Literature DB >> 18442398

Meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage studies of asthma and related traits.

Samuel Denham1, Gerard H Koppelman, John Blakey, Matthias Wjst, Manuel A Ferreira, Ian P Hall, Ian Sayers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asthma and allergy are complex multifactorial disorders, with both genetic and environmental components determining disease expression. The use of molecular genetics holds great promise for the identification of novel drug targets for the treatment of asthma and allergy. Genome-wide linkage studies have identified a number of potential disease susceptibility loci but replication remains inconsistent. The aim of the current study was to complete a meta-analysis of data from genome-wide linkage studies of asthma and related phenotypes and provide inferences about the consistency of results and to identify novel regions for future gene discovery.
METHODS: The rank based genome-scan meta-analysis (GSMA) method was used to combine linkage data for asthma and related traits; bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR), allergen positive skin prick test (SPT) and total serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) from nine Caucasian asthma populations.
RESULTS: Significant evidence for susceptibility loci was identified for quantitative traits including; BHR (989 pedigrees, n = 4,294) 2p12-q22.1, 6p22.3-p21.1 and 11q24.1-qter, allergen SPT (1,093 pedigrees, n = 4,746) 3p22.1-q22.1, 17p12-q24.3 and total IgE (729 pedigrees, n = 3,224) 5q11.2-q14.3 and 6pter-p22.3. Analysis of the asthma phenotype (1,267 pedigrees, n = 5,832) did not identify any region showing genome-wide significance.
CONCLUSION: This study represents the first linkage meta-analysis to determine the relative contribution of chromosomal regions to the risk of developing asthma and atopy. Several significant results were obtained for quantitative traits but not for asthma confirming the increased phenotype and genetic heterogeneity in asthma. These analyses support the contribution of regions that contain previously identified asthma susceptibility genes and provide the first evidence for susceptibility loci on 5q11.2-q14.3 and 11q24.1-qter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442398      PMCID: PMC2391165          DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-9-38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Res        ISSN: 1465-9921


Background

Asthma is a disease characterised by recurrent respiratory symptoms, reversible variable airway obstruction, airway inflammation and increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness [1]. Estimates suggest that 100–150 million people worldwide have asthma. Atopy is a predisposition towards the development of immediate hypersensitivity against common environmental antigens. Atopy and asthma are closely related, however they are not interchangeable. Most asthmatic individuals are atopic but atopic individuals may not have asthmatic symptoms. Asthma and atopic disease show strong familial aggregation and heritability estimates vary between 36–79% [2]. A greater understanding of the genetic basis of asthma and atopy holds great promise for the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Linkage analysis using short tandem repeats or microsatellites to follow the transfer of genetic information between generations has been used to identify chromosomal regions that potentially contain asthma and atopy susceptibility genes. Commonly sub-phenotypes of clinical relevance are used including; elevated total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, atopy defined by positive skin prick test to one or more allergen or elevated specific IgE and bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) [3]. These studies have identified linkage on multiple chromosomal regions e.g. 2q22-33, 5q31.1-33, 6p21.3, 11q13, 12q14.3-24.1, 13q14, 14q11.2-13 and 19q13; however replication of linkage findings has been limited [3]. Low statistical power and the potential for type I and type II errors may explain these findings. Combining data has the potential to provide inferences about the consistency of results across studies and to identify regions that contain asthma and atopy susceptibility genes. The aim of the current study was to complete the first meta-analysis of available genome wide linkage data for asthma and related traits (asthma per se, BHR, total IgE, allergen skin prick test response (SPT)) in the Caucasian population using the Genome Scan Meta Analysis (GSMA) method [4]. GSMA is a non parametric, rank based approach and has been used extensively in other disorders e.g. schizophrenia [5].

Methods

Systematic Literature Search

To identify published studies for inclusion in the GSMA of asthma and related phenotypes we completed a systematic literature review in September 2006. We used PubMed and the following search string (Asthma OR BHR OR bronchial hyper responsiveness OR bronchial hyperreactivity OR AHR OR airway hyper responsiveness OR respiratory hypersensitivity OR histamine OR slope OR methacholine OR atopy OR atopic OR dermatitis, atopic OR IgE OR immunoglobulin E OR SPT OR skin prick tests OR skin tests) AND linkage AND genome-scan OR scan OR genome OR genomewide OR genome-wide OR LOD OR microsatellite). Limits were set on the search including; published in English, human studies, published 1996–2006 and the exclusion of reviews. This initial search identified 516 matches of which 488 were discarded as not containing genome-wide linkage data. A further eight studies were discarded as they were in non-Caucasian populations and we wished to avoid any population stratification issues leaving 20 potential Caucasian studies for inclusion. Genome-wide linkage analyses for asthma related traits in the Hutterite Founder population [6] was not included in the current analyses as limited data was available and the focus of the present study was Caucasian out-bred populations. Of the 20 manuscripts identified a further nine were removed from the analyses for a combination of the following reasons; the study was superseded by another including the families from the original, LOD score plots in the manuscript were not labelled and/or unreadable, no genome-wide data was presented e.g. in the manuscript describing the positional cloning of ADAM33, linkage analyses in 460 families for asthma, IgE and BHR phenotypes were performed but has never been published in full [7] or the phenotypes studied did not meet our criteria. All authors were contacted and invited to provide complete datasets.

