Literature DB >> 15150047

Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging.

Martin Charles Logan1, Andrew Williams, Jonathon Lavelle, Wady Gedroyc, Michael Freeman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is to reduce excess joint laxity, hoping to restore normal tibiofemoral kinematics and therefore improve joint stability. It remains unclear if successful ACL reconstruction restores normal tibiofemoral kinematics and whether it is this that is associated with a good result. STUDY: Case series.
PURPOSE: To assess the kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee using open-access MRI.
METHODS: Tibiofemoral motion was assessed using open-access MRI, weightbearing through the arc of flexion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees in 10 patients with isolated reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (hamstring autograft) in one knee and a normal contralateral knee. Midmedial and midlateral sagittal images were analyzed in all positions of flexion in both knees to assess the tibiofemoral relationship. Sagittal laxity was also assessed by performing the Lachman test while the knees were scanned dynamically using open-access MRI.
RESULTS: The amount of excursion between the tibial and femoral joint surfaces was similar between the normal and reconstructed knees, but the relationship of tibia to femur was always different for each position of knee flexion assessed-the lateral tibia being about 5 mm more anterior in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. This anterior tibial position is statistically significantly different at 0 degrees (P <.0006), 20 degrees (P =.0004), 45 degrees (P =.002), and 90 degrees of flexion (P <.006). Anteroposterior laxity was similar between normal and anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees.
CONCLUSION: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces sagittal laxity to within normal limits but does not restore normal tibiofemoral kinematics despite a successful outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15150047     DOI: 10.1177/0363546503261702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  41 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Yuichi Hoshino; Kristian Samuelsson; Paulo Araujo; Volker Musahl; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: drilling a femoral posterolateral tunnel cannot be accomplished using an over-the-top step-off drill guide.

Authors:  Sven Behrendt; Jens Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Abnormal tibial position is correlated to early degenerative changes one year following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Musa Zaid; Drew Lansdown; Favian Su; Valentina Pedoia; Lauren Tufts; Sarah Rizzo; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  The functions of the fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior drawer, rotational laxity and the pivot shift.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Kinematic study following double-bundle, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Bong Hyun Bae; Sang Jin Park; Taek Rim Yoon; Sang Gwon Cho; Jae Joon Lee; Myung Sun Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Maria K Kaseta; Louis E DeFrate; Brian L Charnock; Robert T Sullivan; William E Garrett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does a lateral plasty control coupled translation during antero-posterior stress in single-bundle ACL reconstruction? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Simone Bignozzi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Sandra Martelli; Francesco Iacono; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Rollback of the femoral condyle in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Kenji Shirakura; Takashi Horaguchi; Yusuke Morimoto; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Ligament Injury, Reconstruction and Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Michael J Hulstyn; Heidi L Oksendahl; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Curr Opin Orthop       Date:  2005-10

10.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.