Literature DB >> 18407584

Modeling heaping in self-reported cigarette counts.

Hao Wang1, Daniel F Heitjan.   

Abstract

In studies of smoking behavior, some subjects report exact cigarette counts, whereas others report rounded-off counts, particularly multiples of 20, 10 or 5. This form of data reporting error, known as heaping, can bias the estimation of parameters of interest such as mean cigarette consumption. We present a model to describe heaped count data from a randomized trial of bupropion treatment for smoking cessation. The model posits that the reported cigarette count is a deterministic function of an underlying precise cigarette count variable and a heaping behavior variable, both of which are at best partially observed. To account for an excess of zeros, as would likely occur in a smoking cessation study where some subjects successfully quit, we model the underlying count variable with zero-inflated count distributions. We study the sensitivity of the inference on smoking cessation by fitting various models that either do or do not account for heaping and zero inflation, comparing the models by means of Bayes factors. Our results suggest that sufficiently rich models for both the underlying distribution and the heaping behavior are indispensable to obtaining a good fit with heaped smoking data. The analyses moreover reveal that bupropion has a significant effect on the fraction abstinent, but not on mean cigarette consumption among the non-abstinent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18407584      PMCID: PMC2684113          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

1.  A score test for testing a zero-inflated Poisson regression model against zero-inflated negative binomial alternatives.

Authors:  M Ridout; J Hinde; C G Demétrio
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.

Authors:  David A Savitz; James W Terry; Nancy Dole; John M Thorp; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Quality of age data in patients from developing countries.

Authors:  Srdjan Denic; Falah Khatib; Hussein Saadi
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  S de Lusignan; J Belsey; N Hague; B Dzregah
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Modelling digit preference in fecundability studies.

Authors:  M S Ridout; B J Morgan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Proportional hazards models for current status data: application to the study of differentials in age at weaning in Pakistan.

Authors:  I D Diamond; J W McDonald; I H Shah
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1986-11

7.  Assessment of digit preference in self-reported year at menopause: choice of an appropriate reference distribution.

Authors:  Sybil L Crawford; Catherine B Johannes; Rebecca K Stellato
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.

Authors:  S Thavarajah; W B White; G A Mansoor
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Digit preference bias in the recording of emergency department times.

Authors:  Thomas E Locker; Suzanne M Mason
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.799

10.  Gender differences in smoking cessation in a placebo-controlled trial of bupropion with behavioral counseling.

Authors:  Bradley N Collins; E Paul Wileyto; Freda Patterson; Margaret Rukstalis; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Vyga Kaufmann; Angela Pinto; Larry Hawk; Raymond Niaura; Leonard H Epstein; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  17 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of daily smoking status in smoking cessation clinical trials.

Authors:  Yimei Li; E Paul Wileyto; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  A method comparison study of timeline followback and ecological momentary assessment of daily cigarette consumption.

Authors:  Sandra D Griffith; Saul Shiffman; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Model-based imputation of latent cigarette counts using data from a calibration study.

Authors:  Sandra D Griffith; Saul Shiffman; Yimei Li; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Accounting for heaping in retrospectively reported event data - a mixture-model approach.

Authors:  Haim Y Bar; Dean R Lillard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Modeling Criminal Careers as Departures from a Unimodal Population Age-Crime Curve: The Case of Marijuana Use.

Authors:  Donatello Telesca; Elena A Erosheva; Derek A Kreager; Ross L Matsueda
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Zero-inflated count models for longitudinal measurements with heterogeneous random effects.

Authors:  Huirong Zhu; Sheng Luo; Stacia M DeSantis
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  EVALUATING COSTS WITH UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT EFFECT.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Handorf; Justin E Bekelman; Daniel F Heitjan; Nandita Mitra
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Truth and Memory: Linking Instantaneous and Retrospective Self-Reported Cigarette Consumption.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Saul Shiffman; Sandra D Griffith; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Joint modeling of longitudinal zero-inflated count and time-to-event data: A Bayesian perspective.

Authors:  Huirong Zhu; Stacia M DeSantis; Sheng Luo
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Rounding behavior in the reporting of headache frequency complicates headache chronification research.

Authors:  Timothy T Houle; Dana P Turner; Thomas A Houle; Todd A Smitherman; Vincent Martin; Donald B Penzien; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.