.

+, positive reaction; -, negative reaction (positive number/strain number tested); ND, not determined.

Figure 1

Sensitivity test for detection of CT-producing . The curves from left to right indicate decreasing concentrations of CFU from bacterial colonies [1.41 to 1.4-1CFU per reaction].

Sensitivity test for detection of CT-producing . The curves from left to right indicate decreasing concentrations of CFU from bacterial colonies [1.41 to 1.4-1CFU per reaction]. Results of the LAMP assay +, positive reaction; -, negative reaction (positive number/strain number tested); ND, not determined. As shown in Table 2, sensitivities of the LAMP assay for CT-producing V. cholerae O1 strain 13H173 with pure cultures and spiked human feces were found to be 7.8 × 102 CFU per ml (2.9 CFU per reaction) and 7.8 × 102 CFU per g (1.4 CFU per reaction). Further, the sensitivity of the LAMP assay was 10-fold higher than that of the PCR assay (Table 2). The dilutions of 10-3-10-4 (14.4 – 1.4 CFU per reaction) showed an increase in turbidity (Fig. 1) and was visible as white turbidity but not that of 10-5 (0.1 CFU per reaction). Sensitivities determined by the two methods were constantly matched with each other.
Table 2

Sensitivity of the LAMP assay for CT-producing V. cholerae

StrainSpecimensDilutions of cultures for the assays

10-210-310-410-5
CT-producing V. cholerae
13H173Pure culturesCFU per reaction288.828.82.90.3
LAMP+++± (2/3)
PCR++± (1/3)-
Spiked human fecesCFU per reaction144.414.41.40.1
LAMP+++-
PCR++--

+, triplicate assay showed all positive.

±, triplicate assay showed both positive and negative (positive number/tested number).

-, triplicate assay showed all negative.

Sensitivity of the LAMP assay for CT-producing V. cholerae +, triplicate assay showed all positive. ±, triplicate assay showed both positive and negative (positive number/tested number). -, triplicate assay showed all negative.

Discussion

The bacterial culture test for the isolation and identification of CT-producing V. cholerae from human feces required 3–4 d, with plating onto selective agars, sequential subculture and CT productivity test. In contrast, the LAMP assay was markedly faster. For PCR assay, 4–5 h is required for amplification, electrophoresis and staining, while the LAMP assay requires for DNA extraction from specimens and amplification less than 35–70 min. Further, amplification of the LAMP assay could be judged by visual assessment using the unaided eye, without the need for electrophoresis. The LAMP assay was more sensitive, rapid and simple than the conventional PCR assay. Therefore, the LAMP assay is more effective in detecting CT-producing V. cholerae than the conventional PCR assay. CT is closely related to LT at the immunological and genetic levels, [4], therefore their discernment is critical. A commercial reversed passive latex agglutination assay kit for the detection of CT/LT is available. However, this kit is unable to discern between CT and LT. Although PCR assays have been shown suitable for the specific detection of the ctx gene without confusing the lt gene [4,5], the procedure is time-consuming and tedious. We therefore developed a new and specific LAMP assay for CT-producing V. cholerae. A primer set based on the ctxA gene was designed to prevent the confusion of CT and LT with highly conserved and specific regions for CT. The sensitivity of the LAMP assay shown in Table 2 seems a little high, and Table 2 indicates detection of 0.3 CFU per reaction in 2/3 replicates. We adopted 6 h-enrichment not to reach stationary phase for the determination of the sensitivity, according to Fedio et al [17]. However, the samples may, to some extent, contain DNAs derived from dead or viable but non-cultivable (VNC) cells [18] in the present study, which may have affected the sensitivity we determined. Further work is needed to confirm this hypothesis. The frequent outbreaks caused by CT-producing V. cholerae in developing countries [1,3] highlight the need for the rapid and accurate identification of the species. We successfully developed the first LAMP assay for detection of CT-producing V. cholerae from spiked human feces. Application of this assay to food and environmental microbiology should facilitate a comprehensive approach to the control of cholera infection and the rapid and sensitive detection of small numbers of CT-producing V. cholerae in food and environmental specimens.

