Literature DB >> 21682421

Predicted effects of sensorineural hearing loss on across-fiber envelope coding in the auditory nerve.

Jayaganesh Swaminathan1, Michael G Heinz.   

Abstract

Cross-channel envelope correlations are hypothesized to influence speech intelligibility, particularly in adverse conditions. Acoustic analyses suggest speech envelope correlations differ for syllabic and phonemic ranges of modulation frequency. The influence of cochlear filtering was examined here by predicting cross-channel envelope correlations in different speech modulation ranges for normal and impaired auditory-nerve (AN) responses. Neural cross-correlation coefficients quantified across-fiber envelope coding in syllabic (0-5 Hz), phonemic (5-64 Hz), and periodicity (64-300 Hz) modulation ranges. Spike trains were generated from a physiologically based AN model. Correlations were also computed using the model with selective hair-cell damage. Neural predictions revealed that envelope cross-correlation decreased with increased characteristic-frequency separation for all modulation ranges (with greater syllabic-envelope correlation than phonemic or periodicity). Syllabic envelope was highly correlated across many spectral channels, whereas phonemic and periodicity envelopes were correlated mainly between adjacent channels. Outer-hair-cell impairment increased the degree of cross-channel correlation for phonemic and periodicity ranges for speech in quiet and in noise, thereby reducing the number of independent neural information channels for envelope coding. In contrast, outer-hair-cell impairment was predicted to decrease cross-channel correlation for syllabic envelopes in noise, which may partially account for the reduced ability of hearing-impaired listeners to segregate speech in complex backgrounds.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682421      PMCID: PMC3135152          DOI: 10.1121/1.3583502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative importance of temporal information in various frequency regions for consonant identification in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold.

Authors:  E D Young; P E Barta
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial cross-correlation. A proposed mechanism for acoustic pitch perception.

Authors:  G E Loeb; M W White; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. IV. Stereocilia damage and alterations in rate- and phase-level functions.

Authors:  M C Liberman; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Furosemide selectively reduces one component in rate-level functions from auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  W F Sewell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality.

Authors:  H J Steeneken; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  7 in total

1.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

3.  Dual Coding of Frequency Modulation in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Nihaad Paraouty; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Ian M Winter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Speech Categorization Reveals the Role of Early-Stage Temporal-Coherence Processing in Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

7.  Vowel perception in listeners with normal hearing and in listeners with hearing loss: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mark Hedrick; Lauren Charles; Nicole Drakopoulos Street
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.