Literature DB >> 1839065

Suppression or facilitation of operant behaviour by raclopride dependent on concentration of sucrose reward.

G Phillips1, P Willner, R Muscat.   

Abstract

Rats responded under continuous reinforcement for 1%, 10% or 95% sucrose pellets, under food deprived or ad libitum access conditions. In both cases responding was highest for 10% sucrose reinforcement, and a small proportion of 95% sucrose was not consumed. Ad libitum food access reduced response rates for all sucrose concentrations. Responding for 10% and 95% sucrose pellets followed a parallel time-course; and accumulation of 95% sucrose pellets was immediate and nonprogressive. Extinction following availability of 95% sucrose pellets caused an increase in response rate, but removal of 10% sucrose led only to a decline in responding. Under both food deprived and non-deprived conditions, the dopamine D-2 antagonist raclopride dose-dependently decreased responding for 1% or 10% sucrose, but increased responding for, and consumption of, 95% sucrose reward. After eight sessions of responding under extinction conditions, the presentation of reward-associated cues increased response rate early in the session. Raclopride had no effect during this period, but decreased responding later in the session. We consider the implications of these results for theories of neuroleptic drug action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1839065     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  39 in total

1.  IS IT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT THE CLINICAL EFFECTS OF NEUROLEPTIC DRUGS (MAJOR TRANQUILLIZERS) FROM ANIMAL DATA?I. "NEUROLEPTIC ACTIVITY SPECTRA" FOR RATS.

Authors:  P A JANSSEN; C J NIEMEGEERS; K H SCHELLEKENS
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1965-02

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits.

Authors:  G Fouriezos; R A Wise
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens, but not of the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine.

Authors:  J R Taylor; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Ingestion affected by the oral environment: the role of gustatory adaptation on taste reactivity in the rat.

Authors:  W G Wilcove
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-09

6.  Pimozide does not impair sweetness discrimination.

Authors:  P Willner; M Papp; G Phillips; M Maleeh; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit.

Authors:  K B Franklin; S N McCoy
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Taste reactivity analysis of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced aphagia: implications for arousal and anhedonia hypotheses of dopamine function.

Authors:  K C Berridge; I L Venier; T E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of haloperidol and d-amphetamine on perceived quantity of food and tones.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; D Wilkie; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  5 in total

1.  Baclofen, raclopride, and naltrexone differentially affect intake of fat/sucrose mixtures under limited access conditions.

Authors:  K J Wong; F H W Wojnicki; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; D Sampson; J Nunn; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Reward-dependent suppression or facilitation of consummatory behaviour by raclopride.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Reliability of the chronic mild stress model of depression: A user survey.

Authors:  Paul Willner
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2016-08-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.