Phenotype definition and study inclusion/exclusion

There was a large degree of heterogeneity in phenotype definitions and so these were standardised for inclusion. Asthma was defined using doctor diagnosis and/or currently taking asthma medication, however we did include data from the Dutch population which used an algorithm based on asthma symptoms, the presence of BHR, reversibility to β2-adrenergic receptor agonist and smoking history to define asthma [8]. Analyses were completed with and without the Dutch families. Total IgE levels were analysed in the genome scans using quantitative data generated by Pharmacia CAP system [9], Pharmacia IgE EIA [10], Phadebas PRIST [11] and ELISA techniques [12,13] which have shown good inter assay correlation [14,15], therefore all studies were included. Positive skin prick response to one or more allergen was used as a marker of atopy and for inclusion in the GSMA. However, allergens used in each study varied; Dermatphagoides pteronyssinus, mixed grass pollen [9], Dermatphagoides pteronyssinus, Cladosporium herbarum, Alternaria tenuis, timothy grass, olive, birch, Parieteria judaica, ragweed, Aspergillus, Blatella Germancia [11], mixed grass and tree pollens, mixed weeds, Dermatphagoides pteronyssinus, dog, cat, a mixture of guinea pig and rabbit, horse, Aspergillus fumigatus, Alternaria alternate [10], house dust mite [12], Dermatphagoides pteronyssinus and 10 others [13] and Dermatphagoides pteronyssinus, D. farinae, dog, cat, grass mix, pollen and alternaria [16]. BHR was measured in multiple ways using different provocation stimuli e.g. histamine or methacholine providing categorical and/or quantitative analyses. These provocation stimuli have shown a significant correlation (r = 0.95) in the responses induced [17], however it is worth noting that this has not been reproduced in all studies. Studies with BHR data were included in the GSMA irrespective of the criteria used in the original manuscript.

Genome Scan Meta Analysis (GSMA)

GSMA was used as it is able to combine linkage data from studies with different marker sets and analysed by different methods including permutated p-values. GSMA was implemented using GSMA software [4,5,18]. Briefly, the genome was divided into 120 bins of approximately 30 cM, for each study the maximum evidence for linkage e.g. LOD score or p-value was identified for each bin and these bins were then ranked relative to their evidence for linkage in that study. These ranks were summed across studies and the summed rank (SR) forms the basis of the test statistic [4]. An ordered rank (OR) statistic was also generated which gives a genome wide interpretation of significance by comparing the n-th highest summed rank with the distribution of the n-th highest summed ranks obtained through simulation [5]. We completed an unweighted and weighted analyses using information content (√(no. pedigrees × no. markers)) as a weighting factor.

Statistical Significance

Simulation studies have shown that any bin with a p(SR) < 0.05 and a p(OR) < 0.05 has a high probability of containing a true susceptibility gene [5]. Applying Bonferroni correction a p < 0.000417 provides evidence for genome wide significance for linkage and a p < 0.0083 provides suggestive evidence for linkage [5].

Results

Data included

The selection criteria and data requests provided eleven studies of nine Caucasian asthma populations for our analyses (Table 1) including data from 1,267 pedigrees (n = 5,832) for asthma (80.2% of pedigrees available in the public domain or following request, missing 249 [19] and 65 pedigrees [20]), 989 pedigrees (n = 4,294) for BHR (79.9% of available, missing 249 pedigrees [19]), 1,093 pedigrees (n = 4,746) for SPT (81.5% of available, missing 249 pedigrees [19]) and 729 pedigrees (n = 3,224) for total IgE (65.9% of available, missing 249 [19], and 129 pedigrees [21]).
Table 1

Characteristics of genome-wide linkage studies included in the GSMA

NUMBER OF.(b)

COHORT (REF.)PHENOTYPES(a)PED. (AFF/IND.)MKS.WF.MKR MAP (SP.)(c)STUDY TYPE(d)ANALYSIS PROGRAMINCLUDED IN GSMA
Australian [9]B: Slope (-,0–12 μmol meth.)80 (25/364)253142.267- (10 cM)Nonpar.two.-B: 23 p-values < 0.05
I: QuantitativeI: 21 p-values < 0.05
S: 2 allergensS: 19 p-values < 0.05
CSGA [33]A: Quest./Doc diag79 (200/316)360168.642Marshfield (10 cM)Nonpar. multi.Modified GENEHUNTERA: LOD scores from graphs
German [34]B: PD20 (Neb, < 8 mg/ml meth.)97 (200/415)333179.725Modified Genethon (10.7 cM)Nonpar. multi.GENEHUNTER, MAP-MAKER/SIBSB: Complete dataset
French [11]A: Quest./Meds.46 (102/210)254108.093– (13 cM)Nonpar. multi.GENEHUNTER, SIBPAIRA: 11 p-values
B: Slope (-, meth.)B: 8 p-values
I: QuantitativeI: 8 p-values
S: 11 allergensS: 19 p-values
Icelandic [35]A: Doc diag./Meds.175 (596/1134)976*413.280Decode (4 cM)Nonpar. multi.ALLEGROA: LOD scores from graphs
Dutch [10, 36, 37]A: Algorithm200 (-/1159)366270.555Marshfield Weber v8 (10 cM)Nonpar.SOLAR, GENEHUNTERA: Complete dataset
B: PD20 (-, < 32 mg/ml hist.)B: Complete dataset
I: QuantitativeI: Complete dataset
S: 16 allergensS: Complete dataset
German [12]A: Doc diag.201 (506/867)364270.489Modified Genethon (10 cM)Nonpar. multi.MERLINA: Complete dataset
I: Quantitative/CatagoricalI: Complete quantitative dataset
S: HDM+S: Complete dataset
Australian [13]A: Quest./Meds.202 (169/591)624355.032- (7.1 cM)Nonpar. multi.MERLIN, SOLARA: Complete dataset
B: PD20 (-, < 7.8 μmol hist)B: Complete dataset
I: QuantitativeI: Complete dataset
S: 11 allergens.S: Complete dataset
GAIN [16]A: Doc diag.364 (1014/1555)396*379.663Decode (-)Nonpar. multi.MERLINA: LOD scores from graphs
B: PD20 (-, < 8 mg/ml meth.)B: LOD scores from graphs
S: 7 allergensS: LOD scores from graphs

