Literature DB >> 18465749

Automatic fMRI-guided MEG multidipole localization for visual responses.

Toni Auranen1, Aapo Nummenmaa, Simo Vanni, Aki Vehtari, Matti S Hämäläinen, Jouko Lampinen, Iiro P Jääskeläinen.   

Abstract

Previously, we introduced the use of individual cortical location and orientation constraints in the spatiotemporal Bayesian dipole analysis setting proposed by Jun et al. ([2005]; Neuroimage 28:84-98). However, the model's performance was limited by slow convergence and multimodality of the numerically estimated posterior distribution. In this paper, we present an intuitive way to exploit functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in the Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling -based inverse estimation of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data. We used simulated MEG and fMRI data to show that the convergence and localization accuracy of the method is significantly improved with the help of fMRI-guided proposal distributions. We further demonstrate, using an identical visual stimulation paradigm in both fMRI and MEG, the usefulness of this type of automated approach when investigating activation patterns with several spatially close and temporally overlapping sources. Theoretically, the MEG inverse estimates are not biased and should yield the same results even without fMRI information, however, in practice the multimodality of the posterior distribution causes problems due to the limited mixing properties of the sampler. On this account, the algorithm acts perhaps more as a stochastic optimizer than enables a full Bayesian posterior analysis. 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18465749      PMCID: PMC6870583          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  40 in total

1.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

Authors:  J C Mosher; R M Leahy; P S Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory.

Authors:  K J Friston; W Penny; C Phillips; S Kiebel; G Hinton; J Ashburner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  An empirical Bayesian solution to the source reconstruction problem in EEG.

Authors:  Christophe Phillips; Jeremie Mattout; Michael D Rugg; Pierre Maquet; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.

Authors:  Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Matti S Hämäläinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jouko Lampinen; Aki Vehtari; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Improving source detection and separation in a spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis.

Authors:  Sung C Jun; John S George; Sergey M Plis; Doug M Ranken; David M Schmidt; C C Wood
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J W Belliveau; D N Kennedy; R C McKinstry; B R Buchbinder; R M Weisskoff; M S Cohen; J M Vevea; T J Brady; B R Rosen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.

Authors:  S Baillet; L Garnero
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J D Watson; R Myers; R S Frackowiak; J V Hajnal; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta; S Shipp; S Zeki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  fMRI functional networks for EEG source imaging.

Authors:  Xu Lei; Peng Xu; Cheng Luo; Jinping Zhao; Dong Zhou; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects.

Authors:  Mia Liljeström; Annika Hultén; Lauri Parkkonen; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Electromagnetic brain imaging.

Authors:  Riitta Salmelin; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Concordance of MEG and fMRI patterns in adolescents during verb generation.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Scott K Holland; Jennifer Vannest
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Short-term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Mark L Andermann; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  A review of EEG and MEG for brainnetome research.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Xu Lei; Ting Wu; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Effects of reconstructed magnetic field from sparse noisy boundary measurements on localization of active neural source.

Authors:  Hui-min Shen; Kok-Meng Lee; Liang Hu; Shaohui Foong; Xin Fu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Optimization of retinotopy constrained source estimation constrained by prior.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.