Literature DB >> 18404292

Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.

Maria K Kaseta1, Louis E DeFrate, Brian L Charnock, Robert T Sullivan, William E Garrett.   

Abstract

Grafts placed too anteriorly on the femur are reportedly a common cause of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Some studies suggest more anatomic femoral tunnel placement improves kinematics. The ability of the transtibial technique and a tibial tunnel-independent technique (placed transfemorally outside-in) to place the guide pin near the center of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament was compared in 12 cadavers. After arthroscopic placement of the guide pins, the femur was dissected and the three-dimensional geometry of the femur, anterior cruciate ligament footprint, and positions of each guide pin were measured. The transtibial guide-pin placement was 7.9 +/- 2.2 mm from the center of the footprint (near its anterior border), whereas the independent technique positioned the guide pin 1.9 +/- 1.0 mm from the center. The center of the footprint was within 2 mm of an anteroposterior line through the most posterior border of the femoral cartilage in the notch and a proximodistal line through the proximal margin of the cartilage at the capsular reflection. More accurate placement of the femoral tunnel might reduce the incidence of graft failure and might reduce long-term degeneration observed after reconstruction although both would require clinical confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404292      PMCID: PMC2384035          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0238-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  54 in total

1.  Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results.

Authors:  C Sommer; N F Friederich; W Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis.

Authors:  F G Girgis; J L Marshall; A Monajem
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs.

Authors:  S Ristanis; G Giakas; C D Papageorgiou; T Moraiti; N Stergiou; A D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons.

Authors:  N Adachi; M Ochi; Y Uchio; J Iwasa; M Kuriwaka; Y Ito
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

5.  Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Nadine Diermann; Tobias Schumacher; Steffen Schanz; Freddie H Fu; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; Kilian Friedrich; Tobias Gotterbarm; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Jason M Scopp; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  L S Lohmander; A Ostenberg; M Englund; H Roos
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10

9.  Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging.

Authors:  Martin Charles Logan; Andrew Williams; Jonathon Lavelle; Wady Gedroyc; Michael Freeman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: single bundle versus anatomical double bundle techniques.

Authors:  Sandra Umeda Sasaki; Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque; César Augusto Martins Pereira; Guilherme Simões Gouveia; Júlio César Rodrigues Vilela; Fábio de Lima Alcarás
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  57 in total

1.  Measuring the anterior cruciate ligament's footprints by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yung Han; David Kurzencwyg; Adam Hart; Tom Powell; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first?

Authors:  Shuji Taketomi; Takumi Nakagawa; Hideki Takeda; Kohei Nakajima; Shuichi Nakayama; Atsushi Fukai; Jinso Hirota; Yoshinori Kachi; Hirotaka Kawano; Toshiki Miura; Naoshi Fukui; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Brian Forsythe; Andrew K Wong; Scott Tashman; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint.

Authors:  Hemanth R Gadikota; Jae Ang Sim; Ali Hosseini; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  M Otani; M Nozaki; M Kobayashi; H Goto; K Tawada; Y Waguri-Nagaya; H Okamoto; H Iguchi; N Watanabe; T Otsuka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Clinico-radiological outcomes following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the TransLateral, all-inside technique.

Authors:  Rohi Shah; Sriram Srinivasan; Yosef Hamed; Dipen K Menon
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09-10

7.  Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Michael Elias Hantes; Vasilios C Zachos; Athanasios Liantsis; Aaron Venouziou; Apostolos H Karantanas; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The effects of femoral graft placement on cartilage thickness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Long-term results after reconstruction of the ACL with hamstrings autograft and transtibial femoral drilling.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Torbjørn Strand; Cornelia Fischer-Bredenbeck; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.