Literature DB >> 1786326

Modelling digit preference in fecundability studies.

M S Ridout1, B J Morgan.   

Abstract

Retrospective studies of fecundability, in which women are asked how many cycles they required to become pregnant, are often affected by problems of digit preference. A probability model for such digit preference is proposed in which misreporting favours 6 or 12 (and possibly also 3) cycles. It is assumed that in the absence of misreporting the number of cycles follows a beta-geometric distribution. The model is applied to two data sets, with clear-cut results: The inclusion of additional parameters to model the misreporting can lead to substantial improvements in fit, but causes little change to the estimated parameters of the underlying beta-geometric distribution. In some cases misreporting parameters may be regarded as nuisance parameters, while in others they may be of interest. We have found estimates of these parameters to vary between different categories of women in an interpretable manner. The models may also be used to estimate the percentage of couples in any study that misreport their conception waiting time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Bias; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage--statistics; Data Analysis; Error Sources; Family Planning; Fecundability; Fecundity; Measurement; Menstrual Cycle; Menstruation; Models, Theoretical; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Smoking; Statistical Regression

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1786326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; David E Kanouse; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Semiparametric modeling of grouped current duration data with preferential reporting.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Persistent environmental pollutants and couple fecundity: an overview.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Truth and Memory: Linking Instantaneous and Retrospective Self-Reported Cigarette Consumption.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Saul Shiffman; Sandra D Griffith; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Modeling heaping in self-reported cigarette counts.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Maternal Recall Error in Retrospectively Reported Time-to-Pregnancy: an Assessment and Bias Analysis.

Authors:  Rose G Radin; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik T Sorensen; Anders H Riis; Matthew P Fox; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 7.  Methodologic and statistical approaches to studying human fertility and environmental exposure.

Authors:  Candace Tingen; Joseph B Stanford; David B Dunson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.