Literature DB >> 22766964

Does the advantage of the upper part of words occur at the lexical level?

Manuel Perea1, Montserrat Comesaña, Ana P Soares.   

Abstract

Several recent studies have shown that the upper part of words is more important than the lower part in visual word recognition. Here, we examine whether or not this advantage arises at the lexical or at the letter (letter feature) level. To examine this issue, we conducted two lexical decision experiments in which words/pseudowords were preceded by a very brief (50-ms) presentation of their upper or lower parts (e.g., ). If the advantage for the upper part of words arises at the letter (letter feature) level, the effect should occur for both words and pseudowords. Results revealed an advantage for the upper part of words, but not for pseudowords. This suggests that the advantage for the upper part of words occurs at the lexical level, rather than at the letter (or letter feature) level.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766964     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0219-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: evidence from the fast priming paradigm.

Authors:  Hye-Won Lee; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

3.  On the role of the upper part of words in lexical access: evidence with masked priming.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Montserrat Comesaña; Ana P Soares; Carmen Moret-Tatay
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: a test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Isabel Fraga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

6.  The spatio-temporal dynamics of visual letter recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Fiset; Caroline Blais; Martin Arguin; Karine Tadros; Catherine Ethier-Majcher; Daniel Bub; Frederic Gosselin
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Margaret Gillon-Dowens; Marta Vergara; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

Authors:  J Grainger; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; R W Noel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Revisiting Huey: on the importance of the upper part of words during reading.

Authors:  Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

2.  Is there a genuine advantage to the upper part of words during lexical access? Evidence from the Stroop task.

Authors:  Pilar Tejero; Manuel Perea; María Jiménez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.