Literature DB >> 20211607

Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.

Donna Coch1, Priya Mitra.   

Abstract

A variant of the Reicher-Wheeler task was used to determine when in the event-related potential (ERP) waveform indices of word and pseudoword superiority effects might be present, and whether ERP measures of superiority effects correlated with standardized behavioral measures of orthographic fluency and single word reading. ERPs were recorded to briefly presented, masked letter strings that included real words (DARK/PARK), pseudowords (DARL/PARL), nonwords (RDKA/RPKA), and letter-in-xs (DXXX, PXXX) stimuli. Participants decided which of two letters occurred at a given position in the string (here, forced-choice alternatives D and P). Behaviorally, both word (more accurate choices for letters in words than in baseline nonwords or letter-in-xs) and pseudoword (more accurate choices for letters in pseudowords than in baseline conditions) superiority effects were observed. Electrophysiologically, effects of orthographic regularity and familiarity were apparent as early as the P150 time window (100-160ms), an effect of lexicality was observed as early as the N200 time window (160-200ms), and peak amplitude of the N300 and N400 also differentiated word and pseudoword as compared to baseline stimuli. Further, the size of the P150 and N400 ERP word superiority effects was related to standardized behavioral measures of fluency and reading. Results suggest that orthographic fluency is reflected in both lower-level, sublexical, perceptual processing and higher-level, lexical processing in fluently reading adults. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211607      PMCID: PMC2857552          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  71 in total

1.  ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution.

Authors:  S Bentin; Y Mouchetant-Rostaing; M H Giard; J F Echallier; J Pernier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

3.  Automatic word form processing in masked priming: an ERP study.

Authors:  Giordana Grossi; Donna Coch
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Activation of the posterior cingulate by semantic priming: a co-registered ERP/fMRI study.

Authors:  Aminda J O'Hare; Joseph Dien; Lauren D Waterson; Cary R Savage
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Margaret Gillon-Dowens; Marta Vergara; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming.

Authors:  M C Doyle; M D Rugg; T Wells
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A developmental, interactive activation model of the word superiority effect.

Authors:  C H Chase; P Tallal
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1990-06

8.  The word without the tachistoscope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; B Silvers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

9.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe.

Authors:  A C Nobre; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of word and pseudoword superiority effects in 7- and 11-year-olds.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Priya Mitra; Elyse George
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  N1 and P2 to words and wordlike stimuli in late elementary school children and adults.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Gabriela Meade
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Early Effect of Phonological Information in Korean Visual Word Recognition: An ERP Investigation with Transposed Letters.

Authors:  Youan Kwon; Changhwan Lee; Jini Tae; Yoonhyoung Lee
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-08

4.  Spatiotemporal properties of the neural representation of conceptual content for words and pictures - an MEG study.

Authors:  Giuliano Giari; Elisa Leonardelli; Yuan Tao; Mayara Machado; Scott L Fairhall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Masked repetition priming of letter-in-string identification: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Massol; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  When less is more: feedback, priming, and the pseudoword superiority effect.

Authors:  Stéphanie Massol; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Can reading-specific training stimuli improve the effect of perceptual learning on peripheral reading speed?

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Amit Arunkumar; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  N400 Event-Related Potential and Standardized Measures of Reading in Late Elementary School Children: Correlated or Independent?

Authors:  Donna Coch; Clarisse Benoit
Journal:  Mind Brain Educ       Date:  2015-09

9.  Language context modulates reading route: an electrical neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Karin A Buetler; Diego de León Rodríguez; Marina Laganaro; René Müri; Lucas Spierer; Jean-Marie Annoni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Neural activity tied to reading predicts individual differences in extended-text comprehension.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Marcia Grabowecky; Ken A Paller; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.