Literature DB >> 3124167

Effects of haloperidol and d-amphetamine on perceived quantity of food and tones.

M T Martin-Iverson1, D Wilkie, H C Fibiger.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that dopamine (DA) receptor agonists and antagonists affect "hedonia" associated with natural rewards was tested, using a psychophysical procedure previously shown to be sensitive to both the sweetness of food and the motivational state of rats. Rats were first trained to discriminate between two different quantities of a rewarding stimulus by pressing one of two levers. Perceived quantity was subsequently derived from generalization trials of intermediate quantities. Haloperidol (0.03-0.083 mg/kg), a DA receptor antagonist, did not influence perceived food quantity, an indirect marker of hedonic value. On the other hand, d-amphetamine (0.25-1.0 mg/kg) affected perceived food quantity in a dose-dependent fashion, and in the same direction as occurs after increasing hunger or food sweetness. Both haloperidol and amphetamine influenced the perceived quantity of a stimulus without natural reinforcing properties (a tone), but the effect of amphetamine on the perceived quantity of this initially neutral stimulus was opposite in direction to that observed with food. These results suggest that whereas amphetamine affects hedonic processes, haloperidol does not. In addition, it seems that haloperidol probably produces its actions through effects on motor mechanisms or by interfering with the response-facilitating properties of rewards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3124167     DOI: 10.1007/bf00187260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  32 in total

1.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits.

Authors:  G Fouriezos; R A Wise
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Stimulus efficacy, chlorpromazine, and schizophrenia.

Authors:  D E Clody; P L Carlton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Examination of the effects of pimozide on two conditional discrimination problems differing in levels of task complexity.

Authors:  C Szostak; T N Tombaugh; J Tombaugh
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  1981

4.  Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit.

Authors:  K B Franklin; S N McCoy
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; D Karras
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Robbins; B A Watson; M Gaskin; C Ennis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats.

Authors:  R J Beninger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Methamphetamine and time estimation.

Authors:  A V Maricq; S Roberts; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-01

10.  The effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour maintained under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  M J Morley; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  17 in total

1.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Modulation of behavior by expected reward magnitude depends on dopamine in the dorsomedial striatum.

Authors:  Carsten Calaminus; Wolfgang Hauber
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.911

5.  Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding.

Authors:  P Willner; K Chawla; D Sampson; S Sophokleous; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Different behavioral effects of haloperidol, clozapine and thioridazine in a concurrent lever pressing and feeding procedure.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M S Cousins; C Maio; M Champion; T Turski; J Kovach
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Modeling operant behavior in the Parkinsonian rat.

Authors:  Irene Avila; Mark P Reilly; Federico Sanabria; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Claudia L Chavez; Nikhil Banerjee; Peter Killeen; Eddie Castañeda
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Pharmacological characterization of performance on a concurrent lever pressing/feeding choice procedure: effects of dopamine antagonist, cholinomimetic, sedative and stimulant drugs.

Authors:  M S Cousins; W Wei; J D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Cannabinoid CB1 antagonists and dopamine antagonists produce different effects on a task involving response allocation and effort-related choice in food-seeking behavior.

Authors:  K S Sink; V K Vemuri; T Olszewska; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The adenosine A2A antagonist MSX-3 reverses the effects of the dopamine antagonist haloperidol on effort-related decision making in a T-maze cost/benefit procedure.

Authors:  Allison M Mott; Eric J Nunes; Lyndsey E Collins; Russell G Port; Kelly S Sink; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.