Literature DB >> 18523831

Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability.

Keith R Berend1, Adolph V Lombardi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Severe distal femoral bone loss and instability in revision TKA is challenging. We retrospectively reviewed 39 rotating-hinged distal femoral replacement devices in 37 patients to examine whether improved results were obtainable, using one design, over previously published results. The average age of the patients was 76 years (standard deviation, 10 years). Indications for distal femoral replacement included 11 revision TKAs, 13 periprosthetic fractures, 11 reimplantations, two complex primary TKAs, one distal femoral nonunion, and one acute distal femur fracture. Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 46 months; range, 24-109 months). Eight patients died during followup. There were five reoperations: two patients with recurrent infection after two-stage treatment, one patient with a periprosthetic fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation, one patient with late hematogenous infection, and one patient with bearing exchange to treat hyperextension. No failures from aseptic loosening were seen. Knee Society scores improved from 39 preoperatively to 87, and pain scores improved from 18 preoperatively to 43. Distal femoral prosthetic replacement with a tumor-type implant in severe cases provides excellent pain relief and function with a low short-term reoperation rate and an implant survivorship rate of 87% at 46 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523831      PMCID: PMC2628491          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0329-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Early catastrophic failure of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  C J Wang; H E Wang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Petrou; H Petrou; C Tilkeridis; T Stavrakis; T Kapetsis; N Kremmidas; M Gavras
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

4.  Dislocation of rotating-hinge knee prostheses with antidislocation mechanism.

Authors:  Daniel Pacha-Vicente; Amer Malik; Enric Castellet-Feliu; Joan Nardi-Vilardaga
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B D Springer; A D Hanssen; F H Sim; D G Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Evaluation of the Noiles hinged knee prosthesis. A five-year study of seventeen knees.

Authors:  R Shindell; R Neumann; J F Connolly; O M Jardon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Hinge total knee replacement revisited.

Authors:  H U Cameron; C Hu; D Vyamont
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severly affected knees.

Authors:  G H Westrich; A V Mollano; T P Sculco; R L Buly; R S Laskin; R Windsor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The SMILES prosthesis in salvage revision knee surgery.

Authors:  D L Back; L David; A Hilton; G Blunn; T W R Briggs; S R Cannon
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Distal femoral allograft reconstruction for massive osteolytic bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hari P Bezwada; Anjan R Shah; Kimberly Zambito; Douglas L Cerynik; Norman A Johanson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  35 in total

1.  Distal femur and proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis in revision knee arthroplasty: a limb-saving procedure.

Authors:  Steffen Höll; Annabel Schlomberg; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Arne Streitbuerger; Dino Schulz; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: indication, technique, results and review of literature.

Authors:  Reinhard Windhager; Markus Schreiner; Kevin Staats; Sebastian Apprich
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Tumor prostheses : Important in modern revision arthroplasty].

Authors:  A Hillmann; I Ipach
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Revision knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral replacement prosthesis for periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Ehab Girgis; Christoph McAllen; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  Periprosthetic fractures around the knee: current concepts and advances in management.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Sanchit Mehendale
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

7.  Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Quinzi; Gabriel Ramirez; Nathan B Kaplan; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Hinged total knee arthroplasty in the presence of ligamentous deficiency.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Manuel A Sandoval-García
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Length of Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Complications and Reoperations.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Barry; Zachary Thielen; David C Sing; Paul H Yi; Erik N Hansen; Michael Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.