(a) A = asthma; B = bronchial hyper-responsiveness (Neb = nebuliser, Dos = dosimeter); I = total serum IgE; S = skin prick test response; Quest = questionnaire; Doc diag = doctor diagnosis; Meds = asthma medication; Meth = methacholine; Hist = histamine; HDM = house dust mite; PD20 = provocation dose resulting in a 20% fall in FEV1. (b) Ped = total genotyped pedigrees; AFF = total genotyped asthmatic cases, Ind = total genotyped individuals; Mks = total autosomal microsatellite markers; Wt = weighting factor. (c) Sp = average marker spacing. (d) Nonpar = nonparametric; Two = two point; Multi = multipoint. (-) = not provided, *number of autosomal markers not given, total number used for weighting.

Characteristics of genome-wide linkage studies included in the GSMA (a) A = asthma; B = bronchial hyper-responsiveness (Neb = nebuliser, Dos = dosimeter); I = total serum IgE; S = skin prick test response; Quest = questionnaire; Doc diag = doctor diagnosis; Meds = asthma medication; Meth = methacholine; Hist = histamine; HDM = house dust mite; PD20 = provocation dose resulting in a 20% fall in FEV1. (b) Ped = total genotyped pedigrees; AFF = total genotyped asthmatic cases, Ind = total genotyped individuals; Mks = total autosomal microsatellite markers; Wt = weighting factor. (c) Sp = average marker spacing. (d) Nonpar = nonparametric; Two = two point; Multi = multipoint. (-) = not provided, *number of autosomal markers not given, total number used for weighting.

Asthma

The weighted asthma analyses did not identify any chromosomal region with a p(SR) and p(OR) < 0.05 (Figure 1 and Table 2). No bin p(SR) met genome wide significance (p < 0.000417) or suggestive evidence for linkage (p < 0.0083) in these analyses however three regions demonstrated a p(SR) < 0.05; 6p22.3-p21.1, 10p14-q11.21 and 12q24.31-qter (Table 2). Eight regions met suggestive linkage criteria in the ordered rank analyses; 1p31.1-p13.3, 2p12-q22.1, 4p14-q13.3, 7q34-qter, 12pter-p12,1, 12p12.1-p11.21, 14q32.12-qter, 17pter-p12 and 20pter-p12.3 (Table 2). Analyses of the asthma phenotype using unweighted GSMA generated similar findings to the weighted analyses (Figure 2). To confirm that the inclusion of the Dutch linkage data for the asthma phenotype (defined by algorithm) had not confounded the analyses we completed GSMA without these data focusing on doctor diagnosed asthma only (1,067 pedigrees). Again, no chromosomal region with a p(SR) and p(OR) < 0.05 was identified (data not shown).
Figure 1

p(SR) & p(OR) in weighted GSMA. A. asthma. B. bronchial hyper-responsiveness. C. total serum IgE. D. skin prick test response. A p(SR) of p < 0.000417 = significant linkage, p < 0.0083 = suggestive linkage. p(SR) & p(OR) data were transformed using f(x) = 0.05/x and plotted on a log10 scale to improve clarity.

Table 2

Weighted GSMA for Asthma (1,267 pedigrees, n = 5,832)

PROBABILITY

BIN(a)GENETIC LOCUS(b)DISTANCE (cM)(c)PHYSICAL POSITION (KB)(d)SUMMED RANK (SR)p(SR)p(OR)
11pter-p36.230.00–20.61pter-9332376.5760.681210.03775
51p31.1-p13.3113.69–142.2482867–110103346.8340.782590.00718*
81q31.1-q32201.58–231.11185232–210150347.8720.779370.02791
152p12-q22.1101.56–128.4179617–119705341.1740.799740.00694*
182q31.1-q34177.53–206.74172805–212021317.9850.861700.03548
202q35-qter233.62–269.07230618-qter316.1690.866030.00908
243p14.1-q12.388.60–117.7664182–103187612.9210.023480.80059
314p14-q13.351.60–78.9738279–72275343.9390.791520.00714*
344q28.3-q32.1134.74–159.30137492–160828346.9920.782120.01609
436pter-p22.30.00–32.62pter-16854383.7470.654330.03220
446p22.3-p21.132.62–65.1416854–43207592.7400.039050.72593
507p21.1-p14.129.28–59.9319430–40230317.7790.862180.01583
537q31.1-q34122.48–148.1175216–138638381.6500.662300.03107
547q34-qter148.11–181.97138638-qter313.7410.871520.00536*
558pter-p220.00–27.40pter-13111376.3680.681960.01899
598q22-q24.21110.2–137.9299237–127416365.8040.719990.02820
608q24.21-qter137.92–167.90127416-qter373.1410.693780.02636
629p22.3-p21.127.32–53.6014264–29850349.9260.772910.03321
6810p14-q11.2129.15–62.2310591–36230635.6590.012290.79026
7511p12-q13.347.06–72.8236450–70234353.4730.761550.02578
7912pter-p12.10.00–24.45pter-11686299.2780.901800.00570*
8012p12.1-p11.2124.45–53.2811686–32879292.2280.914660.00766*
8412q24.31-qter139.61–170.60120806-qter607.3880.027140.65821
8713q22.2-q33.158.54–85.4174875–102346354.4690.758310.04007
8914pter-q13.10.00–40.11pter- 33529362.3660.731820.03622
9214q32.12-qter105.00-138.1890647-qter305.5390.889320.00423*
10117pter-p120.00–25.14pter-11325312.7680.873740.00213*
10518pter-p110.00–24.08pter- 7462377.8420.676500.04965
11320pter-p12.30.00–21.15pter-7608339.1110.805870.00524*
11420p12.3-p1121.15–47.527608–21259282.9350.929820.01324

Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Figure 2

p(SR) & p(OR) in unweighted GSMA. A. asthma. B. bronchial hyper-responsiveness. C. total serum IgE. D. skin prick test response. A p(SR) of p < 0.000417 = significant linkage, p < 0.0083 = suggestive linkage. p(SR) & p(OR) data were transformed using f(x) = 0.05/x and plotted on a log10 scale to improve clarity.

p(SR) & p(OR) in weighted GSMA. A. asthma. B. bronchial hyper-responsiveness. C. total serum IgE. D. skin prick test response. A p(SR) of p < 0.000417 = significant linkage, p < 0.0083 = suggestive linkage. p(SR) & p(OR) data were transformed using f(x) = 0.05/x and plotted on a log10 scale to improve clarity. Weighted GSMA for Asthma (1,267 pedigrees, n = 5,832) Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5]. p(SR) & p(OR) in unweighted GSMA. A. asthma. B. bronchial hyper-responsiveness. C. total serum IgE. D. skin prick test response. A p(SR) of p < 0.000417 = significant linkage, p < 0.0083 = suggestive linkage. p(SR) & p(OR) data were transformed using f(x) = 0.05/x and plotted on a log10 scale to improve clarity.

Bronchial Hyper-responsiveness

The weighted BHR analyses strongly suggested that 6p22.3-p21.1 contains BHR susceptibility gene(s) as a p(SR) and p(OR) < 0.05 was observed (p = 0.007, p = 0.049 respectively (Figure 1 and Table 3)). Two other regions showed suggestive evidence (p < 0.0083) for linkage to the BHR phenotype; 2p12-q22.1 (p(SR) = 0.006) and 11q24.1-qter (p(SR) = 0.005). In the unweighted analyses three regions showed evidence for linkage (p(SR) and p(OR) ≤ 0.05), i.e. 2q22.1-q23.3, 7q12.11-q31.1 and 5q23.2-q34 (Figure 2).
Table 3

Weighted GSMA for bronchial hyper-responsiveness (989 pedigrees, n = 4,294)

PROBABILITY

BIN(a)GENETIC LOCUS(b)DISTANCE (cM)(c)PHYSICAL POSITION (KB)(d)SUMMED RANK (SR)p(SR)p(OR)
142p16.2-p1276.34–101.5654063–79617532.8550.027510.22094
152p12-q22.1101.56–128.4179617–119705576.5850.00574*0.14743
162q22.1-q23.3128.41–154.48119705–151529518.5930.040850.08859
415q23.2-q34131.48–164.19123774–162087551.7010.015110.09586
446p22.3-p21.132.62–65.1416854–43207571.3810.00716*0.04861
507p21.1-p14.129.28–59.9319430–40230523.3670.035970.24658
517p14.1-q21.1159.93–91.6740230–81002518.7460.040700.19114
527q21.11-q31.191.67–122.4881002–109766461.3800.139260.02065
588q13.1-q2282.84–110.2067744–99237468.1880.123120.04443
7611q13.3-q22.372.82–98.9870185–103732465.5890.129130.01652
7811q24.1-qter123.00–147.77122977-qter579.5200.00505*0.46485
8613q13.2-q22.226.87–58.5433636–74875472.9990.112550.03312
11119q12-q13.3352.59–75.4135843–54589460.7590.140780.01070
11520p11-q13.1347.52–72.2721259–46747476.3080.105630.03503
11620q13.13-qter72.27–101.2246747-qter467.5930.124480.02343

Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Weighted GSMA for bronchial hyper-responsiveness (989 pedigrees, n = 4,294) Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Positive allergen skin prick test

Weighted analyses of the SPT phenotype identified two regions that had a p(SR) and p(OR) ≤ 0.05 strongly suggesting these regions are susceptibility loci (Figure 1 and Table 4). These regions are 17p12-q24.3 (two adjacent bins, 17p12-q21.33 p(SR) = 0.00043, p(OR) = 0.050 and 17q21.33-q24.3 p(SR) = 0.047, p(OR) = 0.038) and region 3p22.1-q22.1 (three adjacent bins, 3p22.1-p14.1 p(SR) = 0.045, p(OR) = 0.063, 3p14.1-q12.3 p(SR) = 0.003, p(OR) = 0.0045 and 3q12.3-q22.1 p(SR) = 0.00084, p(OR) = 0.00406). The analyses of the unweighted SPT datasets identified chromosomes 3 and 17 as containing the major determinants (Figure 2).
Table 4

Weighted GSMA for skin prick test response (1,093 pedigrees, n = 4,746)

