Literature DB >> 26358243

Effects of reconstructed magnetic field from sparse noisy boundary measurements on localization of active neural source.

Hui-min Shen1, Kok-Meng Lee2,3, Liang Hu4, Shaohui Foong5, Xin Fu1.   

Abstract

Localization of active neural source (ANS) from measurements on head surface is vital in magnetoencephalography. As neuron-generated magnetic fields are extremely weak, significant uncertainties caused by stochastic measurement interference complicate its localization. This paper presents a novel computational method based on reconstructed magnetic field from sparse noisy measurements for enhanced ANS localization by suppressing effects of unrelated noise. In this approach, the magnetic flux density (MFD) in the nearby current-free space outside the head is reconstructed from measurements through formulating the infinite series solution of the Laplace's equation, where boundary condition (BC) integrals over the entire measurements provide "smooth" reconstructed MFD with the decrease in unrelated noise. Using a gradient-based method, reconstructed MFDs with good fidelity are selected for enhanced ANS localization. The reconstruction model, spatial interpolation of BC, parametric equivalent current dipole-based inverse estimation algorithm using reconstruction, and gradient-based selection are detailed and validated. The influences of various source depths and measurement signal-to-noise ratio levels on the estimated ANS location are analyzed numerically and compared with a traditional method (where measurements are directly used), and it was demonstrated that gradient-selected high-fidelity reconstructed data can effectively improve the accuracy of ANS localization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dipole localization; Gradient; Magnetoencephalography; Reconstruction; Spatial interpolation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26358243     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1381-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  15 in total

1.  Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.

Authors:  Fabio Babiloni; Claudio Babiloni; Filippo Carducci; Gian Luca Romani; Paolo M Rossini; Leonardo M Angelone; Febo Cincotti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A state-space modeling approach for localization of focal current sources from MEG.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Okito Yamashita; Atsunori Kanemura; Shin Ishii; Mitsuo Kawato; Masa-aki Sato
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Evaluation of signal space separation via simulation.

Authors:  Tao Song; Kathleen Gaa; Li Cui; Lori Feffer; Roland R Lee; Mingxiong Huang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing.

Authors:  Alicia Gonzalez-Moreno; Sara Aurtenetxe; Maria-Eugenia Lopez-Garcia; Francisco del Pozo; Fernando Maestu; Angel Nevado
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Spectral signal space projection algorithm for frequency domain MEG and EEG denoising, whitening, and source imaging.

Authors:  Rey R Ramírez; Brian H Kopell; Christopher R Butson; Bradley C Hiner; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components.

Authors:  M A Uusitalo; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Improving MEG performance with additional tangential sensors.

Authors:  Jussi Nurminen; Samu Taulu; Jukka Nenonen; Liisa Helle; Juha Simola; Antti Ahonen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Single and multiple clusters of magnetoencephalographic dipoles in neocortical epilepsy: significance in characterizing the epileptogenic zone.

Authors:  Makoto Oishi; Shigeki Kameyama; Hiroshi Masuda; Jun Tohyama; Osamu Kanazawa; Mutsuo Sasagawa; Hiroshi Otsubo
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

Authors:  S Taulu; J Simola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Clinical application of spatiotemporal distributed source analysis in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.

Authors:  Naoaki Tanaka; Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Integrated Giant Magnetoresistance Technology for Approachable Weak Biomagnetic Signal Detections.

Authors:  Hui-Min Shen; Liang Hu; Xin Fu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.