Literature DB >> 9035399

Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics.

A Alwan1, S Narayanan, K Haker.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance images of the vocal tract during sustained production of [symbol: see text] by four native American English talkers are employed for measuring vocal-tract dimensions and for morphological analysis of the 3D vocal tract and tongue shapes. Electropalatography contact profiles are used for studying inter- and intra-talker variabilities. The vocal tract during the production of [symbol: see text] appears to be characterized by three cavities due to the presence of two supraglottal constrictions: the primary one in the oral cavity, and a secondary one in the pharyngeal cavity. All subjects show a large volume anterior to the oral constriction, which results from an inward-drawn tongue body, an anterior tongue body that is characterized by convex cross sections, and a concave posterior tongue body shape. Inter-subject variabilities are observed in the oral-constriction location and the way the constriction is formed. No systematic differences are found between the 3-D vocal tract and tongue shapes of word-initial and syllabic [symbol: see text]s. Tongue-shaping mechanisms for these sounds and their acoustic implications are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9035399     DOI: 10.1121/1.417972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children.

Authors:  Richard S McGowan; Susan Nittrouer; Carol J Manning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of body position on vocal tract acoustics: Acoustic pharyngometry and vowel formants.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Sara L Kurtzweil; Marios Fourakis; Ray D Kent; Katelyn K Tillman; Diane Austin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-based vocal tract area functions obtained from the same speaker in 1994 and 2002.

Authors:  Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Variability in individual constriction contributions to third formant values in American English /ɹ/.

Authors:  Sarah Harper; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Using electromagnetic articulography with a tongue lateral sensor to discriminate manner of articulation.

Authors:  William F Katz; Sonya Mehta; Matthew Wood; Jun Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An age-dependent vocal tract model for males and females based on anatomic measurements.

Authors:  Brad H Story; Houri K Vorperian; Kate Bunton; Reid B Durtschi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie S Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.