Literature DB >> 15732004

[Current aspects of stone therapy].

T Knoll1, G Wendt-Nordahl, L Trojan, A Wenke, N Roeder, P Alken.   

Abstract

More than 30 % of all admissions to an urologic clinic are for the treatment of urinary stones. In almost all cases, the treatment is minimally invasive employing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Technical advances in endourology and a growing expertise in ESWL led to a decline in ESWL and an increase in endoscopic techniques. In comparison with ESWL, the endoscopic techniques are more invasive but in most cases achieve a stone free state faster. With the introduction of diagnosis related groups (DRG), the economic aspect of stone therapy is gaining in importance. Stone prevention leads to a cost reduction in the health care system, justifying the use of an appropriate stone metaphylaxis. This review article presents the current recommendations for interventional urinary stone therapy and lists the options of conducting both medical and economically rational therapy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15732004     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-830192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aktuelle Urol        ISSN: 0001-7868            Impact factor:   0.658


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Recurrence prevention of urolithiasis with respect to economic aspects].

Authors:  R Siener; N Laube; W L Strohmaier
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Urolithiasis in children--rational diagnosis, therapy, and metaphylaxis].

Authors:  D Fahlenkamp; B Noack; S Lebentrau; H Belz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Use of a gelatine-thrombin matrix for closure of the access tract without a nephrostomy tube in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy].

Authors:  D Schilling; B Winter; A S Merseburger; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; A Stenzl; U Nagele
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Noor Buchholz; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.