Literature DB >> 12501080

Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.

David A Savitz1, James W Terry, Nancy Dole, John M Thorp, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Amy H Herring.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of algorithms for the assignment of gestational age with the use of the last menstrual period and early ultrasound information. STUDY
DESIGN: Gestational age estimates that are based on last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, or their combination were compared among women who attended prenatal care clinics in central North Carolina (n = 3655) by an evaluation of digit preference in the last menstrual period dates and a comparison of mean gestational age, preterm and postterm categories with the use of kappa statistics, difference between actual and expected delivery date, and birth weight among subgroups with discrepant assignments.
RESULTS: Last menstrual period reports show digit preference, assign gestation 2.8 days longer on average than ultrasound scanning, yield substantially more postterm births (12.1% vs 3.4%), and predict delivery among term births less accurately. Misclassification of births as postterm was more common in younger women, those of nonoptimal prepregnancy body weight, cigarette smokers, and women who reported last menstrual period using preferred dates of the month.
CONCLUSION: Last menstrual period estimates of the duration of gestation are subject to both random error and a systematic tendency to overstate the duration of gestation, most likely because of delayed ovulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12501080     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  96 in total

1.  Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan.

Authors:  Imtiaz Jehan; Shahida Zaidi; Sameera Rizvi; Naushaba Mobeen; Elizabeth M McClure; Breda Munoz; Omrana Pasha; Linda L Wright; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Childhood hardship, maternal smoking, and birth outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emily W Harville; Renée Boynton-Jarrett; Chris Power; Elina Hyppönen
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-06

3.  The associations of parental under-education and unemployment on the risk of preterm birth: 2003 Korean National Birth Registration database.

Authors:  Seung Han Shin; Hyung-tak Lim; Hyun-young Park; Sang Min Park; Han-suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Perinatal outcomes for Asian, Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander mothers of single and multiple race/ethnicity: California and Hawaii, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Ashley H Schempf; Pauline Mendola; Brady E Hamilton; Donald K Hayes; Diane M Makuc
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Comparison of two measures of gestational age among low income births. The potential impact on health studies, New York, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria Lazariu; Christopher F Davis; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

6.  Prepregnancy overweight and obesity are associated with impaired child neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Marie Widen; Linda Gross Kahn; Piera Cirillo; Barbara Cohn; Katrina Lynn Kezios; Pam Factor-Litvak
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Maternal and obstetric complications of pregnancy are associated with increasing gestational age at term.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Naomi E Stotland; A Eugene Washington; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Assessment of weight changes during and after pregnancy: practical approaches.

Authors:  Amanda R Amorim; Yvonne Linné; Gilberto Kac; Paulo M Lourenço
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Modeling the pediatric paradox: birth weight by gestational age.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Howard Stratton
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2008

10.  Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on stillbirth and neonatal mortality.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Olga Basso
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.