Literature DB >> 18491100

Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and MRI: initial clinical experience.

Gorka Bastarrika1, Maria Arraiza, Carlo N De Cecco, Stefano Mastrobuoni, Matias Ubilla, Gregorio Rábago.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare LV function and mass quantification derived from cardiac dual-source CT (DSCT) exams with those obtained by MRI in heart transplant recipients. Twelve heart transplant recipients who underwent cardiac DSCT and MRI examination were included. Double-oblique short-axis 8-mm slice thickness images were evaluated. Left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, cardiac output and myocardial mass were manually assessed for each patient by two blinded readers. A systematic overestimation of all left ventricular volumes by DSCT when compared with MRI was observed. Mean difference was 16.58 +/- 18.61 ml for EDV, 4.9 4 +/- 6.84 ml for ESV, 11.64 +/- 13.58 ml for SV and 5.73 +/- 1.14 l/min for CO. Slightly lower values for left ventricular ejection fraction with DSCT compared with MRI were observed (mean difference 0.34 +/- 3.18%, p = 0.754). Correlation between DSCT and MRI for left ventricular mass was excellent (rho = 0.972). Bland and Altman plots and CCC indicated good agreement between DSCT and MRI left ventricular function and mass measurements. The interobserver correlation was good. In conclusion, DSCT accurately estimates left ventricular ejection fraction, volumes and mass in heart transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491100     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0949-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  36 in total

1.  Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed.

Authors:  Bernd J Wintersperger; Konstantin Nikolaou; Franz von Ziegler; Thorsten Johnson; Carsten Rist; Alexander Leber; Thomas Flohr; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Matthias Grude; Kai Uwe Juergens; Thomas Wichter; Matthias Paul; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Joachim Georg Muller; Walter Heindel; Guenter Breithardt; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature.

Authors:  P A van der Vleuten; T P Willems; M J W Götte; R A Tio; M J W Greuter; F Zijlstra; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.

Authors:  S Busch; T R C Johnson; B J Wintersperger; N Minaifar; A Bhargava; C Rist; M F Reiser; C Becker; K Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Ralf Koos; Marcus Katoh; Elmar Spuentrup; Petra Busch; Joachim E Wildberger; Harald P Kühl; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity.

Authors:  Shunsuke Natori; Shenghan Lai; J Paul Finn; Antoinette S Gomes; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Gregory Pearson; Shantanu Sinha; Andrew Arai; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T Schlosser; O K Mohrs; A Magedanz; T Voigtländer; A Schmermund; J Barkhausen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Sandstede; C Lipke; M Beer; S Hofmann; T Pabst; W Kenn; S Neubauer; D Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  8 in total

1.  Left ventricular mass from gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison with cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Tochi M Okwuosa; Chetan V Hampole; Javid Ali; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Performance of Automated Software in the Assessment of Segmental Left Ventricular Function in Cardiac CT: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Christian Canstein; James V Spearman; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Incremental diagnostic value of regional left ventricular function over coronary assessment by cardiac computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain: from the ROMICAT trial.

Authors:  Sujith K Seneviratne; Quynh A Truong; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Michael D Shapiro; Christopher L Schlett; Claudia U Chae; Ricardo Cury; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Effects of propranolol on the left ventricular volume of normal subjects during CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yuan Heng Mo; Fu Shan Jaw; Yung Cheng Wang; Chin Ming Jeng; Shinn Forng Peng
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Assessment of myocardial fibrosis and coronary arteries in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using combined arterial and delayed enhanced CT: comparison with MR and coronary angiography.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Xiaohai Ma; Mark C Delano; Tengyong Jiang; Chen Zhang; Yi Liu; Zhaoqi Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The reliability of automatic measurement of left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography datasets.

Authors:  G J de Jonge; P M A van Ooijen; P A van der Vleuten; D D Lubbers; J H Kasemier; G H de Bock; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison of MRI, 64-slice MDCT and DSCT in assessing functional cardiac parameters of a moving heart phantom.

Authors:  J M Groen; P A van der Vleuten; M J W Greuter; F Zijlstra; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Dual-source computed tomography for evaluating coronary stenosis and left ventricular function.

Authors:  Chunfeng Hu; Jie Wang; Kai Xu; Yingying Yuan; Xiuling Wang; Lixiang Xie; Shaodong Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.