PROBABILITY

BIN(a)GENETIC LOCUS(b)DIST. (cM)(c)PHYS POS. (KB)(d)SUMMED RANK (SR)p(SR)p(OR)
61p13.3-q23.3142.24–170.84110103–159125541.2710.020810.22906
233p22.1-p14.163.12–88.6038845–64182513.8690.044880.06344
243p14.1-q12.388.60–117.7664182–103187591.3920.00298*0.00450
253q12.3-q22.1117.76–146.60103187–134474614.3730.00084*0.00406
456p21.1-q1565.14–99.0143207–90985521.7170.036540.12598
466q15-q23.299.01–131.0790985–132584525.2760.033180.18839
7711q22.3-q24.198.98–123.00103732–122977515.7460.042760.11460
10217p12-q21.3325.14–63.6211325–39726624.7770.00043*0.05044
10317q21.33-q24.363.62–93.9839726–66600511.1870.047990.03824
10818q22.1-qter96.48–126.0060025-qter209.8390.961320.03480
11821q21.3-qter25.26–57.7727903-qter528.5360.030290.28738

Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Weighted GSMA for skin prick test response (1,093 pedigrees, n = 4,746) Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Total Immunoglobulin E

Weighted analyses of the IgE phenotype strongly suggested 5q11.2-q14.3 (p(SR) = 0.031, p(OR) = 0.060) and 6pter-p22.3 (p(SR) = 0.033, p(OR) = 0.026) contain genes that influence IgE levels (Figure 1 and Table 5). The region adjacent to 6pter-p22.3, i.e. 6p22.3-p21.1 has a p(SR) = 0.00999 approaching suggestive linkage providing further evidence for this region. Analyses of the IgE phenotype using the unweighted GSMA showed similar overall findings (Figure 2).
Table 5

Weighted GSMA for total serum IgE (729 pedigrees, n = 3,224)

PROBABILITY

BIN(a)GENETIC LOCUS(b)DIST. (cM)(c)PHYS POS. (KB)(d)SUMMED RANK (SR)p(SR)p(OR)
21p36.23-p35.320.61–54.309332 – 24723476.2510.011710.41867
71q23.3-q31.1170.84–201.58159125–185232450.6590.030990.14664
395q11.2-q14.364.14–97.8255758–88765450.3030.031270.06031
415q23.2-q34131.48–164.19123774–162087464.6110.018900.40276
436pter-p22.30.00–32.62pter-16854448.9030.032760.02583
446p22.3-p21.132.62–65.1416854–43207479.7230.009990.71984
507p21.1-p14.129.28–59.9319430–40230454.7060.027080.41494
7611q13.3-q22.372.82–98.9870185–103732453.7630.027920.22926

Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Weighted GSMA for total serum IgE (729 pedigrees, n = 3,224) Chromosomal regions with a p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.05 are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage [5].

Multiple phenotype analyses

In addition to the primary phenotype analyses we investigated overlapping chromosomal regions containing genetic determinants of asthma and asthma related traits consistent with gene(s) having pleiotrophic effects in asthma and allergy (Table 6). Interestingly, region 6p22.3-p21.1 which contains the HLA region showed a p(SR) < 0.05 in the asthma, BHR and IgE analyses potentially as expected due to the role of HLA restriction in many immunological mechanisms. Several other regions also showed overlapping concordance, in particular regions; 3p14.1-q12.3 (asthma, SPT), 5q23.2-q34 (asthma, BHR, IgE) and 7p21.1-14.1 (asthma, BHR, IgE).
Table 6

Overlapping chromosomal regions in weighted GSMA for asthma, and the three intermediate phenotypes

ASTHMABHRTOTAL IGESPT RESPONSE




BIN(a)GENETIC LOCUS(b)DIST. (cM)(c)PHYS POS. (KBp)(d)p(SR)p(OR)p(SR)p(OR)p(SR)p(OR)p(SR)p(OR)
61p13.3-q23.3142.24–170.84110103–159125----0.066300.131550.020810.22906
71q23.3-q31.1170.84–201.58159125–185232----0.030990.146640.089240.13402
152p12-q22.1101.56–128.4179617–1197050.799740.006940.00574*0.14743----
243p14.1-q12.388.60–117.7664182–1031870.023480.800590.093120.17837--0.002980.00450*
405q5q14.3-q23.297.82–131.4888765–1237740.718790.05004--0.091950.08596--
415q23.2-q34131.48–164.19123774–1620870.060270.778860.015110.095860.018900.40276--
436pter-p22.30.00–32.62pter-168540.654330.03220--0.032760.02583--
446p22.3-p21.132.62–65.1416854–432070.039050.725930.00716*0.048610.009990.719840.099340.16043
456p21.1-q1565.14–99.0143207–90985--0.071280.19832--0.036540.12598
466q15-q23.299.01–131.0790985–132584--0.094450.10925--0.033180.18839
507p21.1-p14.129.28–59.9319430–402300.862180.015830.035970.246580.027080.41494--
558pter-p220.00–27.40pter-131110.681960.01899----0.060270.07341
7110q23.33-q26.13117.42–142.7895985–1232740.858050.056640.169850.08106----
7611q13.3-q22.372.82–98.9870185–103732--0.129130.016520.027920.22926--
7711q22.3-q24.198.98–123.00103732–122977----0.088900.128870.042760.11460
7811q24.1-qter123.00–147.77122977-qter--0.00505*0.46485--0.080720.12542
8412q24.31-qter139.61–170.60120806-qter0.027140.65821--0.071750.10909--
8513pter-q13.20.00–26.87pter-33636--0.055210.186860.088350.22042--
9214q32.12-qter105.00–138.1890647-qter0.889320.00423*----0.957080.07887
10818q22.1-qter96.48–126.0060025-qter--0.081900.24216--0.961320.03480
11520p11-q13.1347.52–72.2721259–467470.654240.061840.105630.03503----
11821q21.3-qter25.26–57.7727903-qter--0.204020.09140--0.030290.28738

Chromosomal regions with p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.1 in two or more weighted GSMA are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage.

