Literature DB >> 19045803

Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.

Melanie L Matthies1, Frank H Guenther, Margaret Denny, Joseph S Perkell, Ellen Burton, Jennell Vick, Harlan Lane, Mark Tiede, Majid Zandipour.   

Abstract

Tongue shape can vary greatly for allophones of /r/ produced in different phonetic contexts but the primary acoustic cue used by listeners, lowered F3, remains stable. For the current study, it was hypothesized that auditory feedback maintains the speech motor control mechanisms that are constraining acoustic variability of F3 in /r/; thus the listener's percept remains /r/ despite the range of articulatory configurations employed by the speaker. Given the potential importance of auditory feedback, postlingually deafened speakers should show larger acoustic variation in /r/ allophones than hearing controls, and auditory feedback from a cochlear implant could reduce that variation over time. To test these hypotheses, measures were made of phoneme perception and of production of tokens containing /r/, stop consonants, and /r/+stop clusters in hearing controls and in eight postlingually deafened adults pre- and postimplant. Postimplant, seven of the eight implant speakers did not differ from the control mean. It was also found that implant users' production of stop and stop+/r/ blend improved with time but the measured acoustic contrast between these was still better in the control speakers than for the implant group even after the implant users had experienced a year of improved auditory feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045803      PMCID: PMC2677359          DOI: 10.1121/1.2987427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  L Kishon-Rabin; R Taitelbaum; Y Tobin; M Hildesheimer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production.

Authors:  F H Guenther; C Y Espy-Wilson; S E Boyce; M L Matthies; M Zandipour; J S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The distinctness of speakers' productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell; Frank H Guenther; Harlan Lane; Melanie L Matthies; Ellen Stockmann; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production.

Authors:  Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell; Hugh D Curtin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production.

Authors:  Frank H Guenther; Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts.

Authors:  Harlan Lane; Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Stockmann; Mark Tiede; Jennell Vick; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners.

Authors:  J C Ingram; S G Park
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/.

Authors:  S Boyce; C Y Espy-Wilson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The use of ultrasound in remediation of North American English /r/ in 2 adolescents.

Authors:  Marcy Adler-Bock; Barbara May Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/.

Authors:  Xinhui Zhou; Carol Y Espy-Wilson; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Christy Holland; Ann Choe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  3 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  An investigation of the relation between sibilant production and somatosensory and auditory acuity.

Authors:  Satrajit S Ghosh; Melanie L Matthies; Edwin Maas; Alexandra Hanson; Mark Tiede; Lucie Ménard; Frank H Guenther; Harlan Lane; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Mark Tiede
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.