Conclusion

The LAMP assay provided markedly more sensitive, simple and rapid detection of CT-producing V. cholerae than conventional biochemical and PCR assays. Further, it can be applied to the direct detection of CT-producing V. cholerae with spiked human feces. The LAMP assay for detection of CT-producing V. cholerae required less than 35 min with a colony on TCBS agar and 70 min with spiked human feces from the beginning of DNA extraction to final determination. The LAMP assay is a powerful tool for the rapid and sensitive detection of CT-producing V. cholerae, and will facilitate the early diagnosis of cholera in humans.

Methods

Bacterial strains

A total of 100 bacterial strains were used, including 34 CT-producing Vibrio cholerae strains, as well as an additional 13 CT non-producing Vibrio cholerae and 53 non-Vibrio cholerae strains as reference strains and field isolates. The 47 Vibrio cholerae strains are detailed below, and also shown in Table 1. Twenty-six O1, thirteen O139 and eight non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae strains were obtained from clinical patients of overseas travelers and domestic cases, and a food specimen between 1986 and 2007 in Japan. Fifteen non-Vibrio cholerae reference strains were obtained from international culture collections (Arcobacter butzleri ATCC49616T (American Type Culture Collection, USA); Arcobacter cryaerophilus ATCC43158T; Arcobacter skirrowii ATCC51132T; Campylobacter coli JCM2529T (Japan Collection of Microorganisms, Saitama, Japan); Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus ATCC27374T; Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni LMG8841T (Culture Collection of the Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, University of Ghent, Belgium); Campylobacter lari JCM2530T; Campylobacter upsaliensis ATCC43954T; Escherichia coli ATCC25922, and ATCC35218; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853; Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus ATCC25923;Vibrio alginolyticus IFO15630T (Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan); Vibrio harveyi IFO15634T; and Vibrio vulnificus IFO15645T). A superscript T designates a type-strain. Thirteen non-V. cholerae Vibrio strains were obtained from clinical patients or unknown sources, as follows: 6 V. parahaemolyticus, 2 V. vulnificus; and one strain each of V. alginolyticus, V. fluvialis, V. furnissii, V. metschnikovii, and V. mimicus. Twenty-five non-Vibrio strains were obtained from clinical sources, as follows: seven heat-labile enterotoxin (LT)-producing Escherichia coli strains (O25:HNM, O159:H2, O159:H27, O167:HUT, O169:H41, OUT:H12, OUT:HUT); five LT non-producing Escherichia coli; and one strain each of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria, Citrobacter freundii,Enterobacter cloacae, Helicobacter pylori, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Morganella morganii, Plesiomonas shigelloides, Proteus mirabilis,Providensia alcalifaciens, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, Shigella flexneri 1a, and Shigella sonnei.

Storage and culture conditions

All Vibrio strains were stored in Casitone semi-solid broth (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) or cooked meat broth (Becton Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) at room temperature until required. They were grown on thiosulfate citrate bile salt sucrose agar (TCBS agar; Eiken Chemical) and incubated overnight at 35°C. All Arcobacter, Campylobacter and Helicobacter strains were stored in brucella broth (Becton Dickinson) containing 10% (v/v) horse serum and 10% (v/v) DMSO at -80°C, until required. They were grown on blood agar supplemented with 5% (v/v) lysed horse blood, and incubated for 2–3 days in a microaerobic atmosphere, except H. pylori, which was incubated for 10 days. Incubation was at 37°C except A. cryaerophilus, which was grown at 30°C. Other bacterial strains were stored in cooked meat broth at room temperature until required, and grown on blood agar or tryptic soy agar (TSA; Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) and cultured overnight at 37°C. CT/LT productivities of V. cholerae and E. coli strains were determined by a reversed passive latex agglutination assay kit (VET-RPLA; Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) following a manufacturer's instruction.