Overlapping chromosomal regions in weighted GSMA for asthma, and the three intermediate phenotypes Chromosomal regions with p(SR) or p(OR) < 0.1 in two or more weighted GSMA are shown. aBin number from GSMA (1–120 inclusive). bCytogenetic band (Taken from April 2002 Genome Browser, UCSC). cGenetic distance in Marshfield cM (not cumulative). dPhysical position in kilobase pairs (Taken from December 2006 UniSTS, NCBI/Genome Browser, UCSC). *p < 0.000417 = Genome wide significance for linkage, p < 0.0083 = Suggestive for linkage.

Discussion

This study represents the first meta-analysis of asthma and related trait linkage data using the majority of the data available for the Caucasian asthma cohorts in the public domain. This analysis combines data from 10 years of asthma and atopy genetics and is extremely timely providing a definitive analysis of available linkage data to complement the highly anticipated whole genome association findings. Analysis of asthma and atopy quantitative traits identified significant evidence for relatively few chromosomal regions as containing susceptibility gene(s) using the most stringent genome-wide criteria i.e. BHR (6p22.3-p21.1), total IgE (5q11.2-q14.3 and 6pter-p22.3) and positive allergen skin prick test (3p22.1-q22.1, 17p12-q24.3). Significantly no chromosomal region met stringent genome-wide criteria in the asthma phenotype analyses. This study did provide supporting evidence for regions containing previously identified asthma susceptibility genes. Linkage analyses has proven to be highly successful in single gene disorders e.g. cystic fibrosis but has been problematic in asthma and atopy mainly due to the complex genetic basis of these phenotypes and the use of inadequate samples sizes leading to both type I and type II errors. In the current study we aimed to combine all available linkage data for asthma and related trait phenotypes (BHR, total IgE, positive allergen skin prick test) and provide inferences about the consistency of results across studies, ultimately providing a focus for future gene discovery. The analyses of the quantitative traits provided the most significant findings and may be consistent with the observation that using objective markers of disease adds to the homogeneity of the data and may improve results. In addition the number of genes regulating these phenotypes may be smaller than "asthma" and power to find these may be increased. This study strongly suggested that regions 17p12-q21.33 and 3p14.1q22.1 contain gene(s) that influence allergen skin prick responses and by inference atopy. Both of these regions are large spanning 28.5 and 70.3 Mbp respectively. The 3p21 region has been identified as containing genetic determinants of specific allergen responses in the Hutterite founder asthma cohort [22] and has been identified as an atopic dermatitis locus (3p24-22) [23]. Linkage to chromosome 17 and specific allergen responses has been described in the Hutterite population however these linkages map to 17q25 in asthma [22]. Linkage to atopic dermatitis on 17q23.1 has been reported [23]. Also of significance is the fact that the chromosome 17 locus (17p12-q21.33) identified in the current analyses contains the recently identified ORMDL3 gene [24]. Using whole genome association variants in the ORMDL3 gene were shown to be associated with childhood onset asthma [24]. Overall our data suggest that the major genes influencing allergen skin prick responses are found on chromosomes 3 and 17. In the total IgE analyses there was strong evidence for the presence of genes(s) regulating IgE production in the 5q11.2-q14.3 and 6pter-p21.1 regions. This region on chromosome 6 contains the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) locus and so may be predicted to contain determinants of immunological processes. The finding that 5q11.2-q14.3 may contain gene(s) that influence IgE production is novel and warrants further investigation. The IgE analyses also confirmed the potential contribution of genes within the 5q23.2-q34 and 11q13.3-q22.3 regions that have previously been suggested [25]. Interestingly, of the four positionally cloned genes identified using IgE as a key phenotype only the region encompassing the GPRA gene showed limited (non significant) linkage (7p21.1-p14.1, p(SR) = 0.027). In the BHR analyses the 6p22.3-p21.1 region was identified as containing susceptibility gene(s). This region contains the HLA locus and the HLA-G gene within this region has previously been identified as a potential asthma and BHR susceptibility gene using four cohorts (including the Dutch cohort used in the current analyses) [26]. Our data confirms this region as a BHR locus and less significantly a potential asthma locus (p(SR) = 0.039). Interestingly, four of the six populations used for the BHR analyses ranked the chromosome 2p locus identified in the top 33% of bins including the Genetics of Asthma International Network (GAIN) study (data not shown). Further mapping of the 2p locus in the GAIN population using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) spanning the region refined the linkage peak to ~70 cM with the greatest evidence being for the BHR phenotype (LOD score 4.58) [16]. Region 2p12-q22.1 contains the DPP10 gene that has previously been identified as an asthma and total IgE susceptibility gene [27] and the IL1RN gene identified using asthma as the primary phenotype [28]. The identification of 11q24.1-qter as a potential BHR susceptibility locus appears to be novel and therefore these data may provide a platform for novel BHR susceptibility gene identification. The BHR analyses also confirmed the potentially modest contribution of other loci in determining the BHR phenotype including e.g. 5q23.2-q34 and 19q12-q13.33. In the analyses of the BHR phenotype significant linkage was not driven by studies using a specific agonist i.e. studies using both methacholine and histamine provocation contributed to the signal at a specific locus (data not shown). These data suggest responsiveness to these agents share a common genetic basis and provide support for combining studies in the meta-analyses using these different provocation stimuli. Significantly, using asthma as a phenotype we did not identify any chromosomal region as showing genome-wide significance in our analyses. In most studies, asthma was defined as a doctor's diagnosis. In the Dutch study, families were ascertained through a proband with a doctor's diagnosis of asthma. In the offspring of these asthma patients, an algorithm was used since a doctor's diagnosis per se underestimated the prevalence of asthma in the offspring [8]. To confirm that the inclusion of the Dutch linkage data for the asthma phenotype had not confounded the analyses we completed GSMA without these data and again no chromosomal region with a p(SR) and p(OR) < 0.05 was identified (data not shown). These data may reflect the true locus heterogeneity in asthma or reflect differences in phenotype definition when comparing asthma based on doctors' diagnosis over different cohorts. In addition the use if a binary trait i.e. affection will have the lowest intrinsic power compared to continual data e.g. IgE levels. Interestingly, the recently published whole genome association study using 994 asthmatic children and 1,243 non asthmatic children identified only 16 SNPs (eight on chromosome 17) from a total of 317,447 SNPs tested showing a significant association with asthma per se (5% false discovery threshold, stratification corrected) [24]. This study complements our analysis using data from 1,257 families and taken together suggests that the use of asthma as a phenotype may be confounded due to locus heterogeneity in asthma and/or issues concerning phenotype definition/heterogeneity when combining cohorts. It is important to note that the family based studies included in this meta-analyses address the genetic basis of asthma defined in children i.e. the mean age of siblings in most studies is < 16 years. Several regions showed suggestive evidence for linkage to the asthma phenotype mainly based on the p(OR) statistic, however caution should be taken interpreting p(OR) in isolation, especially in the presence of incomplete data sets [5]. Further evidence for the chromosome 12 and 20 loci comes from the finding that adjacent bins have a p(OR) < 0.05 suggesting the linkage is spanning the bin interval. 4/6 regions containing the positionally cloned asthma susceptibility genes i.e. ADAM33 (20p13[7]), PHF11 (13q14.3 [29]), DPP10 (2q14.1 [27]), HLAG (6p21.3 [26]), GPRA (7p14.3 [30]), IL1RN (2q13 [28]) and the recently reported gene ORMDL3 (17q12-q21[24]) were identified by the GSMA approach, ADAM33 (p(OR) = 0.005), DPP10 and IL1RN (p(OR) = 0.007) and less significantly HLA-G (p(SR) = 0.039) and GRPA (p(OR) = 0.031). In addition our data also suggests that further investigation of additional chromosomal regions may be productive e.g. 1p31.1-p13.3 and 14q32.12-qter. Recently, the 1p31 and 14q32 regions have been highlighted as potential asthma loci in a French cohort with data suggesting 1p31 may contain gene(s) of importance to asthma and atopic dermatitis co morbidity and the 14q32 locus may interact with smoking exposure and contain asthma susceptibility gene(s) [31,32]. The analysis of overlap between chromosomal regions confirmed the importance of the HLA locus on chromosome 6 as being a key susceptibility locus in asthma and also highlighted other regions that may be of importance i.e. 5q23.2-q34 and 7p21.1-14.1. The 5q23.2-q34 region contains the cytokine gene cluster (IL4, Il13, IL5, IL12B) and has previously been suggested as an asthma/atopy susceptibility locus [3] and the 7p21.1-14.1 region contains the previously identified asthma susceptibility gene, GPRA (7p14.3) [30]. In conclusion, we present the first systematic meta-analyses of asthma and related trait linkage data in the Caucasian population. These data are based on the majority of the data available in the public domain (or through collaboration) therefore we do not consider that exclusion or missing data for other populations has biased our analyses. While the GSMA method has limitations e.g. only large chromosomal regions can be identified, these analyses have determined the role of several previously identified susceptibility loci and highlighted the significance of regions not previously implicated in asthma and atopy susceptibility. Importantly, this study also highlighted the limitations of using asthma as a phenotype in contrast to quantitative traits even with the increased power of 1,267 families composed of 5,832 individuals. Finally, these data will provide useful guidance for the interpretation of the anticipated genome wide association analyses in asthma and atopy.

