Literature DB >> 16525239

Digit preference bias in the recording of emergency department times.

Thomas E Locker1, Suzanne M Mason.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Digit preference bias has previously been described in a number of different clinical settings. The paper aimed to assess whether digit preference bias affects the recording of the time patients arrive and leave emergency departments.
METHOD: An observational study of 137 emergency departments in England and Wales was conducted. Each department was asked to submit details of the time of arrival and time of departure from the emergency department for each patient attending during April 2004. In addition, interviews with the lead clinician were undertaken to determine the method used to record the time of departure. The degree of digit preference bias was assessed using a modification of Whipple's index.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three (86.9%) departments submitted data detailing 648,203 emergency department episodes. 114,875 (18.0%) episodes had a recorded minute of departure of '0' or '30', with a further 281,890 (44.1%) having other values with a terminal digit of '0' or '5'. The mean modified Whipple's index for time of departure was 316.9 (range 70.9-484.4). Linear regression demonstrates a small but significant inverse relationship between the modified Whipple's index and the mean total time in department (b = -0.05, 95% CIs -0.09 to -0.0004, P = 0.048).
CONCLUSION: Some departments show considerable digit preference bias in the recording of time of departure from the emergency department. Such bias may cause difficulty in assessing changes in the performance of departments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16525239     DOI: 10.1097/01.mej.0000195677.23780.fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of minute distribution frequency for anesthesia start and end times from an anesthesia information management system and paper records.

Authors:  Michael Phelps; Asad Latif; Robert Thomsen; Martin Slodzinski; Rahul Raghavan; Sharon Leigh Paul; Jerry Stonemetz
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Childhood obesity: are we all speaking the same language?

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Modeling heaping in self-reported cigarette counts.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Quality of age data in the Sierra Leone Ebola database.

Authors:  Lindsay Shively Womack; Charles Alpren; Frederick Martineau; Amara Jambai; Tushar Singh; Reinhard Kaiser; John Terrell Redd
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 5.  Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases-A narrative review.

Authors:  Andrew J Goodwin; Danny Eytan; William Dixon; Sebastian D Goodfellow; Zakary Doherty; Robert W Greer; Alistair McEwan; Mark Tracy; Peter C Laussen; Azadeh Assadi; Mjaye Mazwi
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Gaming New Zealand's Emergency Department Target: How and Why Did It Vary Over Time and Between Organisations?

Authors:  Tim Tenbensel; Peter Jones; Linda Maree Chalmers; Shanthi Ameratunga; Peter Carswell
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.