DNA extraction from culture

Bacterial DNA was extracted as previously described [19] with slight modification. A single loopful of culture on TCBS agar, blood agar or TSA was inoculated in 50 μl of NaOH (25 mmol l-1) in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube using a disposable loop (1-mm diameter), and the cell mixture was heated at 95°C for 5 min. After neutralization with 4 μl of Tris-HCl buffer (1 mol l-1), cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 g, 4°C, for 5 min and the supernatant was used as template DNA for the LAMP assay.

LAMP assay

LAMP assay was performed with a Loopamp DNA amplification kit (Eiken Chemical). The final LAMP assay comprised 2 μl of template DNA, 1 μl of Bst DNA Polymerase (Eiken Chemical), 1.6 μmol l-1 each of inner primers FIP and BIP, 0.2 μmol l-1 each of outer primers F3 and B3, and 0.8 μmol l-1 each of loop primers LoopF and LoopB, in a 1 × Reaction Mix (Eiken Chemical). Final volume was adjusted to 25 μl. All primers were produced by Hokkaido System Science Co., Ltd. (Sapporo, Japan), and designed from sequence data submitted to GenBank (Cholera toxin subunitA gene, ctxA, K02679) [20] with Primer Explorer V4 software (Fujitsu System Solutions Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). To find specific nucleotide sequences of CT-producing V. cholerae, a multiple alignment was determined with analyses of 34 ctxA sequences (AE003852, AF175708, AF390572, AF414369, AF452584, AF463400–AF463401, AF510994–AF510998, AF516341–AF516349, AF542088–AF542089, AJ575590, AY101181, CP000626-CP000627, D30052–D30053, DQ774432, K02679, X00171, X58785–X58786) from DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank data base. The sequences and locations of each primer are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2. Primer FIP consisted of the F1 complementary sequence and the F2 sequence. Primer BIP consisted of the B1 sequence and the B2 complementary sequence. Primer B3 and LF consisted of the B3 and LF complementary sequences, respectively. The mixture was incubated at 65°C for 60 min and then at 80°C for 2 min to terminate the reaction in a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter (LA-320; Teramecs, Kyoto, Japan). LAMP amplification was detected as a value of turbidity at 650 nm using a LA-320 in real-time. The reaction was considered to be positive when the turbidity reached 0.1 within 60 min. Turbidity visible with the unaided eye was also considered to indicate a successful LAMP procedure.
Table 3

LAMP primers used

GenBank accession no.PrimerSequence (5' to 3')Gene location (bp)
K02679CtxA-FIPTCT GTC CTC TTG GCA TAA GAC GCA GAT TCT AGA CCT CCT G (F1c-F2)277-257 (F1c), 217–235(F2)
CtxA-BIPTCA ACC TTT ATG ATC ATG CAA GAG GCT CAA ACT AAT TGA GGT GGA A (B1-B2c)311–335(B1), 395-375(B2c)
CtxA-F3GCA AAT GAT GAT AAG TTA TAT CGG (F3)193–216
CtxA-B3GMC CAG ACA ATA TAG TTT GAC C (B3c)433-412
CtxA-LFCAC CTG ACT GCT TTA TTT CA (LFc)256-237
CtxA-LBAAC TCA GAC GGG ATT TGT TAG G (LB)336–357

All primers were designed from the sequence of ctxA gene of V. cholerae K02679, submitted to GenBank by Lockman et al., 1984 [20].

Figure 2

Locations of the target sequences used as primers. The name and location of each target sequence as a primer in ctxA gene of V. cholerae K02679.

Locations of the target sequences used as primers. The name and location of each target sequence as a primer in ctxA gene of V. cholerae K02679. LAMP primers used All primers were designed from the sequence of ctxA gene of V. cholerae K02679, submitted to GenBank by Lockman et al., 1984 [20].

