Literature DB >> 15284321

Quality of age data in patients from developing countries.

Srdjan Denic1, Falah Khatib, Hussein Saadi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age misreporting is common in demographic studies but the prevalence and magnitude of age misreporting in clinical cohorts is unknown. We analysed single-year age distribution and terminal digit preference in cancer patients from developing countries.
METHOD: Age distribution was analysed by plotting a single-year age of 3874 cancer patients from 72 different countries, mainly from the Indian subcontinent and the Middle East, who resided in the UAE at the time of cancer diagnosis. Preference for age ending with digits '0' and '5' was evaluated using Whipple's index (WI), which has value 100 in cohorts without preference. Preference for all 10 terminal digits was expressed as the difference between the found and expected frequencies using Myers blended method and was graphed.
RESULTS: Age data quality was low in cancer patients from the Indian subcontinent (WI = 177) and Middle Eastern countries (WI = 113-204). Females of all nationalities supplied better quality of age data (lower WI) than males. Preference for age ending with digits '0' and '5' was found in all populations except the UAE male citizens who did not show preference for terminal digit '0'.
CONCLUSION: Age data quality in this cohort of patients from developing countries was low. Preference for age ending with numbers '0' and '5' is common. In studies conducted in developing countries, age data quality should be analysed as it may bias results and weaken the power of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284321     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  14 in total

1.  Are anesthesia start and end times randomly distributed? The influence of electronic records.

Authors:  Litisha G Deal; Michael E Nyland; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Patrick Tighe
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 9.452

Review 2.  Subdividing the age group of 85 years and older to improve US disease reporting.

Authors:  Francis P Boscoe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Studying disability trends in aging populations.

Authors:  Danan Gu; Rosa Gomez-Redondo; Matthew E Dupre
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2015-03

4.  An electronic, smart lighter to measure cigarette smoking: A pilot study to assess feasibility and initial validity.

Authors:  Rachel L Tomko; Erin A McClure; Patrick A Cato; Julie B Wang; Matthew J Carpenter; Joshua L Karelitz; Brett Froeliger; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Age heaping and accuracy of age data collected during a community survey in the yavatmal district, maharashtra.

Authors:  Geeta S Pardeshi
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2010-07

6.  Measurement of smoking behavior: Comparison of self-reports, returned cigarette butts, and toxicant levels.

Authors:  Melissa D Blank; Alison B Breland; Paul T Enlow; Christina Duncan; Aaron Metzger; Caroline O Cobb
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  How many cigarettes did you smoke? Assessing cigarette consumption by global report, Time-Line Follow-Back, and ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Modeling heaping in self-reported cigarette counts.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The Visual Analog rating Scale of health-related quality of life: an examination of end-digit preferences.

Authors:  Amir Shmueli
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Using two on-going HIV studies to obtain clinical data from before, during and after pregnancy for HIV-positive women.

Authors:  Susie E Huntington; Loveleen K Bansi; Claire Thorne; Jane Anderson; Marie-Louise Newell; Graham P Taylor; Deenan Pillay; Teresa Hill; Pat A Tookey; Caroline A Sabin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.