Literature DB >> 18193194

Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes.

Nikolaus A Streich1, Kilian Friedrich, Tobias Gotterbarm, Holger Schmitt.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in double-bundle technique is advocated to more closely restore the anatomy and function of the native ligament than conventional single-bundle technique. But up to now there are only a few clinical investigations comparing both techniques in a prospective manner. We hypothesized that double-bundle ACL reconstruction reveals superior clinical and subjective results compared to single-bundle technique in a high-demand collective. A total of 50 male patients (mean age 29.4 years) were prospectively randomized consecutively into one of the two reconstruction techniques. Group 1 (SB) underwent a 4-stranded single-bundle reconstruction with a ST graft in femoral position at 10:00 and 02:00 o'clock, respectively. In group 2 (DB), reconstruction was performed by using a 2-stranded ST graft with double-bundle, four tunnel technique. Before surgery and at a 2 year follow-up (range 23-25 months) patients were evaluated by the same blinded observer. There was no significant difference in the side-to-side anterior laxity-measurement with the KT-1000 between both groups. As evaluated by the pivot shift, no significant correlation could be noted (Fisher exact test P = 0.098) between rotational stability and any of the both reconstruction techniques. However, the anterior and rotational stability improved significantly at 2-year follow-up compared to preoperatively (P = 0.003) in both groups. The statistical analysis showed a significant increase for the IKDC (subjective, objective) and the Lysholm Score at final follow-up among each single technique, while we found no significant difference between the two reconstruction methods. On the basis of our investigation, we conclude that reconstruction of the ACL by a double-bundle ST graft with an extracortical anchorage can achieve excellent clinical results. But in contrast to our initial hypothesis, we could not quote any significant advantages by creating two independent bundles. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in conventional single-bundle technique with a more horizontal femoral tunnel placement obtains comparable clinical results in the present high-demand collective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18193194     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0480-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  38 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a double bundle.

Authors:  K Hara; T Kubo; T Suginoshita; C Shimizu; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior-posterior laxity patterns.

Authors:  T Dionyssios Zavras; Amos Race; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Eiji Kondo; Hiroki Ichiyama; Nobuto Kitamura; Yoshie Tanabe; Harukazu Tohyama; Akio Minami
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Anthony M Buoncristiani; Fotios P Tjoumakaris; James S Starman; Mario Ferretti; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  Gene R Barrett; Frank K Noojin; Charles W Hartzog; Carrie R Nash
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  65 in total

1.  Rotatory laxity evaluation of the knee using modified Slocum's test in open magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Toshiaki Izawa; Shuichi Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Manraj Chahal; Michael N Tran; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Double-bundle reconstruction results in superior clinical outcome than single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Ren-Kuan Tang; Peng Zhao; Shi-Sheng Zhu; Yong-Guo Li; Jian-Bo Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system.

Authors:  Daisuke Araki; Ryosuke Kuroda; Seiji Kubo; Norifumi Fujita; Katsumasa Tei; Koji Nishimoto; Yuichi Hoshino; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Maria K Kaseta; Louis E DeFrate; Brian L Charnock; Robert T Sullivan; William E Garrett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Static rotational and sagittal knee laxity measurements after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  O Lorbach; M Kieb; P Brogard; S Maas; D Pape; R Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Tunnel location in transparent 3-dimensional CT in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the trans-tibial tunnel technique.

Authors:  Masayuki Inoue; Shinichi Tokuyasu; Sadatoshi Kuwahara; Nobutoshi Yasojima; Yasuhiko Kasahara; Eiji Kondo; Shin Onodere; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of using one hamstrings tendon for ACL reconstruction: a human cadaveric study.

Authors:  Giovanni Zamarra; Matthew B Fisher; Savio L-Y Woo; Giuliano Cerulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  Vivek Machhindra Morey; Hira Lal Nag; Buddhadev Chowdhury; Chaitanya Dev Pannu; Sanjay Meena; Kiran Kumar; Aravindh Palaniswamy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.