Determinations of sensitivities of the LAMP assay with pure cultures and spiked human feces

The sensitivities of the LAMP assay for the detection of CT-producing Vibrio cholerae with pure culture and spiked human feces were determined as previously described [11] with slight modification using known amounts of Vibrio cholerae O1 strain 13H173 (Table 1). A single culture on TCBS agar was inoculated in alkaline peptone water (APW; Eiken chemical) and incubated at 35°C for 6 h. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the culture were prepared in PB (Phosphate buffer). For preparation of DNAs from pure cultures, 100 μl of each was transferred to a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube, and was centrifuged for 5 min at 20,000 g. After removal of the supernatant, the pellets were resuspended in 50 μl of NaOH (25 mmol l-1), and the mixture was heated at 95°C, for 5 min. After neutralization with 4 μl of Tris-HCl buffer (1 mol l-1, pH 7.5), debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 g, 4°C, for 5 min. For preparation of DNAs from spiked human feces, 100 μl of each was spiked into 100 mg of a V. cholerae-negative human feces. The fecal sample was obtained from a Norovirus-positive patient with diarrhoea. The fecal sample was determined to be negative for V. cholerae according to the results of a microbiological examination with overnight APW enrichments and subsequent plating onto TCBS agar. The fecal homogenates were then adjusted to a 10% concentration with PB. After mixing well, the homogenate was centrifuged at 900 g for 1 min to remove larger fecal debris. Supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube, and was centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 g. After removal of the supernatant, the pellets were resuspended in 100 μl of NaOH (25 mmol l-1), and the mixture was heated at 95°C, for 5 min. After neutralization with 8 μl of Tris-HCl buffer (1 mol l-1, pH 7.5), debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 g, 4°C, for 5 min. Two microliters of each supernatant was then used as template DNA for LAMP assay. The sensitivity tests of the LAMP assay were conducted in triplicate, and the detection limits were defined as the last positive dilutions, with the sample considered positive if all three samples tested positive. In parallel, to enumerate the bacteria, 100-μl aliquots of appropriate dilutions were spread on Heart Infusion agar (Becton Dickinson) and incubated overnight at 35°C. Colonies were counted at the dilution yielding 30 to 300 Colony Forming Units (CFUs), and CFU per ml/g of suspension was calculated.

PCR assay

A multiplex PCR assay targeting ctxA, O1-rfb and O139-rfb genes [5] was performed in a 50-μl reaction mixture containing 2 μl of template DNA and the respective primer (Hokkaido System Science Co., Ltd.) in 1 × Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The sequences of primers were as described in published papers [5]. The concentrations of all primers were adjusted 0.2 μM. DNA amplification was performed in a TaKaRa PCR Thermal Cycler Dice Gradient (TaKaRa Bio, Otsu, Japan). The cycling conditions used were one cycle of 95°C for 15 min, 35 cycles each of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1.5 min and 72°C for 1 min, and ending with a final extension time at 72°C for 7 min. Samples were held at 4°C prior to analysis. PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels. After staining with ethidium bromide, the PCR products were detected under UV light. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was determined using template DNA from pure cultures and spiked cells in human feces as described above. The sensitivity tests of the PCR assays were conducted in triplicate, and the detection limits were defined as the last positive dilutions, with the sample considered positive if all three samples tested positive.

Authors' contributions

WY carried out LAMP and PCR assays; KS and MT isolated and identified bacterial strains together; WY and MI conceived the study; KI coordinated the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  17 in total

1.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA.

Authors:  T Notomi; H Okayama; H Masubuchi; T Yonekawa; K Watanabe; N Amino; T Hase
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers.

Authors:  K Nagamine; T Hase; T Notomi
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Development of a combined filtration-enrichment culture followed by a one-step duplex PCR technique for the rapid detection of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in human faecal samples.

