Literature DB >> 22733440

Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Claus L Jensen1, Michael M Petersen, Henrik M Schrøder, Bjarne Lund.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Forty patients were enrolled in a prospective randomised study using conventional method or "Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer inc., Warsaw, USA) for reconstruction of bone loss of the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The aim was to evaluate changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the proximal tibia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients [median 67 years (range: 40-85 years)] received rTKA with NexGen® (Zimmer Warsaw, USA) revision system. Knee Society´s Knee Scoring System and the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone classification was used. Changes in BMD were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
RESULTS: Knee and function score improved in both groups. No significant changes between the groups were found. Changes in BMD within the two groups were quite similar. Overall decreases in BMD of 0.1 - 5.4 % were found in both groups (ROI 1-6) postoperative to 12 months of follow-up, except that ROI 7 showed an increase in BMD (0.8 - 1.3 %). After 24 months of follow-up, an increase in BMD was found along the stem (ROI 2-5) of 1.9 - 6.3 % , with significant changes in the TM Cone Group (ROI 3, 4, 5) . No significant changes in BMD between the groups were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The bone remodelling pattern was almost the same in the two groups after two years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733440      PMCID: PMC3427456          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1601-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Benjamin; G Engh; B Parsley; T Donaldson; T Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Biological performance of tantalum.

Authors:  J Black
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1994

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1988

5.  The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997.

Authors:  O Robertsson; K Knutson; S Lewold; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-10

6.  Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur following uncemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M M Petersen; C Olsen; J B Lauritzen; B Lund
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 25 knees.

Authors:  M M Petersen; P T Nielsen; J B Lauritzen; B Lund
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-12

8.  Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M G Li; K G Nilsson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Osteopenia after osteotomy of the tibia.

Authors:  V Finsen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  7 in total

1.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

2.  Two-stage treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty: two to thirteen year experience using an articulating preformed spacer.

Authors:  Claudio Carlo Castelli; Valerio Gotti; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Additive manufacturing of porous titanium metaphyseal components: Early osseointegration and implant stability in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas England; Joseph Pagkalos; Lee Jeys; Rajesh Botchu; Richard Carey Smith
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-24

4.  Midterm Outcomes of Tantalum Metal Cones for Severe Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ashok Rajgopal; Sumit Kumar; Kalpana Aggarwal
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-11

5.  Does the use of 3D-printed cones give a chance to postpone the use of megaprostheses in patients with large bone defects in the knee joint?

Authors:  Daniel Kotrych; Sławomir Marcinkowski; Adam Brodecki; Marcin Anuszkiewicz; Jakub Kleszowski; Andrzej Bohatyrewicz; Dawid Ciechanowicz
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-07-15

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of tibial bone adaptation after revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of different implant systems.

Authors:  María Paz Quilez; Belen Seral; María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Review on Bone Mineral Density Loss in Total Knee Replacements Leading to Increased Fracture Risk.

Authors:  M Gundry; S Hopkins; K Knapp
Journal:  Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.