Literature DB >> 11178754

Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case for the selective operative cholangiogram.

L L Snow1, L S Weinstein, J K Hannon, D R Lane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is still some controversy over whether to use laparoscopic operative cholangiograms routinely (RLOC) or selectively (SLOC). Due to their high cost as well as other issues, in March 1997 we converted from RLOC to SLOC. The purpose of this study was to validate that decision.
METHODS: The results of 2043 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) were compiled and analyzed. The results of RLOC in 1556 patients undergoing LC from March 1990 through February 1997 were compared to the results of SLOC in 16 patients undergoing LC from March 1989 through February 1990 and 471 patients undergoing LC from March 1997 through December 1998. The literature was reviewed and data were compiled. Reasons that are typically given for operative cholangiograms (OC) were collected and scrutinized. Finally, cost surveys for RLOC and related procedures were obtained.
RESULTS: Overall, laparoscopic operative cholangiogram (LOC) was attempted in 1661 patients and was successful in 1656 cases (99.7%). Bile duct stones (BDS) were evident in 166 patients. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) was attempted in all cases. None were referred for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the RLOC group, evidence of BDS was observed in 136 patients (9%). Forty-two were unsuspected (2.8%) and five were false positive (0.3%). In a collection of other RLOC studies, the average rate of unsuspected BDS was 2.9%, while the average rate of false positive cholangiograms was 1.6%. In the SLOC group, LOC was indicated in 139 of 487 patients (28.6%). None of the patients who did not have a LOC developed symptomatic residual BDS in < or = 11 years of follow-up. In a large collection of other SLOC studies, the rate of symptomatic residual BDS was 0.3%. A cost survey in February 1997 revealed that the average minimum global charge (MGC) for an OC was $1283.21; for a transcystic duct LBDE it was $1055.10, and for a transcholedochal LBDE it was $3263.61 [corrected]. The MGC for an ERCP with papillotomy was $4303.00. Thus, to avoid one patient with symptomatic residual BDS, 354 unnecessary procedures (333 RLOC, 18 LBDE, and three postoperative ERCP) costing $473,927.52 would be performed. There were no false negatives, bile duct injuries, or other complications attributable to RLOC or SLOC.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased morbidity and cost of RLOC to avoid symptomatic residual BDS is not justified. All other reasons given for RLOC are either flawed or indicate that the procedure can be safely employed selectively. SLOC is an effective method of verifying suspected BDS and is safer and less expensive than RLOC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11178754     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  Selective use of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J L Grogono; W G Woods
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Modern radiology in the operating room.

Authors:  G Berci; R Steckel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-10

3.  Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1050 cases later.

Authors:  C R Voyles; D L Sanders; R Hogan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; A Qureshi; P Burke; A Leahy; N Brindley; H Osborne; B Lane; P Broe; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Potential hazards of intraoperative cholangiography in patients with infected bile.

Authors:  N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Intraoperative cholangiography is not essential to avoid duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J W Lorimer; R J Fairfull-Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  The case against routine operative cholangiography.

Authors:  A Gerber; M K Apt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Selective operative cholangiography. Appropriate management for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B L Robinson; J H Donohue; S Gunes; G B Thompson; C S Grant; M G Sarr; M B Farnell; J A van Heerden
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-06
View more
  18 in total

1.  Prospective study of scoring system in selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Sun; Xiao-Yan Cai; Jun-Da Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mu; Jin-Min Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael R Cox; Joel P O Budge; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Nickkholgh; S Soltaniyekta; H Kalbasi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic treatment for unsuspected common bile duct stones by transcystic sphincter of Oddi pneumatic balloon dilation and pressure-washing technique.

Authors:  Luigi Masoni; Francesco Saverio Mari; Vincenzo Pietropaolo; Maurizio Onorato; Massimo Meucci; Antonio Brescia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Endoscopic Ultrasonograpy for Choledocholithiasis and Biliary Malignancy.

Authors:  Bhavani Moparty; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04

6.  Is routine intraoperative cholangiogram necessary in the twenty-first century? A national view.

Authors:  Elizaveta Ragulin-Coyne; Elan R Witkowski; Zeling Chau; Sing Chau Ng; Heena P Santry; Mark P Callery; Shimul A Shah; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Intraoperative ERCP: What role does it have in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Luis R Rábago; Alejandro Ortega; Inmaculada Chico; David Collado; Ana Olivares; Jose Luis Castro; Elvira Quintanilla
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16

8.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  For patients with predicted low risk for choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, selective intraoperative cholangiography and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective strategy to limit unnecessary procedures.

Authors:  Michael F Byrne; Mark T McLoughlin; Robert M Mitchell; Henning Gerke; K Kim; Theodore N Pappas; M S Branch; Paul S Jowell; John Baillie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  How reliable is intraoperative cholangiography as a method for detecting common bile duct stones? : A prospective population-based study on 1171 patients.

Authors:  Per Videhult; Gabriel Sandblom; Ib Christian Rasmussen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.