Literature DB >> 15037875

End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.

S de Lusignan1, J Belsey, N Hague, B Dzregah.   

Abstract

End-digit preference describes the disproportionate selection of specific end digits. The rounding of figures might lead to either an under- or over-recording of blood pressure (BP) and a lack of accuracy and reliability in treatment decisions. A total of 85 000 BP values taken from computerised general practice records of ischaemic heart disease patients in England between 2001 and 2003 were examined. Zero preference accounts for 64% of systolic and 59% of diastolic readings, compared with an expected frequency of 10% (P<0.000001). Even numbers are more frequently seen than odd numbers. In all, 64% of nonzero systolic recordings and 65% of diastolic recordings ended in even numbers, compared with expected proportions of 44% (P<0.0001). Among the nonzero even numbers, eight is the most frequently observed: 28% of systolic and 31% of diastolic recordings compared with an expected proportion of 25% (P<0.0001). Among the five nonzero odd numbers, five is the most frequently observed end digit, representing 59% systolic and 62% of diastolic compared with an expected level of 20% (P<0.00001). English general practice displays marked end-digit preference. This is strongly for the end-digit zero. However, there is more use of other end-digits, notably 8 and 5. This bias potentially carries important treatment consequences for this high-risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15037875     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  13 in total

1.  Are anesthesia start and end times randomly distributed? The influence of electronic records.

Authors:  Litisha G Deal; Michael E Nyland; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Patrick Tighe
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Relations of body weight status in early adulthood and weight changes until middle age with hypertension in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Long Zhou; Ying Li; Min Guo; Yangfeng Wu; Liancheng Zhao
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  An example of end-digit preference in physiotherapy practice.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Amy V Wainwright; Deborah M Kennedy
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Modeling heaping in self-reported cigarette counts.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.

Authors:  Nicole Gray Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The Visual Analog rating Scale of health-related quality of life: an examination of end-digit preferences.

Authors:  Amir Shmueli
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  The QICKD study protocol: a cluster randomised trial to compare quality improvement interventions to lower systolic BP in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care.

Authors:  Simon de Lusignan; Hugh Gallagher; Tom Chan; Nicki Thomas; Jeremy van Vlymen; Michael Nation; Neerja Jain; Aumran Tahir; Elizabeth du Bois; Iain Crinson; Nigel Hague; Fiona Reid; Kevin Harris
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value: implication for hypertension screening.

Authors:  Theophile Niyonsenga; Alain Vanasse; Josiane Courteau; Lyne Cloutier
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Manual or automated sphygmomanometer? A historical cohort to quantify measurement bias in blood pressure recording.

Authors:  Arash A Nargesi; Zaniar Ghazizadeh; Mehrdad Larry; Afsaneh Morteza; Firuzeh Heidari; Firuzeh Asgarani; Alireza Esteghamati; Kazem Mohammad; Manouchehr Nakhjavani
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  End-digits preference for self-reported height depends on language.

Authors:  Matthias Bopp; David Faeh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.