Literature DB >> 21088734

An electronic NAPLEX review program for longitudinal assessment of pharmacy students' knowledge.

Monina R Lahoz1, Paul Belliveau, Alice Gardner, Anna Morin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To track pharmacy student knowledge over time using a proprietary software program in an accelerated program for curricular assessment.
METHODS: All students were required to complete a computerized comprehensive diagnostic examination 3 times during the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) program: at the beginning of the second year, and near the end of the second and third years. The examination was comprised of 100 questions in 3 content areas: pharmacotherapy, preparation and dispensing of medications, and providing health care information. Within-subject differences in mean area and total percent scores were compared.
RESULTS: Based on 123 students' data, mean scores for pharmacotherapy and total percent scores for examination 1 were significantly different from examinations 2 and 3.
CONCLUSION: The computer-based comprehensive diagnostic examination shows promise for use as a component of a comprehensive assessment plan.

Keywords:  assessment; curricular assessment; doctor of pharmacy curriculum; longitudinal assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21088734      PMCID: PMC2972523          DOI: 10.5688/aj7407128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  5 in total

1.  Curricular progress assessments: the MileMarker.

Authors:  Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications.

Authors:  David W Newton; Maria Boyle; Carmen A Catizone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Taking responsibility for progress assessments.

Authors:  Julianna Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Progress examination for assessing students' readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Károly Mészáros; Mitchell J Barnett; Karna McDonald; Heidi Wehring; David J Evans; Debra Sasaki-Hill; Paul C Goldsmith; Katherine K Knapp
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 5.  Progress examinations in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Limited Predictive Utility of Admissions Scores and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations for APPE Performance.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Julia Khanova; Kelly Scolaro; Philip T Rodgers; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cherie Tsingos; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Implementation of an integrated longitudinal curricular activity for graduating pharmacy students.

Authors:  Reza Karimi; Doug Meyer; Brad Fujisaki; Susan Stein
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.