List of abbreviations

GSMA: Genome Scan Meta-analysis; SPT: allergen positive skin prick test; IgE: total serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE); BHR: bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

IS designed the study, compiled and interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. SD contributed to the study design, completed the data analyses and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. GHK, MW and MAF provided datasets, contributed to the design of the study and the writing of the manuscript. JB and IPH contributed to the design of the study and the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  37 in total

Review 1.  The importance of genetic influences in asthma.

Authors:  H Los; G H Koppelman; D S Postma
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  Genome-wide linkage analyses of total serum IgE using variance components analysis in asthmatic families.

Authors:  R A Mathias; L R Freidhoff; M N Blumenthal; D A Meyers; L Lester; R King; J F Xu; J Solway; K C Barnes; J Pierce; O C Stine; A Togias; W Oetting; P L Marshik; J B Hetmanski; S K Huang; E Ehrlich; G M Dunston; F Malveaux; S Banks-Schlegel; N J Cox; E Bleecker; C Ober; T H Beaty; S S Rich
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Meta-analysis of genome searches.

Authors:  L H Wise; J S Lanchbury; C M Lewis
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  A second-generation genomewide screen for asthma-susceptibility alleles in a founder population.

Authors:  C Ober; A Tsalenko; R Parry; N J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Genome screen for asthma and related phenotypes in the French EGEA study.

