Literature DB >> 15682266

Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.

Andreas H Mahnken1, Ralf Koos, Marcus Katoh, Elmar Spuentrup, Petra Busch, Joachim E Wildberger, Harald P Kühl, Rolf W Günther.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess global left ventricular (LV) function and regional wall motion using retrospectively ECG-gated 16-slice computed tomography (CT) in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-one patients (18 male, 65.5+/-8.6 years) with acute myocardial infarction underwent multislice spiral CT (MSCT) and MRI. From manually drawn endo- and epicardial contours, LV volumes including myocardial mass, peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejection rate (PER), time to PER (TPER) and time from end-systole to PFR (TPFR) were calculated. Regional wall motion was assessed from cine loops using a 16-segment model of the left ventricle. LV function was analyzed using the Bland-Altman method, Pearson's correlation coefficient, multivariate analysis and post hoc t tests. Regional wall motion was evaluated with weighted kappa-statistics. Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences for global LV function as determined by MSCT and MRI. Post hoc t-tests showed significant differences for end-diastolic volume (EDV), PFR and TPER (P<0.05), while there was a good agreement for the LV volumes with an ejection fraction of 46.9+/-8.4% for MSCT and 46.9+/-8.9% for MRI. PER, PFR, TPER and TPFR presented a poor correlation and a wide range of scattering between MSCT and MRI. Regional wall motion scores showed a good agreement with kappa=0.791. Sixteen-slice spiral CT allows for reliable assessment of LV volumes, but is not yet suited for the evaluation of all functional parameters. Assessment of regional wall motion at rest is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15682266     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2592-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular function.

Authors:  S B Greenberg; S K Sandhu
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Martijn S Dirksen; Jeroen J Bax; Albert de Roos; J Wouter Jukema; Rob J van der Geest; Koos Geleijns; Eric Boersma; Ernst E van der Wall; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging.

Authors:  Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat; Wojciech Mazur; Kerry M Link; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Two-dimensional echocardiography and infarct size: relationship of regional wall motion and thickening to the extent of myocardial infarction in the dog.

Authors:  A N Lieberman; J L Weiss; B I Jugdutt; L C Becker; B H Bulkley; J G Garrison; G M Hutchins; C A Kallman; M L Weisfeldt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  MRI-derived ventricular volume curves for the assessment of left ventricular function.

Authors:  S J Soldo; S L Norris; J R Gober; L J Haywood; P M Colletti; M Terk
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT.

Authors:  T Boehm; H Alkadhi; M Roffi; J K Willmann; L M Desbiolles; B Marincek; S Wildermuth
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-04

8.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.

Authors:  Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; R M Norris; M A Brown; P W Brandt; R M Whitlock; C J Wild
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry.

Authors:  M Emond; M B Mock; K B Davis; L D Fisher; D R Holmes; B R Chaitman; G C Kaiser; E Alderman; T Killip
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Accuracy of automated attenuation-based 3-dimensional segmentation: in the analysis of left ventricular function compared with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Harald Brodoefel; Ilias Tsiflikas; Ulrich Kramer; Nina Lang; Anja Reimann; Christoph Burgstahler; Claus D Claussen; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

3.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Authors:  Martin Heuschmid; Julia K Rothfuss; Stephen Schroeder; Michael Fenchel; Norbert Stauder; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas Franow; Ronald S Kuzo; Axel Kuettner; Stephan Miller; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Left ventricular function studied with MDCT.

Authors:  Kai Uwe Juergens; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm.

Authors:  Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Christian Hohl; Joachim E Wildberger; Daniel Rinck; Thomas G Flohr; Ralf Koos; Christian Knackstedt; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Ralf Koos; Sven Stanzel; Petra Simone Busch; Mathias Niethammer; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Reliable 5-min real-time MR technique for left-ventricular-wall motion analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Katoh; Harald P Kühl; Elmar Spuentrup; Claudia S A Lipke; Rolf W Günther; Arno Buecker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Noninvasive modalities for the assessment of left ventricular function: all are equal but some are more equal than others.

Authors:  Tiong Keng Lim; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Assessment of regional left ventricular function with multidetector-row computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.