Literature DB >> 15007318

The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Jason M Scopp1, Louis E Jasper, Stephen M Belkoff, Claude T Moorman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the high long-term success rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, 8% of patients undergoing this primary procedure have recurrent disability and graft failure. Nonanatomic tunnel positioning (primarily of the femoral tunnel) accounts for most of all technical failures. We hypothesized that reconstructions that closely recreate the oblique femoral attachment of the ACL would result in more normal knee rotational stability than more vertical reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether obliquity of the femoral tunnel in the coronal (frontal) plane has an effect on rotational constraint after ACL reconstruction, as measured by anterior tibial translation, external rotation, and internal rotation. TYPE OF STUDY: Ex vivo biomechanical study.
METHODS: Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver knees were alternately assigned to a standard or an oblique tunnel position reconstruction. Each knee was tested at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion on a materials testing machine in ACL-intact, ACL-sectioned, and ACL-reconstructed states. A 100-N load was applied at a rate of 10 N/second, and anterior tibial translation was measured. Then 6.5 Nm of torque were applied, and external tibial rotation and internal tibial rotation were measured. The effects of tunnel placement and ligament condition were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance. Significance was set at P < or =.05 (Tukey's test).
RESULTS: At 30 degrees of flexion, internal tibial rotation in oblique reconstruction was restored to intact values and was significantly less than the internal tibial rotation values in standard reconstruction. Internal tibial rotation in standard reconstruction was significantly greater than intact values. No significant differences were found between standard and oblique tunnel reconstructions and the respective intact values for the remaining internal tibial rotation and all external tibial rotation tests, regardless of flexion angle.
CONCLUSIONS: In our biomechanical model, ACL reconstructions using oblique femoral tunnels restored normal knee kinematics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007318     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  81 in total

1.  A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Pedro Debieux; Biju Benjamin; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Britta L Swanson; Kyle E Swanson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Measuring the anterior cruciate ligament's footprints by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yung Han; David Kurzencwyg; Adam Hart; Tom Powell; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Placement of femoral tunnel between the AM and PL bundles using a transtibial technique in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alcindo Silva; Ricardo Sampaio; Elisabete Pinto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint.

Authors:  Hemanth R Gadikota; Jae Ang Sim; Ali Hosseini; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Knee stability, athletic performance and sport-specific tasks in non-professional soccer players after ACL reconstruction: comparing trans-tibial and antero-medial portal techniques.

Authors:  Cosimo Tudisco; Salvatore Bisicchia; Andrea Cosentino; Federica Chiozzi; Massimo Piva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

7.  Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  J P van der List; H A Zuiderbaan; D H Nawabi; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the two-incision technique.

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Elyazid Mouhsine; Pierre Chambat; Olivier Siegrist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment.

Authors:  M A Kessler; H Behrend; S Henz; G Stutz; A Rukavina; M S Kuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Francisco Lajara; Gonzalo Samitier; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.