Literature DB >> 18483600

The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications.

David W Newton1, Maria Boyle, Carmen A Catizone.   

Abstract

Since 2004, passing the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) has been a requirement for earning initial pharmacy licensure in all 50 United States. The creation and evolution from 1952-2005 of the particular pharmacy competency testing areas and quantities of questions are described for the former paper-and-pencil National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Licensure Examination (NABPLEX) and the current candidate-specific computer adaptive NAPLEX pharmacy licensure examinations. A 40% increase in the weighting of NAPLEX Blueprint Area 2 in May 2005, compared to that in the preceding 1997-2005 Blueprint, has implications for candidates' NAPLEX performance and associated curricular content and instruction. New pharmacy graduates' scores on the NAPLEX are neither intended nor validated to serve as a criterion for assessing or judging the quality or effectiveness of pharmacy curricula and instruction. The newest cycle of NAPLEX Blueprint revision, a continual process to ensure representation of nationwide contemporary practice, began in early 2008. It may take up to 2 years, including surveying several thousand national pharmacists, to complete.

Entities:  

Keywords:  North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX); competency; doctor of pharmacy curriculum; licensure examination

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18483600      PMCID: PMC2384208          DOI: 10.5688/aj720233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  2 in total

1.  Pharmacy is a science-based profession.

Authors:  Kenneth Skau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  PostScription: Compounding Paradox: Taught Less and Practiced More.

Authors:  David W Newton
Journal:  Int J Pharm Compd       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct
  2 in total
  15 in total

1.  Reliability and credibility of progress test criteria developed by alumni, faculty, and mixed alumni-faculty judge panels.

Authors:  H Glenn Anderson; Arthur A Nelson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Core competencies in natural health products for Canadian pharmacy students.

Authors:  Ani Byrne; Heather Boon; Zubin Austin; Tannis Jurgens; Lalitha Raman-Wilms
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Global education implications of the foreign pharmacy graduate equivalency examination.

Authors:  Fadi M Alkhateeb; Kevin A Clauson; David A Latif; Rabaa M Al-Rousan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  An electronic NAPLEX review program for longitudinal assessment of pharmacy students' knowledge.

Authors:  Monina R Lahoz; Paul Belliveau; Alice Gardner; Anna Morin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Educational testing validity and reliability in pharmacy and medical education literature.

Authors:  Matthew J Hoover; Rose Jung; David M Jacobs; Michael J Peeters
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Evaluation of Croatian community pharmacists' patient care competencies using the general level framework.

Authors:  Arijana Meštrović; Zivka Staničić; Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić; Iva Mucalo; Ian Bates; Catherine Duggan; Sarah Carter; Andreia Bruno
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Relationship between assessment item format and item performance characteristics.

Authors:  Stephen D Phipps; Marcia L Brackbill
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Time for consensus on a new approach for assessments.

Authors:  Therese I Poirier; Radhika Devraj
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Implementation of an integrated longitudinal curricular activity for graduating pharmacy students.

Authors:  Reza Karimi; Doug Meyer; Brad Fujisaki; Susan Stein
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Creating an Arms Race? Examining School Costs and Motivations for Providing NAPLEX and PCOA Preparation.

Authors:  Lisa Lebovitz; Veronica P Shuford; Margarita V DiVall; Kimberly K Daugherty; Michael J Rudolph
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.