Authors:  M H Dizier; C Besse-Schmittler; M Guilloud-Bataille; I Annesi-Maesano; M Boussaha; J Bousquet; D Charpin; A Degioanni; F Gormand; A Grimfeld; J Hochez; G Hyne; A Lockhart; M Luillier-Lacombe; R Matran; F Meunier; F Neukirch; Y Pacheco; V Parent; E Paty; I Pin; C Pison; P Scheinmann; N Thobie; D Vervloet; F Kauffmann; J Feingold; M Lathrop; F Demenais
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Genome-wide search for atopy susceptibility genes in Dutch families with asthma.

Authors:  Gerard H Koppelman; O Colin Stine; Jianfeng Xu; Timothy D Howard; Siqun L Zheng; Henk F Kauffman; Eugene R Bleecker; Deborah A Meyers; Dirkje S Postma
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis on chromosomes 3, 13, 15, 17 and 18 in a Swedish population.

Authors:  M Bradley; C Söderhäll; H Luthman; C-F Wahlgren; I Kockum; M Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Association of the ADAM33 gene with asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Authors:  Paul Van Eerdewegh; Randall D Little; Josée Dupuis; Richard G Del Mastro; Kathy Falls; Jason Simon; Dana Torrey; Sunil Pandit; Joyce McKenny; Karen Braunschweiger; Alison Walsh; Ziying Liu; Brooke Hayward; Colleen Folz; Susan P Manning; Alicia Bawa; Lisa Saracino; Michelle Thackston; Youssef Benchekroun; Neva Capparell; Mei Wang; Ron Adair; Yun Feng; JoAnn Dubois; Michael G FitzGerald; Hui Huang; René Gibson; Kristina M Allen; Alex Pedan; Melvyn R Danzig; Shelby P Umland; Robert W Egan; Francis M Cuss; Steuart Rorke; Joanne B Clough; John W Holloway; Stephen T Holgate; Tim P Keith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Major genes regulating total serum immunoglobulin E levels in families with asthma.

Authors:  J Xu; D S Postma; T D Howard; G H Koppelman; S L Zheng; O C Stine; E R Bleecker; D A Meyers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 11.043

10.  Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma.

Authors:  Miriam F Moffatt; Michael Kabesch; Liming Liang; Anna L Dixon; David Strachan; Simon Heath; Martin Depner; Andrea von Berg; Albrecht Bufe; Ernst Rietschel; Andrea Heinzmann; Burkard Simma; Thomas Frischer; Saffron A G Willis-Owen; Kenny C C Wong; Thomas Illig; Christian Vogelberg; Stephan K Weiland; Erika von Mutius; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Martin Farrall; Ivo G Gut; G Mark Lathrop; William O C Cookson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  28 in total

1.  Epigenetic differences in normal colon mucosa of cancer patients suggest altered dietary metabolic pathways.

Authors:  Matthew L Silviera; Brian P Smith; Jasmine Powell; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 2.  Tilting at quixotic trait loci (QTL): an evolutionary perspective on genetic causation.

Authors:  Kenneth M Weiss
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Meta-analysis of 20 genome-wide linkage studies evidenced new regions linked to asthma and atopy.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Bouzigon; Paola Forabosco; Gerard H Koppelman; William O C M Cookson; Marie-Hélène Dizier; David L Duffy; David M Evans; Manuel A R Ferreira; Juha Kere; Tarja Laitinen; Giovanni Malerba; Deborah A Meyers; Miriam Moffatt; Nicholas G Martin; Mandy Y Ng; Pier Franco Pignatti; Mathias Wjst; Francine Kauffmann; Florence Demenais; Cathryn M Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage scans for renal function traits.

Authors:  Madhumathi Rao; Amy K Mottl; Shelley A Cole; Jason G Umans; Barry I Freedman; Donald W Bowden; Carl D Langefeld; Caroline S Fox; Qiong Yang; Adrienne Cupples; Sudha K Iyengar; Steven C Hunt; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 5.  The genetics of asthma and allergic disease: a 21st century perspective.

Authors:  Carole Ober; Tsung-Chieh Yao
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  BAL Cell Gene Expression in Severe Asthma Reveals Mechanisms of Severe Disease and Influences of Medications.

Authors:  Nathaniel Weathington; Michael E O'Brien; Josiah Radder; Thomas C Whisenant; Eugene R Bleecker; William W Busse; Serpil C Erzurum; Benjamin Gaston; Annette T Hastie; Nizar N Jarjour; Deborah A Meyers; Jadranka Milosevic; Wendy C Moore; John R Tedrow; John B Trudeau; Hesper P Wong; Wei Wu; Naftali Kaminski; Sally E Wenzel; Brian D Modena
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Explaining inter-individual variability in phenotype: is epigenetics up to the challenge?

Authors:  Nahid Turan; Sunita Katari; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Asthma susceptible genes in Chinese population: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobo Li; Yonggang Zhang; Jie Zhang; Yuling Xiao; Jin Huang; Can Tian; Chao He; Yao Deng; Yingying Yang; Hong Fan
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-09-24

9.  Influence of MILR1 promoter polymorphism on expression levels and the phenotype of atopy.

Authors:  Kentaro Nanatsue; Takahiro Ninomiya; Mio Tsuchiya; Satoko Tahara-Hanaoka; Akira Shibuya; Hironori Masuko; Toru Sakamoto; Nobuyuki Hizawa; Tadao Arinami; Emiko Noguchi
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  A pooling-based genome-wide analysis identifies new potential candidate genes for atopy in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS).

Authors:  Francesc Castro-Giner; Mariona Bustamante; Juan Ramon González; Manolis Kogevinas; Deborah Jarvis; Joachim Heinrich; Josep-Maria Antó; Matthias Wjst; Xavier Estivill; Rafael de Cid
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.