Literature DB >> 21562926

Interactions between perceptual and numerical space.

Peter Kramer1, Ivilin Stoianov, Carlo Umiltà, Marco Zorzi.   

Abstract

Interactions between numbers and space have become a major issue in numerical cognition. Neuropsychological studies suggest that the interactions occur, before response selection, at a spatially organized representation of numbers (the mental number line). Reaction time (RT) studies, on the other hand, usually point to associations between response codes that do not necessarily imply a number line. There is only one such study that has found a spationumerical interaction between perception and semantics (SNIPS) effect before response selection. Here, in Experiment 1, we isolated the SNIPS effect from other numerical effects and corroborated the prediction that it can be induced by both left and right spatial cues. In Experiment 2, we isolated the peak of the time course of the SNIPS effect and corroborated the prediction that it occurs when a cue follows a target, and not when both appear simultaneously. The results reconcile neuropsychological and RT studies and support the hypothesis that numbers are represented along a left-to-right spatially organized mental number line. [corrected]

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562926     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0104-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  35 in total

1.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Inge M Keus
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

2.  Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Alissandra M McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

3.  Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Dana Müller
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line.

Authors:  Ivilin Stoianov; Peter Kramer; Carlo Umiltà; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-06

6.  The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line.

Authors:  Seppe Santens; Wim Gevers
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-03-03

7.  Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Andrea M Loftus; Wim Gevers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

8.  A computational model of the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Zorzi; C Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

9.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Sensory and cognitive processes of shifts of spatial attention induced by numbers: an ERP study.

Authors:  Elena Salillas; Radouane El Yagoubi; Carlo Semenza
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  11 in total

1.  Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Ranzini; Matteo Lisi; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 2.  Number concepts: abstract and embodied.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic.

Authors:  Nicolas Masson; Mauro Pesenti; Valérie Dormal
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-24

4.  Optokinetic stimulation modulates neglect for the number space: evidence from mental number interval bisection.

Authors:  Konstantinos Priftis; Marco Pitteri; Francesca Meneghello; Carlo Umiltà; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Time estimation predicts mathematical intelligence.

Authors:  Peter Kramer; Paola Bressan; Massimo Grassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The heterogeneous nature of number-space interactions.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Wim Gevers; Christophe Lafosse; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Neglect impairs explicit processing of the mental number line.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Mario Bonato; Barbara Treccani; Giovanni Scalambrin; Roberto Marenzi; Konstantinos Priftis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Ocular drift along the mental number line.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

9.  Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.

Authors:  Yun Pan; Xiaohong Han; Gaoxing Mei; Xuejun Bai; Yan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can Implicit or Explicit Time Processing Impact Numerical Representation? Evidence From a Dual Task Paradigm.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Di Bono; Caterina Dapor; Simone Cutini; Konstantinos Priftis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.