Literature DB >> 18989731

Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Eiichi Tsuda1, Yasuyuki Ishibashi, Akira Fukuda, Harehiko Tsukada, Satoshi Toh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Patellar tendon autografts are not suitable for multibundle ACL reconstruction, a procedure that reportedly enhances postoperative knee stability. Biomechanical studies recommend lateral placement of the femoral tunnel for single-bundle reconstruction to improve postoperative knee kinematics. We asked whether a lateralized single-bundle patellar tendon graft (LSBP) would provide good short-term results of ACL reconstruction comparable to double-bundle hamstring tendon grafts (DBH). We prospectively followed 144 patients with unilateral ACL rupture treated with either LSBP or DBH in a nonrandomized fashion. Twenty-four female and 31 male patients with LSBP and 44 female and 26 male patients with DBH were followed for a minimum of 24 months (average, 38 months; range, 24-56 months). The patients with LSBP recovered knee extension better at 1 month compared with the patients with DBH, but extension was similar after 3 months. We observed no differences in the side-to-side difference of KT1000 measurement, pivot shift test, or anterior drawer test between LSBP and DBH. Although better recovery of hamstring strength in LSBP and better recovery of quadriceps strength in DBH were observed in the early postoperative period, these differences disappeared after 12 months. There was no difference in International Knee Documentation Committee objective evaluation between LSBP and DBH at the final followup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989731      PMCID: PMC2650066          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0604-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  57 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement.

Authors:  Yuji Yamamoto; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Savio L-Y Woo; Andrew H Van Scyoc; Yoshiyuki Takakura; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery.

Authors:  Lee Herrington; Charlotte Wrapson; Martyn Matthews; Helen Matthews
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Overlapping systematic reviews of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: why are they different?

Authors:  Rudolf W Poolman; Jihad A K Abouali; Henry J Conter; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Hiroki Ichiyama; Eiji Kondo; Shin Miyatake; Masayuki Inoue; Yoshie Tanabe
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Intraoperative biomechanical evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system: comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  ACL reconstruction: semitendinosus tendon is the graft of choice.

Authors:  T D Rosenberg; K T Deffner
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques.

Authors:  Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Young-Jin Ju; Kenji Hara; Akimoto Nimura; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  16 in total

1.  Single-bundle versus double-bundle ACL reconstructions in isolation and in conjunction with extra-articular iliotibial band tenodesis.

Authors:  Paul D Butler; Chloe J Mellecker; M James Rudert; John P Albright
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Beibei Gu; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-18

3.  Single-bundle modified patellar tendon versus double-bundle tibialis anterior allograft ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Xiao Jing Wang; Chun Juan Wu; Jian Hui Cao; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The evolution of primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction and recovery of early post-operative range of motion.

Authors:  Verena M Schreiber; Susan S Jordan; Gregory A Bonci; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  In vitro and intraoperative laxities after single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Hemanth R Gadikota; Jong Keun Seon; Chih-Hui Chen; Jia-Lin Wu; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  A matched pairs comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, clinical results and manual laxity testing.

Authors:  R Siebold; T P Branch; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Danilo Bruni; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Nicola Lopomo; Simone Bignozzi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Thavatchai Tiamklang; Sermsak Sumanont; Thanit Foocharoen; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 10.  Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Haukur Björnsson; Neel Desai; Volker Musahl; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Mohit Bhandari; Freddie Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.