Literature DB >> 18345854

Selectivity of modulation interference for consonant identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Frédéric Apoux1, Sid P Bacon.   

Abstract

The present study sought to establish whether speech recognition can be disrupted by the presence of amplitude modulation (AM) at a remote spectral region, and whether that disruption depends upon the rate of AM. The goal was to determine whether this paradigm could be used to examine which modulation frequencies in the speech envelope are most important for speech recognition. Consonant identification for a band of speech located in either the low- or high-frequency region was measured in the presence of a band of noise located in the opposite frequency region. The noise was either unmodulated or amplitude modulated by a sinusoid, a band of noise with a fixed absolute bandwidth, or a band of noise with a fixed relative bandwidth. The frequency of the modulator was 4, 16, 32, or 64 Hz. Small amounts of modulation interference were observed for all modulator types, irrespective of the location of the speech band. More important, the interference depended on modulation frequency, clearly supporting the existence of selectivity of modulation interference with speech stimuli. Overall, the results suggest a primary role of envelope fluctuations around 4 and 16 Hz without excluding the possibility of a contribution by faster rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345854     DOI: 10.1121/1.2828067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Differential contribution of envelope fluctuations across frequency to consonant identification in quiet.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Speech Categorization Reveals the Role of Early-Stage Temporal-Coherence Processing in Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.

Authors:  Sara M K Madsen; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.