Literature DB >> 29109557

Creating an Arms Race? Examining School Costs and Motivations for Providing NAPLEX and PCOA Preparation.

Lisa Lebovitz1, Veronica P Shuford2, Margarita V DiVall3, Kimberly K Daugherty4, Michael J Rudolph5.   

Abstract

Objective. To examine the extent of financial and faculty resources dedicated to preparing students for NAPLEX and PCOA examinations, and how these investments compare with NAPLEX pass rates. Methods. A 23-item survey was administered to assessment professionals in U.S. colleges and schools of pharmacy (C/SOPs). Institutions were compared by type, age, and student cohort size. Institutional differences were explored according to the costs and types of NAPLEX and PCOA preparation provided, if any, and mean NAPLEX pass rates. Results. Of 134 C/SOPs that received the survey invitation, 91 responded. Nearly 80% of these respondents reported providing some form of NAPLEX preparation. Significantly higher 2015 mean NAPLEX pass rates were found in public institutions, schools that do not provide NAPLEX prep, and schools spending less than $10,000 annually on NAPLEX prep. Only 18 schools reported providing PCOA preparation. Conclusion. Investment in NAPLEX and PCOA preparation resources vary widely across C/SOPs but may increase in the next few years, due to dropping NAPLEX pass rates and depending upon how PCOA data are used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NAPLEX; PCOA; licensing exam preparation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29109557      PMCID: PMC5663648          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8175909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  16 in total

1.  The effect of three commercial coaching courses on Step One USMLE performance.

Authors:  Leonard S Werner; Brian S Bull
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Does performance on school-administered mock boards predict performance on a dental licensure exam?

Authors:  Carol M Stewart; Robert E Bates; Gregory E Smith
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  The impact of a peer-designed and -led USMLE Step 1 review course: improvement in preparation and scores.

Authors:  Alicia M Alcamo; Abby R Davids; David P Way; D Joanne Lynn; Dale D Vandre
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Best practices in NCLEX-RN readiness preparation for baccalaureate student success.

Authors:  Karen H Frith; Jeanne P Sewell; Deborah J Clark
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications.

Authors:  David W Newton; Maria Boyle; Carmen A Catizone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Dental students' preparation and study habits for the National Board Dental Examination Part I.

Authors:  Nathan Hawley; Devin Johnson; Keith Packer; Marcia Ditmyer; Karl Kingsley
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Preparing to take the USMLE Step 1: a survey on medical students' self-reported study habits.

Authors:  Andre D Kumar; Monisha K Shah; Jason H Maley; Joshua Evron; Alex Gyftopoulos; Chad Miller
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Implementation of an integrated longitudinal curricular activity for graduating pharmacy students.

Authors:  Reza Karimi; Doug Meyer; Brad Fujisaki; Susan Stein
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  The effects of commercial coaching or the NBME Part I Examination.

Authors:  L K Scott; C W Scott; P A Palmisano; R D Cunningham; N J Cannon; S Brown
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1980-09

10.  Are study strategies related to medical licensing exam performance?

Authors:  Courtney West; Terri Kurz; Sherry Smith; Lori Graham
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Teaching Innovation and Creativity, or Teaching to the Test?

Authors:  Nancy Fjortoft; Jacob Gettig; Melinda Verdone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  An Exploratory Analysis of PharmD Program Value Using the Tuition: Licensure Index.

Authors:  Heath Ford
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Predictors of Success for the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination.

Authors:  Sharon K Park; Jennifer Phillips; Nina Pavuluri
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.047

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.