Literature DB >> 27372835

Consonantal overlap effects in a perceptual matching task.

Stéphanie Massol1, Manuel Carreiras2,3,4, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia2.   

Abstract

This study investigates the processing of letter position coding by exploring whether or not two explicitly presented words that share the same consonants, but that differ in their vowels, exert mutual interference more than two words that do not share their consonants. In an explicit perceptual matching task, word targets were preceded by a word reference that could share all the consonants either at the same position or in a different absolute position (while keeping their relative position intact) or preceded by an unrelated reference. Experiment 1 showed larger discrimination costs for pairs sharing the consonants at the same position than for pairs sharing their consonants in a different position. Experiment 2 investigated when and how the types of overlap influence word target processing by using event-related potential recordings. The ERP results showed a Relatedness effect only for targets that share the consonants at the same position from 120 to 600 ms post-target onset, whereas targets that share their consonants in different positions in the string produced null effects. Altogether, these data suggest that targets containing the same consonants included in the references in the same positions are processed as being highly similar to them, thus distorting target processing. Furthermore, these data suggest possible mechanisms of competition between lexical representations of the reference and target stimuli.

Keywords:  Absolute position; Consonantal overlap; Relative position; Visual word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27372835     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4713-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  Predictive value of novel stimuli modifies visual event-related potentials and behavior.

Authors:  S Suwazono; L Machado; R T Knight
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Are transposition effects specific to letters?

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; Manuel Perea; Samara Muñoz
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Lionel Naccache; Jérôme Sackur; Claire Sergent
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

5.  The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Kristi Kiyonaga; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

6.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Margaret Gillon-Dowens; Marta Vergara; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Masked priming from orthographic neighbors: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Massol; Jonathan Grainger; Stéphane Dufau; Phillip Holcomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Order information in multiple-element comparison.

Authors:  J S Angiolillo-Bent; L J Rips
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A dual-route approach to orthographic processing.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.