Literature DB >> 27461110

Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Ellie Aniulis1, Owen Churches2, Nicole A Thomas2, Michael E R Nicholls2.   

Abstract

When dividing attention between the left and right sides of physical space, most individuals pay slightly more attention to the left side. This phenomenon, known as pseudoneglect, may also occur for the left and right sides of mental representations of stimuli. Representational pseudoneglect has been shown for the recall of real-world scenes and for simple, briefly presented stimuli. The current study sought to investigate the effect of exposure duration and complexity using adaptations of the Rey-Osterrieth figures. Undergraduates (n = 97) were shown a stimulus for 20 s and asked to remember it. Participants were then shown a probe and indicated whether it was the same or different. Results showed that, irrespective of whether an element was added or subtracted, changes on the left side of the remembered image were better detected. These results are consistent with representational pseudoneglect and demonstrate that this effect occurs for complex stimuli when presented for an extended period of time. Representation neglect is therefore unlikely to be the result of an initial saccade to the left-but could be related to the formation or recall of the representation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetry; Attention; Imagery; Left; Neglect; Right

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27461110     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4735-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI.

Authors:  G R Fink; J C Marshall; N J Shah; P H Weiss; P W Halligan; M Grosse-Ruyken; K Ziemons; K Zilles; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Change detection in complex scenes: hemispheric contribution and the role of perceptual and semantic factors.

Authors:  Sara Spotorno; Sylvane Faure
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Visual processing asymmetries in change detection.

Authors:  Osman Iyilikci; Cordula Becker; Onur Güntürkün; Sonia Amado
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Unilateral neglect of representational space.

Authors:  E Bisiach; C Luzzatti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  A lateralized bias in mental imagery: evidence for representational pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Peter McGeorge; Nicoletta Beschin; Alessandra Colnaghi; Maria Luisa Rusconi; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network.

Authors:  Tali Siman-Tov; Avi Mendelsohn; Tom Schonberg; Galia Avidan; Ilana Podlipsky; Luiz Pessoa; Natan Gadoth; Leslie G Ungerleider; Talma Hendler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ellen Matthias
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Andrea M Loftus; Wim Gevers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

Authors:  M E Nicholls; J L Bradshaw; J B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?

Authors:  J B Mattingley; J L Bradshaw; N C Nettleton; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Jagjot Kaur; Hana Abbas; Ming Wu; Wenyi Luo; Sinan Osman; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Visuospatial asymmetries do not modulate the cheerleader effect.

Authors:  Daniel J Carragher; Blake J Lawrence; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.