Authors:  N Misawa; K Kawashima; H Kawamoto; F Kondo
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Soft-agar-coated filter method for early detection of viable and thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH)- or TDH-related hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood.

Authors:  Sachiko Hayashi; Masatoshi Okura; Ro Osawa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Salmonella.

Authors:  Yukiko Hara-Kudo; Manabu Yoshino; Tadashi Kojima; Masanari Ikedo
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples.

Authors:  Tomotada Iwamoto; Toshiaki Sonobe; Kozaburo Hayashi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of a combination of brushing technique and the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method as a novel, rapid, and safe system for detection of Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Masaaki Minami; Michio Ohta; Teruko Ohkura; Takafumi Ando; Keizo Torii; Tadao Hasegawa; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid and simple detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Wataru Yamazaki; Masumi Taguchi; Masanori Ishibashi; Miyoshi Kitazato; Masafumi Nukina; Naoaki Misawa; Kiyoshi Inoue
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin genes: nucleotide sequence analysis of DNA encoding ADP-ribosyltransferase.

Authors:  H A Lockman; J E Galen; J B Kaper
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Polymerase chain reaction for detection of the cholera enterotoxin operon of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  H Shirai; M Nishibuchi; T Ramamurthy; S K Bhattacharya; S C Pal; Y Takeda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  14 in total

1.  Utilization of Small RNA Genes to Distinguish Vibrio cholerae Biotypes via Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Siti Aminah Ahmed; Carsten A Raabe; Hong Leong Cheah; Chee Hock Hoe; Timofey S Rozhdestvensky; Thean Hock Tang
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Development of a reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus as a novel molecular method for diagnosis of pandemic influenza in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Toru Kubo; Masanobu Agoh; Le Q Mai; Kiyoyasu Fukushima; Hidekazu Nishimura; Akinori Yamaguchi; Manabu Hirano; Akira Yoshikawa; Futoshi Hasebe; Shigeru Kohno; Kouichi Morita
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of DOT-ELISA and Standard-ELISA for Detection of the Vibrio cholerae Toxin in Culture Supernatants of Bacteria Isolated from Human and Environmental Samples.

Authors:  Antonio Meza-Lucas; María-Fernanda Pérez-Villagómez; José-Patricio Martínez-López; Ricardo García-Rodea; María-Guadalupe Martínez-Castelán; Alejandro Escobar-Gutiérrez; Jorge-Luis de-la-Rosa-Arana; Altagracia Villanueva-Zamudio
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for sensitive and rapid detection of the tdh and trh genes of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related Vibrio species.

Authors:  Wataru Yamazaki; Yuko Kumeda; Naoaki Misawa; Yoshitsugu Nakaguchi; Mitsuaki Nishibuchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Development of a toxR-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Siyi Chen; Beilei Ge
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay and conventional culture methods for detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in naturally contaminated chicken meat samples.

Authors:  Wataru Yamazaki; Masumi Taguchi; Takao Kawai; Kentaro Kawatsu; Junko Sakata; Kiyoshi Inoue; Naoaki Misawa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the rapid detection of porcine cytomegalovirus under field conditions.

Authors:  Jin-Long Yang; Su-Hui Zhang; Zuo-Hua Liu; Rui Yang; Yong Huang; Ming Wen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  A simple and rapid method for detection of Goose Parvovirus in the field by loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Authors:  JinLong Yang; Rui Yang; AnChun Cheng; MingShu Wang; LiZhi Fu; SongQuan Yang; SuHui Zhang; Liu Yang; ZhiYong Xu
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for sensitive and rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Wataru Yamazaki; Masanori Ishibashi; Ryuji Kawahara; Kiyoshi Inoue
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Development of an immunochromatographic test strip for detection of cholera toxin.

Authors:  Eiki Yamasaki; Ryuta Sakamoto; Takashi Matsumoto; Fumiki Morimatsu; Takayuki Kurazono; Toyoko Hiroi; G Balakrish Nair; Hisao Kurazono
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.